Georgia:  Hancock County: Williamson v. Herbert, Tison & Ferrell

====================================================================
USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing
free information on the Internet, data may be used by
non-commercial entities, as long as this message
remains on all copied material. These electronic
pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit
or for presentation by other persons or organizations.

Persons or organizations desiring to use this material
for purposes other than stated above must obtain the
written consent of the file contributor.

The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb
Archives to store this file permanently for free access.
This file was contributed by:
Judith Tyson Raymond
HRay581257@aol.com
====================================================================


Jones County, Ga Superior Court Minutes
October Term 1821, P. 58

William Williamson
Green Williamson
Admrs. of Zerobabel			Bill in Equity for
Williamson decd.				discovery & relief &
	vs					writ of ne exeat
John Herbert, James Tison
Winson Tison, Kinchen P. Tison Job Tison 
P. 59
and John Ferrell
heirs & distributees 
of Job Tison, decd.
On motion it is ordered that the writ of ne exeat in the case be discharged on the ground of the insufficiency of the 
affidavit.

Jones County, GA Superior Court Minutes 1826 - 1829
Drawer 154; Box 55, P. 87
April Term 1827
Wm. Williamson & Green Williamson		
In Equity for Relief
and adms.
of Zerobable Williamson, decd.		                   discovery Apr. Term 1827
vs						                    Service perfected
John Herbert, James Tison, Winson
Tison, K.P. Tison, et.al.


Jones County, GA Superior Court Minutes 1826 - 1829
Drawer 154; Box 55, P. 90
April Term 1827

Williamson & Others
	vs			Bill in Equity &
Tison & Others		 Ne Exeat

	On motion of Counselor for deft. [defendant] Ordered that the Soll. [solicitor] for Complainant shew [show?] 
cause du [or do] savi__ as Can__al can be head?[heard?] why the ne exeat should not be dismissed.  

John Herbert		Cutirra (or Certima?) from Baldwin Inferior Court
	vs			It appearing to the Court that the Cutirra (or Certinna?)
Tomlinson Fort		in the above case was transferred to this court for 
				argument ^argument^ having been heard at the 
[the rest missing]

Jones County, GA Superior Court Minutes 1826 - 1829
Drawer 154; Box 55, P. 141
October Term 1827

Wm. Williamson, Green Williamson
adms. of Z. Williamson					In Equity Bill for discovery
		vs						and relief
John Herbert, James Tison, Winson Tison,		April 1827 Service Perfected on Winson Tison Oct. Term
K. P. Tison & John Farrell & wife, heirs and	1826
distributes of John Tison, decd.			Service perfected as to John 
								Herbert & Malvina Herbert

			On motion of Complainants Solicitor it is ordered that the above bill be taken pro confesso as 
to Winson ^Tison^ John Herbert and  Malvina Herbert
******************
It appearing to the Court that Mary Ann B Bowen [Bowman?] is an Infant under the age of Twenty  one and that her 
Testamentary Guardian Jason [could be Susan] D. Bowen has filed his [her] petition for dower at this Term for Lot 
Land number twenty in the tenth district of said County to which the Said Infant has a claim of title.  It is therefore 
Ordered that James Wilson be appointed Guardian pendente lite to attend to assignment of dower & defend the same 
if necessary.
Jones County, GA Superior Court Minutes 1826 - 1829
Drawer 154; Box 55, P. 229
October Term 1828

William Williamson &
Green Williamson admr.			Bill in Equity for 
of Zerobable Williamson decd.		discovery & relief
		vs
John Herbert James Tison
Winson Tison, KinchenP. Tison
Job Tison and John Ferrell 			Dismissed
heirs & distributes of Job Tison, decd.

Jones County, GA Superior Court Minutes 1826 - 1829
Drawer 154; Box 55, P. 241
October Term 1828
William Williamson &		  		Bill in Equity & @ [etc]
Green Williamson 
adm. of Zeobabel Williamson
		vs
John Herbert, Kinchen P.			On motion of Solicitors for
Tyson & others					Defendants It is ordered that the bill
							for the rehearing be dismissed & the decision of the court on 
the original bill & demurrer had ?shall be? confirmed.
Transcribed by Judith T. Raymond