Yuba County CA Archives History - Books .....Chapter 8 Gold Mining In Yuba County 1924 ************************************************ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/ca/cafiles.htm ************************************************ File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by: Joy Fisher http://www.genrecords.net/emailregistry/vols/00001.html#0000031 January 3, 2012, 12:28 pm Book Title: History Of Yuba And Sutter Counties CHAPTER VIII GOLD MINING IN YUBA COUNTY Old Landmark at Timbuctoo A wonderfully preserved relic of the days when Yuba County was at the zenith of its commercial importance, because of the output of its gold mines, is a building yet standing in Timbuctoo, suburb of the once famed Smartsville mining camp, nestling in the mountains eighteen miles east of Marysville. For many years, in Argonaut days, this structure was the local headquarters for Wells, Fargo & Company's Express and the Adams Express Company. It is estimated that several million dollars' worth of gold dust passed through this building. Built of brick made near its site, the building, up to a few years ago, retained the huge iron doors peculiar to pioneer days, which did double service as protection from fire and from robbers. Within 150 yards from this building the early-day miner, working with crude appliances, took from the soil all the way from $250 to $400 a day. "I'm buying blue chips tonight, boys; she is coming my way," was the way the sturdy miner had of expressing satisfaction with his day's work. The sign remaining upon the store, and still decipherable, reads: "Stewart Bros., owners, have for sale dry goods, groceries and provisions, boots and shoes. Wells, Fargo & Co.; Lowe Bros. & Co.; exchange for sale; hardware, etc." Though painted last in 1859, by a man now residing in New Orleans, the lettering of the sign still stands out plainly. The store building is the only remnant left of a once bustling Timbuctoo. The Landmarks Committee of the Native Sons and Native Daughters of Marysville, and of the Federated Women's Clubs of Northern California, are planning to restore the building to its original shape, and to place a marker upon it, in order that it may be preserved, and that its history may be handed down to future generations. The Timbuctoo Hotel stood on the opposite side of the street from the express office. Nothing is left of that structure, it having gone the way of all Timbuctoo, which same is the story of many an old California mining camp that nourished in the days gone by. Early-day Terms, Customs, and Methods To the Argonauts who delved for gold in Yuba County became known every feature of the work peculiar to their for the most part newly adopted vocation. Among these were the location of leads, coyote or hill diggings — evidences of which still exist near Marysville and Browns Valley — surface diggings, wet surface diggings, fluming, drift gold, prospecting, panning, the cradle, sluices, riffles, tailings, and quicksilver methods. The life and the methods associated with mining in Yuba County were similar to those in other portions of the State. The miner constituted a class of the genus homo peculiar to itself — active, restless, energetic, fearless, practical to the last degree. To his mind, everything had a value in proportion to its use. Governed by strange whims, he would name his claim, or nickname his companion, after any peculiarity of person, incident or fancied resemblance. Many were the ludicrous names applied to mining camps, the reason for the giving of which is a riddle to us now, though no doubt there was a good one to the mind of the christener. With the naming of each, there is no doubt something of interest connected, but it is often impossible to learn just what, as the miners who later worked there knew nothing about it. They cared little what or how a place was named, so long as they could strike "pay dirt." And yet, the reason for the name is often self-evident or easily inferred. Frequently a new man would come along and ask the miners where he could go to work. Not caring to be bothered with him, they would point out some spot, occasionally where they thought there was nothing whatever. If the man made a strike there, they would call it "Greenhorn Bar," or "Fool's Luck," or something of that kind. If a man became "dead broke," but finally made one last effort and "struck it rich," he would call his location "Last Chance," or "Murphy's Luck." "Cut-eye Foster's Bar" was so named because Foster, the locator, had a cut over his eye. The precise reasons for naming the following are beyond our knowledge, and we simply give the names, leaving the fertile imagination of the reader to supply the rest: Whiskey Gulch, Lousy Level, Liar's Flat, Shirt-tail Bend, Moonshine Creek, Old Hat Hollow, Stud Horse Canyon, Grub Ravine, Pinch 'em Tight, Jackass Ravine; and there are many others of equally suggestive import. A man's full name was seldom known, except by a personal friend, as it was customary to call him by his given name, or to apply a nickname on account either of some personal peculiarity or of the place from which he came, such as Bob Kentuck, Big Jones, Red Mike, Whiskey Bill, Sandy Jim, Judge, Three-finger Jack, Curly Sam, Poker Bob, Limpy Jim, Big-foot Charlie, Texas Jack, Missouri Bill. The habit of carrying revolvers and bowie knives was universal in the early days, and not until 1852 and 1853 was this practice discontinued. In addition to the never failing revolver, most of the emigrants brought from the States rifles and shotguns, which were found inconvenient and useless in the mines, and were placed in the stores to be disposed of or thrown away. The condition of society was such that every man had to rely upon himself for protection. The revolver and knife being conveniently carried, these were always ready to protect life and property, or avenge real or fancied insult. The Chinese found abundant employment in the mines in early days. Soon after their first appearance, a prejudice against them began to gain ground among the miners, although with few exceptions they were allowed to work peaceably on their claims. After claims were deserted by white miners, economical Chinese located them again, and by diligent toil managed to make them pay handsomely. At first, large numbers of Indians were employed by firms and mining companies, and many of the more independent Digger Indians worked for themselves. Knowing nothing of the value of the gold, at first they were contented if they had enough to eat, and some beads and sugar thrown in for luxuries. Later, however, they began to learn that this yellow sand was worth something, and refused to dig for the whites, preferring to keep the result of their labors with which to buy blankets, dresses, beads, etc., for which they would no longer pay the fancy prices at first charged. They had in 1848 and 1849 given a cup of gold for a cup of beads, and a pound of gold for a pound of sugar. Theodore Sicard was a favorite of a chief, and thus managed to accumulate a large amount of "spangle gold." One of the old residents said that Sicard showed him four or five claret bottles full of this gold, and judged that he must have had at least $70,000, all of which he had obtained from the Indians. David Parks got rich in 1848 trading with the Indians at Parks Bar. William Foster worked Indians at Foster's Bar early in 1849. All along- the river, in 1848, the whites had Indians to help them. Claude Chana used them near Rose Bar, close to the present site of Smartsville. He said that the largest day's work he ever saw was done in September, 1848, at Rose Bar. Four Indians who were working for two white men washed out $1400, an average of $350 each. The white men did nothing but superintend the work and take the gold. Development of Hydraulic Mining and Dredge Mining Through all the early days the miners leaned upon the primitive methods we have outlined; but in later years they developed the hydraulic mining process. Following the decadence of placer and hydraulic mining, for which Yuba County became famous, there came, in turn, the improved system of dredge mining, which method at the present day has placed Yuba County at the head of the gold-producing sections of the world. First operated in New Zealand nearly half a century ago, the continuous chain-bucket dredge attracted the notice of American miners; and the first of the type built in California was constructed on the Yuba River in 1897, by the Risdon Iron Works Company of San Francisco. It was a mechanical success, but the conditions were such that it could not be operated profitably. Several other similar machines were afterwards constructed and operated for a time, but all proved a failure from a financial standpoint until W. P. Hammon, after whom the town of Hammonton was named, entered the field in 1902, after several years' experience at Oroville, in Butte County. The great basin of the Yuba River was at that time what miners call a "blind deposit," the entire basin being covered to an average depth of twenty-two feet with tailings from the hydraulic mines above. These tailings had to be moved, and economically. The value and character of the original gravel deposit had to be ascertained, as also the extent of the deposit that might be mined. The ground was known to be very deep, from sixty to ninety feet below the water-line, fifty per cent deeper than any other ground being dredged at that time. It is said that Hammon expended over $60,000 in preliminary work; and before undertaking to construct the dredge, he had a most thorough knowledge of the situation. Then followed the construction of dredging machines of improved pattern and adequate for the work required. The first two gold-boats operated completely solved the difficulties encountered and made the enterprise a thorough success. The company with which Hammon is connected, and of which he is the moving spirit, began operations in the Yuba district in August, 1904. It was incorporated in March, 1905, as the Yuba Consolidated Goldfields, with a capital of $12,500,000, and is now actively engaged in dredge mining on the river beds, on a large tract on the Yuba River, nine miles east of Marysville. The recently constructed boats are 120 feet in length and 50 feet in width. They are run by electricity received from the Colgate plant on the Yuba River near Dobbins, and each machine requires about 375 horse-power. They each handle from 2500 to 3500 cubic yards of material per day. The immense dredgers now being added to the fleets at Hammonton and Marigold are being built of steel at a cost, each, of half a million dollars. This will give to the reader some indication of the amount of gold being taken from the bed of the stream. In the beginning, sixteen years ago, these gold-boats were constructed of wood at a cost of $100,000 each. Many of the wooden boats long ago went into the discard along with their machinery. The hills about Hammonton are covered with scrap from the abandoned wooden boats. While thus conducting its dredge-mining operations, the company has also engaged, in conjunction with the Federal government, in building training walls of rock several miles in length, for the purpose of confining the Yuba River (which normally has a tendency to "fan out") in a defined channel, in order to hold in place the great deposit of tailings now there and prevent its moving on down, to the damage of the farms in the valley below. These walls, which are built in most substantial manner and many times stronger than originally contemplated by the government officers, and which would have cost the United States at least half a million dollars if done by it, were constructed free of charge by the dredging company, and have proven of incalculable benefit as a measure of protection to property-owners in both Yuba and Sutter Counties. Many men and members of their families are given employment both on the boats and in the repair shops maintained at Hammonton, where the company has built a commodious hotel, homes for the workmen, and a school. Marysville reaps much trade from the residents of Hammonton, all of whom are required by the company to be thrifty and steady-going, in order to hold secure their employment. While W. P. Hammon gives the Oroville district, where he first achieved success in dredge mining, all the credit due it, he pronounces the Yuba fields the greatest in the world. The amount of ground suitable and profitable for dredging in the Yuba district is so great that it will require the work of the dredgers for at least another decade to exhaust it, and all the while it will add much to the gold supply of the world. As conducted on the Yuba, no damage is being done, or can be done, to the valley. The land used for dredge mining is, as a rule, comparatively worthless for agriculture, being in the bed of the river, and the former owners have received for it from the mining company prices many times in excess of its former assessed value. The success of this industry means much to the county. It adds largely to the taxable wealth; it employs a great number of men; it brings to the section many visitors of prominence and possessed of capital to invest; and it is doing more than any other industry to attract attention from abroad to our varied resources, mineral and agricultural, and to invite homeseekers and home-builders to locate here. Recent reports made by the United States' government place Yuba County at the head of the gold-producing territories in the nation, and in the world. This leading place as a mining center is due to the great quantity of the precious metal being take from Yuba River by gold-dredging boats operated at Hammonton by the Yuba Consolidated Goldfields Company, and at Marigold operated by the Marysville Dredging Company. On the opposite bank of the Yuba River the Guggenheim interests also have large boats working, bringing up from the depths of the river gold that was washed down the stream in the days of the hydraulic process. From the hydraulickers, who used large and powerful monitors to wash the mountain-sides into their sluice-boxes, as much gold escaped as was "cleaned up," if not more. This is the metal now accountable for Yuba County's enviable position in the mining world. It is now estimated that the life of the dredger fields at Hammonton and Marigold is ten years, although recent plans entered into between the government and the dredger companies indicate that the period of profitable operation may be still longer prolonged. PROPOSED DAMS AT BULLARDS BAR AND SMARTSVILLE At the time this volume was in the hands of the publishers, the Yuba Development Company, a $24,000,000 corporation, had in course of construction an immense dam at Bullards Bar on the Yuba River, in this county, the chief purpose of which is to permit the resumption of hydraulic mining in Yuba, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, and incidentally to engage in power and irrigation development. In addition, the Yuba Development Company has amalgamated with a powerful group of interests and individuals controlling thousands of acres of land adjoining both sides of the Yuba River, east of Smartsville, for the purpose of developing hydroelectric power and irrigation projects, involving an outlay of several millions of dollars. Organizations and individuals back of the enterprise include the C. F. Ayer Estate, through the Excelsior Water & Mining Company; the Yuba Development Company; the Metals Exploration Company, with headquarters in New York City; Harry Payne Whitney, Eastern capitalist; and Bulkley Wells, multimillionaire mine owner and promoter. The construction of the two great impounding dams proposed — the one, already mentioned as being under way at Bullards Bar, and the other at the Narrows on the main Yuba River channel at Smartsville — is a work teeming with possibilities. It was expected that the work on the Bullards Bar dam would be completed by the fall of 1923; and it was planned to start the construction of the second dam at Smartsville at about the time when this first barrier should be completed. The Bullards Bar dam, if the plans carry, will be 175 feet in height, and so constructed that it may be added to. The Smartsville dam will also be 175 feet in height, according to the engineers' plans. Together, these barriers will cost in excess of $3,000,000, and will be capable of impounding millions of cubic feet of tailings and debris which will be washed down stream through the operation of the hydraulic mines; and at the same time they will make it possible for the operators to comply fully with the anti-debris law as it pertains to the choking of the waterways in the valley. The impounding dams will make possible the opening of hydraulic mines at various points above the barriers, particularly in the Bloomfield district of Nevada County, where W. B. Bourne and George W. Starr, mining operators of Grass Valley, control extensive gravel beds, and also near Smartsville, where the Ayer Estate owns outright large deposits of auriferous gravel. Owners of gravel deposits not financially interested in the dams will be given an opportunity to use the dam for impounding purposes by payment of a rate to be agreed upon. At least this was the announcement made recently by the projectors of the big scheme. Water and Power Interests Under the terms of the agreement entered into between the Yuba Development Company and the Smartsville contingent, the Excelsior Water & Power Company would have exclusive right to handle the water interests of the project below the Yuba River Narrows. In addition to the debris to be impounded, it is estimated that sufficient water will be conserved behind the two dams to irrigate approximately 25,000 acres of agricultural lands south of the Yuba River and extending from the foothills in the Smartsville district almost to Wheatland. The land to be benefited is owned largely by the Ayer Estate and the James K. O'Brien Estate. The plan of the Excelsior Water and Power Company is, to develop the main distributing system for the handling of the storage water and in this manner to dispose of it to an irrigation district to be formed in the future, after the project is under way. Much of the land to be placed under irrigation is of comparatively low value at present except for grazing purposes, but can be made to produce abundantly with water. It is said the Pacific Gas & Electric Company already has agreed to take the power generated at the Bullards Bar plant. The power plants that are to form part of the new development project will be located near the sites of the dams. It is thought that the Pacific Gas & Electric Company is also enamored of the power to be developed at the Smartsville dam; and it is believed that this company is heavily interested with the Yuba Development Company in the immense project. Possibilities of Danger During the month of February, 1923, following the announcement of the plan of the Yuba Development Company and its associates to build the barriers in Yuba River, Charles K. McClatchy, editor of the Sacramento Bee, in his paper questioned the advisability of permitting the resumption of hydraulic mining behind these dams. McClatchy warned the valley counties, particularly Sutter, Yuba and Sacramento Counties, that they might be courting the troubles which they endured at an earlier period, and which they finally blocked in the courts of the State and nation, causing hydraulic mining to be placed under ban because of the filling of the valley reaches of the Yuba and Feather Rivers with detritus from the mines operated under the hydraulic process. The Sawyer decision, estopping the operation of mines by the hydraulic process, was recalled by McClatchy. Letter of Major Grant Under date of February 13, 1923, Major U. S. Grant, 3rd, of the corps of engineers of the California Debris Commission, with headquarters in San Francisco, sent the following letter to McClatchy, which is self-explanatory: "To the Editor of The Bee. "Sir: 1. Your letter of January 20, 1823, addressed to Col. Herbert Deakyne, president of the California Debris Commission, has been referred to me as secretary and executive officer of the commission. I am not advised of the character of announcements as to a general resumption of hydraulic mining on the Yuba River, except what has been stated from time to time in The Bee, of which I am a regular and quite careful reader. I am, therefore, somewhat at a loss as to just how to answer your inquiry. "2. The Yuba Development Company is adding considerably to the height of its present dam at Bullards Bar, bringing it up to an elevation of 175 feet under authority granted by the California Debris Commission in June, 1922. The plans for this new dam have been very carefully gone over by the commission and are believed to be fully within the limits of safety. Certainly the concrete arch dam which is being built in this case is the very safest type for such work, and the kind of dam which we would like to see built in every case. The construction of this dam is proceeding under the continual inspection of the California Debris Commission. It is expected that it will have a total storage capacity behind it of about 40,000,000 cubic yards of debris. "As the Yuba Development Company appears to be willing to sell some of this storage space at a reasonable rate, it will be of considerable benefit to those mining on a small scale and will give them positive debris storage at a lower price than they can obtain by individual barriers of even a much less safe type. Until the space behind the dam is entirely filled up, we will be sure of the escape of no debris from the region above it, except such light slickens as are inevitably carried over the top of any dam by high water. "3. It is understood that the Yuba Development Company contemplates the utilization of part of the reservoir behind the dam for the development of hydro-electric power. This feature comes under the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission, which, I understand, has also scrutinized and approved the design of the dam. The space will not only provide for the storage of any retarded movement of mining debris, but will also catch natural erosion and old tailings which would otherwise continue to work their way down stream. This dam will then be of general benefit, as well as of direct benefit to the rivers, by the retention of all debris above it, and by the storage of much flood water for release during the low-water season. "4. A dam in the Narrows near Smartsville was a part of the original project of the California Debris Commission, but was never built, the construction of barriers having begun downstream and never having been carried up this far. The project now comprises only the Daguerre Point dam (already built), the north and south training walls above and below the latter (not yet completed), and certain rectification of the channel. This work has proven so effective that the California Debris Commission is now making every effort to complete the south training wall below Daguerre Point to close Inskip Slough, Dunning Channel and the other old channels where large quantities of debris are stored and might be set in motion by unexpected high water. In view of present conditions, it does not appear to me likely that the California Debris Commission would for many years consider the construction of any other dams upstream from Daguerre Point. [Daguerre Point is about ten miles above Marysville, and an equal distance below the Narrows, near Smartsville. — Editor.] "Some years ago, the Harmon Engineering Company drew up a project for fairly extensive mining in the Yuba River, including a diversion dam somewhere near Smartsville; but, as far as known by this office, this plan was definitely given up. While I have heard from time to time some talk of this project or a similar one being taken up again by various mining interests, no application has been made to the commission for a license to mine under any such project. However, I think the commission would be inclined to act favorably on any such proposition, if it contained, as an essential part, the construction of a safe and permanent barrier providing for and assuring the storage of debris behind it. Such a barrier would tend to stop the movement of all debris above it for a number of years, and would relieve the deposits held back by the Daguerre Point barrier from the gradual annual accretions now reaching them. "5. In the last paragraph of your letter, you do specifically inquire as to whether the duties of the California Debris Commission extend to the protection of agricultural lands and other interests besides navigation. For your information in this regard, I inclose a copy of the Act of Congress approved March 1, 1893, on which the jurisdiction of the commission is based. It is evident from the terms of the law itself that Congress claimed jurisdiction to control hydraulic mining solely on the ground of the resulting injury and damage to navigable waters; but any measures which stop the movement of debris and tend to regulate the flow of water in time of freshets necessarily are of general benefit, and incidentally afford some protection to otherwise exposed agricultural lands. "This letter has been somewhat delayed in order to give it the serious consideration which the subject-matter deserves. "For the California Debris Commission, "Yours truly, "U. S. Grant. 3rd, "Major, Corps of Engineers, "Member and Secretary. "San Francisco, February 13, 1923." Reply of the Editor of The Bee To Major Grant's letter editor McClatchy made reply, reviewing the hydraulic mining situation and pointing out that the State and Federal courts retain jurisdiction and authority to issue injunctions against injurious hydraulic mining. McClatchy's reply of March 1, 1923, was as follows: "The act of 'Congress of 1893 provides for the appointment of a California Debris Commission, composed of Federal engineers, to devise plans for restoration and protection of navigation and to permit hydraulic mining to be carried on, 'provided the same can be accomplished without injury to navigability' of the rivers or to 'lands adjacent thereto.' It authorizes issuance of permits under such safeguards as will 'protect the public interests and prevent such injury,' and further provides that 'no more debris shall be washed than can be impounded within the restraining works erected.' Hydraulic mining on the watersheds of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, without such permit, is by the same act prohibited and declared unlawful, and any injury to navigation, directly or indirectly, from such mining is made a misdemeanor punishable by fine or imprisonment, or by both. There are various other provisions of the act which need not be mentioned here. The Federal act, however, although it has been adjudged constitutional, gives the commission no judicial powers, and in no way interferes with the authority of the courts, State or Federal, to protect either public or private property from injury caused by hydraulic mining, even when done under a permit from the commission. This was decided by the supreme court of California in the case of the County of Sutter vs. Nichols, owner of the Polar Star hydraulic mine, who had built a debris dam under the direction of the debris commission, and was operating with its permission and in accord with its requirements. The injunction issued by Judge Davis of the superior court of Sutter County was sustained on appeal, without dissent, five justices of the supreme court uniting in the decision. The lower court had found the dam insufficient to prevent debris from being carried down and causing injury to public property, and that the dam was not of a permanent character. The supreme court held the defendant could not be relieved from liability for damage because of the commission's permit; that the Federal act was not intended to license either the filling of the river channel with debris or the doing of injury to private property by discharging debris into the rivers. It was held also that it was not the intent of the Federal statute to exonerate the miner from liability for injuries, or in any respect to limit or restrict the powers of the State courts to protect private property from threatened injury and to redress inflicted injury thereto from the operation of hydraulic mines, though carried on under a permit and in strict compliance with the plans and directions of the debris commission, and that the Federal act does not have that effect. "No doubt seems to be entertained in the Sacramento Valley that the debris commission has done much useful work in construction of barriers and training walls in and along the Yuba River, to restrain debris turned into the stream or its tributaries by hydraulic mining prior to the creation of that body. And in granting permits for construction of debris barriers across the Yuba at Bullards Bar it is presumed to have acted within the spirit of that statute and in accord with its requirements. But the people of the Sacramento Valley always have opposed use of the river channels for storage of debris from hydraulic mining in order that this private and transient industry may be continued, however useful such barriers may be to prevent or lessen further injury because of past operations. It is evident, however, from the decision of the State supreme court in the Polar Star case, outlined in the foregoing, that any county, community, district or land-owner may at any time obtain relief or protection in the courts from either actual or threatened injury, despite permits issued by the debris commission in accord with its authority and the instructions of Congress. "The statement recently published by The Bee, that the debris dam at Bullards Bar on the Yuba is being raised to a height of 175 feet by a private corporation, with approval of the commission, to create a storage reservoir with a capacity for 40,000,000 cubic yards of debris, is now officially confirmed. And Major Grant says: 'Until the space behind the dam is entirely filled up, we will be sure of the escape of no debris from the region above it, except such light slickens as are inevitably carried over the top of any dam by high water.' It was largely such light material, however, that caused ruin and devastation to the bottom lands of the Yuba in the earlier history of hydraulic mining. The yellowish pipe-clay and fine sands were washed down by hydraulic mines from the mountain region into the valley of the river by millions of cubic yards, converting fertile farms, orchards and vineyards into a desert waste, as described in the decision of United States Circuit Judge Sawyer in the famous suit of Woodruff vs. the North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Company. The channel of the stream below the foothills, down almost to its junction with the Feather, at Marysville and Yuba City, was completely destroyed by the slickens, sands and fine gravel, and the deposits of debris raised the banks and bottom lands several feet above the level of the neighboring lands. "As to the 'slickens' proper — the yellowish pipe-clay commonly washed down in enormous quantities from the precipitous banks of hydraulic mines — it has been the contention of the miners in numerous anti-debris suits that its ultimate destination was nowhere short of the ocean, because of its extreme lightness and portability. And very much expert and official testimony has been given in the courts to show that many millions of cubic yards of it have reached at least Suisun, San Pablo and San Francisco Bays, if not the Pacific Ocean. "The rising generations of Californians, and the newer residents of the State, have but little realization of the magnitude of past hydraulic mining and its present capacities for injury. According to the official reports of former State Engineer Hall, the hydraulic miners upon the streams draining into the Sacramento Basin were using in 1879 a yearly supply of 15,000,000 miner's twenty-four-hour inches of water, and annually were washing into the canyons over 53,000,000 cubic yards of material. The annual water supply here technically expressed in miner's inches is equivalent to about 60,000,000,000 gallons. The Yuba River alone received each year, he estimated, 22,326,500 cubic yards of debris from hydraulic mines. These figures (based on incomplete data) are probably much below the mark, but suffice for the purposes of illustration. A naked statement in figures of the extent of hydraulic operations conveys little significance. But if the reader will bear in mind the fact that a million cubic yards of debris will cover a square mile to the depth of a foot, he can realize the magnitude of the annual flow of over 22,000,000 cubic yards, into the Yuba. It would fill the Erie Canal to the brim in eighteen months. And this flow, it should be understood, repre sents solid material, water not included. "But one must visit the hydraulic mining regions and see the monitors in operation, fully to realize the destructive nature of the industry. The area of excavations is measured in acres and square miles. Mountains literally have been washed into this valley. The work of the monitors has made vast ampitheaters, shut in by perpendicular precipices, hundreds of feet high, where originally were mountains covered with forest growth. Up to 1878 the Excelsior Company at Smartsville, Yuba County, alone had washed 8,000,000 cubic yards (14,000,000 tons) of material into the Yuba; and ten times that quantity remained to be removed from its claims. In forty days, using 3000 inches of water and blasting extensively, the Miocene Mine poured into the Feather River above Oroville no less than 300,000 cubic yards of debris. "An incomplete statement of the damage caused by hydraulic mining debris is contained in a report made by State Engineer Hall in 1880. Upon the Yuba, Feather and Bear Rivers, Auburn Ravine, and Dry Creek, he found 43,546 acres of valuable land had been covered by debris, and the depreciation and loss thus occasioned to the owners amounted to $2,597,635. But this estimate did not include damages along the Sacramento and American Rivers, nor the vast area of lands protected by levees but greatly reduced in value through the increased danger of overflow and liability to ruin by debris. One of Hall's reports shows that prior to 1885 the channel of the Yuba at Smartsville was filled by the hydraulic mining debris to a depth of 150 feet. In 1882 Colonel Mendell, of the United States corps of engineers, reported to the War Department that the level of the beds of the Yuba and Bear Rivers had risen 'to an elevation of several feet above the banks," the streams being held in place by levees. 'These instances,' he said, 'may be taken to illustrate the ultimate condition of the Sacramento and Feather Rivers under a continuance of the influence to which they are subjected. The abandonment of existing channels is a consequence to be apprehended.' "The danger to navigation, however, was not confined to the rivers of the valley. It affected the bays as well. Witness these extracts from the report, made July 1, 1882: " 'The surveys [San Pablo Bay] of 1863 and 1878 are distinguished by a deposit of 76,025,000 cubic yards made in the interval. The depth of the deposit averaged over the area of comparison, 24 1/2 miles, would be 3.1 feet. . . . The mean reduction in width of channel . . . is 2820 feet, which is 22 per cent of the mean width in 1855. A comparison of maps of three and one-half miles on the Sacramento, near its mouth, and one mile at the mouth of the San Joaquin, shows a deposit of 2,000,000 cubic yards in the Sacramento, and 500,000 in the San Joaquin, between 1867 and 1878. . . . A comparison of charts of Carquinez Straits between different dates indicates the formation of large deposits in recent years.' "According to an official report of the State engineer, made in 1879, 16,000,000 cubic yards of material were carried annually by the waters of the Sacramento River, in suspension, past the capital city. This does not include, he is careful to say, the sands rolled along the bottom by the force of the current — a very considerable quantity. And it is only fair to add that he attributes about 5,000,000 cubic yards of the aggregate to the results of natural wash. "The extent of the auriferous deposits of 'gravel' in the Sierras is not definitely known, but is practically unlimited. It is estimated that 100,000,000 cubic yards of material already have been washed into the Yuba alone, and that "there remain at least 700.000,000 cubic yards more, upon the drainage basin of that stream, workable by present hydraulic methods. "State Engineer Hall reported that 70 per cent of the discharge of debris into the Yuba could be stopped behind dams, leaving 7,000,000 cubic yards a year — a very formidable quantity — to descend that one tributary into the Sacramento Valley. "By far the larger portion of the cost of levees constructed in the Sacramento Valley is chargeable properly to hydraulic mining. There is abundant evidence, to begin with, that Marysville and Yuba City, and the Counties of Yuba and Sutter, needed no levees before hydraulic mining debris had filled up the Yuba and Feather Rivers. Portions only of the business streets of Marysville were wet by the great floods of 1*52-1853 and the still greater floods of 1861-1862, and there was still no thought of building levees. The city had no encircling levee until 1868. But twenty years later her levee account footed up $500,000, nearly one third of the total assessed valuation of the city. Vastly different were conditions in early days, when the rivers were clear and deep, and a deep-draught vessel, which made the voyage around the Horn, ascended the Feather River and discharged her cargo at or near Marysville or Yuba City." Later Details of the Project Subsequently to this correspondence, there were filed with the Division of Water Rights, State Department of Public Works, in Sacramento, more detailed plans of the Yuba Development Company for the vast project. According to these plans, the company is to develop 262,130 horse-power of electricity when all its units have been constructed, which, it was thought, will require several years. There will be nine storage reservoirs and six hydroelectric power plants. The power will be developed by taking advantage of the 6000 feet of fall in the Yuba between Haypress Valley on the south fork of the North Yuba, where the elevation is 6870 feet, and the dam at the Narrows, near Smartsville, where the elevation is 275 feet. The reservoirs will have a storage capacity of 500,000 acre-feet. To distribute and use these waters will require, it was estimated, the construction of some twelve miles of diversion tunnels. The hydroelectric power plants are described as follows: "Sierra City Power House No. 1, located at an elevation of 4400 feet, to be fed from Haypress Valley, Jackson Meadows and Milton reservoirs. The power will have a developed horse-power of 27,640. "Downieville Power House No. 2, at an elevation, of 3000 feet, to be fed from Sierra City reservoir. This power house "will develop 39,140 horse-power. "Toll-bridge Ramshorn Power House No. 3, at an elevation of 2500 feet, to be fed from Toll-bridge and Shady Flat reservoirs. The development here will amount to 15,600 horse-power. "Garden Valley Power House No. 4, at an elevation of 1900 feet, to be fed from Indian Valley reservoir. The hdyroelectric development will be 46,350 horse-power. "Colgate Power House No. 5 (to be constructed by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company for its own use), at an elevation of 600 feet. The development here will amount to 110,500 horse-power. This power house will be in addition to the present Colgate power house of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, which is located at an elevation of about 1300 feet. Both Colgate power houses will be supplied from Bullards Bar reservoir. "Smartsville Power House No. 6, to be at an elevation of 275 feet, will be supplied from the Narrows reservoir. Its capacity will be 22,900 horse-power." The horse-power development of the power plants increases as the river descends, largely due to the increasing volume of water. Sierra City power house will have only 301 second-feet of water, while the big Colgate power house will have 1100 second-feet and Smartsville will have 1300 second-feet. The working out of the units is such that practically no fall of the river will be allowed to go to waste. Soon after the water is discharged from the race of one power house it will be again stored and diverted for another power house. The water for Garden Valley power house will be taken from Indian Valley reservoir through a 29,548-foot tunnel to the head of the penstock to the power house. The water for the big Colgate power house will be taken from Bullards Bar reservoir through a tunnel 31,800 feet long to the penstock of this power house. The proposed development of the Yuba River project is declared to be one of the most complete ever contemplated in the country. It provides not only for a series of storage and regulatory dams but also for utilization of practically all fall of the river. About the middle of the year 1923, the Yuba Development Company, through legal process, changed the name and title of the concern to the Yuba River Power Company. On December 23, 1923, the company announced the completion of the immense dam at Bullards Bar. A month later all the old landmarks at Bullards Bar went up in smoke, as the result of a bonfire used as the most economical means of ridding the site of the old hotel, blacksmith shop, store and other buildings so dear to the heart of the old host, George Mix, and sacred in the memory of the pioneer teamsters and miners. Additional Comments: Extracted from: HISTORY OF YUBA and SUTTER COUNTIES CALIFORNIA WITH Biographical Sketches OF The Leading Men and Women of the Counties Who Have Been Identified with Their Growth and Development from the Early Days to the Present HISTORY BY PETER J. DELAY ILLUSTRATED COMPLETE IN ONE VOLUME HISTORIC RECORD COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 1924 File at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/ca/yuba/history/1924/historyo/chapter8321gms.txt This file has been created by a form at http://www.genrecords.org/cafiles/ File size: 42.9 Kb