HABERSHAM CO., GA - COURT RECORDS - Jas. W. Whitfield vs. Matilda Whitfield, Libel for divorce, 1830 SUBMITTED BY: Donnie Pickard (deemay@netusa1.net) ==================================================================== USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free information on the Internet, data may be used by non-commercial entities, as long as this message remains on all copied material. These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or for presentation by other persons or organizations. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material for purposes other than stated above must obtain the written consent of the file contributor. The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb Archives to store the file permanently for free access. This file was contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by: Donnie Pickard deemay@netusa1.net ==================================================================== Superior Court Writ Record – 1831-1833 Page 64 No. 4 Habersham Superior Court October Term 1830 Jas. W. Whitfield VS Matilda Whitfield} Libel for divorce Georgia- Habersham County To the Honorable A(ugusta) S. Clayton judge of the Superior Court of the said State. Humbly complaining showeth unto your Honor your orator James W. Whitfield that heretofore some time in the month of May eighteen hundred & twenty nine he married his present wife Matilda Whitfield then Matilda Eadens supposing she would make a comfortable affectionate & kind companion but so it is may it please your Honor that instead of realizing these hopes your orator soon found his wife Matilda to be unkind indolent incontinent and extravagantly wasteful yet your Orator states that he will continue to endeavor to dissuade her from her follies and ever treated her with the most tender regards and affection for the period of six or eight months when the said Matilda his wife becoming so far forgetful of her relations as a wife that she secretly took and conveyed away your orators horse & saddle without his knowledge or consent and in some way disposed of the same but your Orator knows not how or in what way or to whom and continued about from your Orator for some time strutting through the county with other men keeping their company & frequently & openly committing adultery with them consequent to which your orator states the said Matilda returned to him professing penitence for her errors & promised reformation yet your Orator saith the said Matilda only remained with a few days when returning to her old practices she left the bed & board of your Orator & took up with & went off to Buncombe County with other men daily committing adultery with them and utterly & wholly refuses to return to your Orator or to live with him. Whereupon your Orator says his peace happiness & prospects of connubial filially are destroyed. In tender consideration of all which promises your Orator pray for a divorce a vin__ to matrimonii & that such other & further proceedings may be had as are usual in such cases and your Orator with every pray. Wm. H. Stutman Jas. W. Whitfield VS Matilda Whitfield} Libel for divorce The dependant is hereby required to be and appear personally or by attorney at the next Superior Court to be held on the third Monday in October next then & there to answer the plaintiff in an action for a divorce & as in default there of the court will proceed as to justice shall appertain witness the Honorable A.S. Clayton judge of said court this 12th day of August 1830. John T. Carter c.s.c. Sept 25th the deft is not to be found in this county A. Mauldin d.shff. Dismissed Whereupon it is considered by the court that the deft. do recover of the plff. The sum of seven dollars seventy five cents for his costs. W.H. Stutman