Monroe County GaArchives Court.....Taylor, John (contest Of) 1833 ************************************************ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/ga/gafiles.htm ************************************************ File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by: Paula Matabane pmatabane@verizon.net January 22, 2008, 3:37 pm Source: Document 21 Written: 1833 John Taylor Contesting of Taylor’s Will Court of the Ordinary May 1833 Monroe County, GA Document 21 And now at this time the will of John Taylor late of said county deceased being brought before the Court for Probate in solemn form and for administration to record. Jeremiah Taylor, Amos Nobles in right of his wife Jenissey??? Nobles, John Taylor, Reuben Taylor in right of his wife Polly, John C. King in right of his wife Susan King being legatees under the pretended will of the said John Taylor deceased came and ??? their caveat against proof of said will on the following grounds to wit’’ 1) That said John Taylor at the time of making said pretended will was not of sound disposing mind and memory; 2nd) For that said John Taylor did not execute said pretended will freely, but was unduly influenced and induced by the overpowering unfortunities??? of his wife and others acting in her behalf to make said pretended will and to make an unequal distribution of his property whereby he gave to his wife and his children by her a much larger share than would have been entitled to by distribution and under to that explicit diminished the shares of the caveators. 3) For that the said John Taylor made said pretended will under the belief that the advancement made to his children being the caveators and others by his first wife together with the share given them by said pretended will would make the shake of each equal to the shares of his last wife and his children by her - which belief was founded up a mistake in the facts and the circumstances connected with the advancement. N. P. Taisse??? J.J. Pinchback attorneys for caveators filed in office May 2, 1853 E. J. Cabarifs David R. Tinsley En? and Cynthia Taylor En? of the said John Taylor came into court and trancred the power of the met?? court and they say that John Taylor was of sound mind and memory at the time of executing said will, that he executed said will freely and without compulsion, that he was not unduly influenced or induced by his wife or by any other person to make said will. He was not unduly influenced to make an unequal distribution of his estate, nor did the said John Taylor make said will under the belief that the advancement made to the children of his first wife, together with the share given them under said will, would make the share of each equal to the share of his wife and his children by her, nor was there any mistake in the fact and circumstances connected with the advancement, wherefore they say that the said will is good and valid in law and ought to be admitted to be proved and recorded ??? ??? ??? judgment of the court. Z. E. Harman File at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/ga/monroe/court/taylor675gwl.txt This file has been created by a form at http://www.genrecords.org/gafiles/ File size: 3.3 Kb