ky-footsteps Wednesday, 28 January 1998 Volume 01 : Number 363 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Phyllis Hill Date: Tuesday, January 27, 1998 9:05 PM Subject: KY-F: MARR: Breeden Marriages, Carroll Co Carroll County, Kentucky Marriage Index: Breeden Groom Bride Year Adams, Elmer D. Breeden, Virginia 1928 Aldridge, Loyd Breeden, Mary F. 1927 Arvin, Hugh E. Breeden, Maggie 1913 Baker, Jas. Breeden, Cora Belle 1910 Bell, Clenith W. Breeden, Christine 1931 Breeden, Bert E. Breeden, nellie M. 1938 Brisby, Thomas Copher, Martha B. 1872 Copher, G. W. Scanland, Elizabeth 1872 Curtis, Millard Breeden, Fannie 1899 Driskell, David Breeden, Laura 1908 Earle, Clarence Breeden, Alma Mae 1915 George, J. B. Breeden, Loulie 1907 George, Nevill Breeden, Mollie 1928 Goins, James Breeden, Catherine 1935 Holsclaw, Clarence Breeden, Willie J. 1890 Jones, Carrol Breeden, Gracie 1902 Madison, Mitchell Breeding, Jane 1884 Reeves, James S. Breeden, Livia Ann 1885 Riley, Arthur G. Breeden, Jennie F. 1931 Riley, Fred Breeden, Fannie 1937 Satchwell, Dora B. Breeden, Nannie 1914 Simmons, Johnnie Breeden, Pauline 1926 Smith, William Copher, Elizabeth 1871 Webster, James R. Breeden, Sarah 1922 Young, Pleasant F. Breeden, Laura 1909 ------------------------------ From: Maria Troutman Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:58:33 +0200 Subject: KY-F: Gaither vs. Troutman, Bullitt Co, Pt 1 of 5 John R. Gaither vs. Michael Troutman’s Heirs Bullitt Circuit Court Decrees No. 39 (v.14) Bill: 7th June 1814 Your Orator, John R. GAITHER, showeth that on the 27th day of July 1804 he was possessed of a tract of land in fee simple patented to and in the name of your Orator for 500 acres lying and being in the circuit afsd on the south side of Salt River and Cedar Creek - - that the said land was well improved and productive - - that your Orator lived on the same with his family, Which was their only home - - and that the said tract of land was well worth at that time at least the sum of $3000. Your Orator further states that before that time he had been involved in law about the title to said land with a conflicting title or claim and succeeded in establishing his to be the better right - - that being greatly distressed for some money, a certain Michael TROUTMAN offered to advance the sum wanted which did not exceed $240 on his getting the said land security for the return of said money, to which your Orator agreed. It was also then agreed that the land should remain as a security for any other sum which the said Michael should advance - - that Your Orator should retain and hold the possession of the said land and enjy the issues and profits thereof and pay the taxes thereon and that the land afsd should be mortgaged to the said TROUTMAN for teh purposes afsd. Your Orator further states that the said TROUTMAN procured an absolute deed to be drawn from Your Orator to him for said land which your Orator executed - - and also the following bond from him to Your Orator dated the 27th day of July 1804 which he executed and delivered - - that at the time the said deed and bond were executed the said Michael represented that all was fair and no advantage could be taken and that by the said writings it was no sale but operated as a mortgage to secure the payment of the money advanced and which might be advanced by the said Michael to Your Orator, which was the real contract or agreement between them, and upon which terms and conditions and no other. Your Orator made the said deed and received the said bond. Your Orator further states that sometime about the last of December 1806 the said Michael advanced for Your Orator somewhere about the sum of $147 to pay off an execution in the name of Samuel SMITH against him, Your Orator - - that the said Michael caused the said deed to be recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the County Court of Bullitt County without any requisition for Your Orator’s wife to relinquish her right dower in the land thereby conveyed, a certified copy of which deed, etc made part of this bill. Your Orator further states that prior to the 27th of July 1808 the said TROUTMAN sold about 130 acres of said tract of land to Richard SIMMONS at $5 per acre and received the purchase money - - that said Richard devised the said land to his son William SIMMONS and departed this life and his will has been duly proved and recorded. And Your Orator makes a copy thereof, etc part of this bill etc. - - that the said Michael conveyed the said 130 acres to the said William SIMMONS as by a certified copy of the deed, etc.. made part of this bill, etc.. - - and that the said Richard before he made the said purchase and the said the William, who is made a deft to this bill had due notice to Your Orator’s right and claim to the said 130 acers of land prior to his receiving the said deed of conveyance. Your Orator further states that he holds the said Michael’s note for the sum of L14.6.6 dated the 12th day of March 18__ -- that he never made a sale of all or any part of said land to said Michael - - that a sale of it was neither spoken of or in the contemplation of the parties when said deed and bond were executed unless the said Michael had a fraudulent and concealed determination at the time to taken an advantage of Your Orator and that the contract and agreement was prior to and at the time of making said deed and bond for a mortgage only, and for subjecting the said land as a security for the money advanced and to be advanced by the said Michael to Your Orator, but he artfully prevailed upon Your Orator to believe that all was fair, that no advantage would or could be taken of him by readon of the said deed. Your Orator further states that after the said Michael had sold the said 130 acres to said Richard SIMMONS for a sum he received far greater than anything Your Orator owed him, he promised Your Orator to reconvey to him the balance of the 500 acres, which he, under needy circumstances, in old age and with a large family did agree to - - that Your Orator has been in the actual possession of the said land ever since the 27 of July 1804 (except the said 130 acres) and has taken and enjoyed the issues and profits thereof and has paid the taxes thereon - - that the said Michael never paid any taxes on that land and never was in actual possession of any part thereof - - and that very shortly before his death repeated his promise to reconvey the said land to Your Orator - - but as Your Orator is informed and believe that said Michael made his last will and devised said land to his son, Phillip TROUTMAN who is made Deft to this bill and appointed Elizabeth TROUTMAN, his widow executrix and Abraham TROUTMAN, and the said Phillip, the executors, of said will and who as such are made deft to this bill - - and died lately. Your Orator further states that all the advances made by the said Michael and other claims which were justly due to him by Your Orator do not exceed the sum of $400 and the Defts are called upon to exhibit and prove all just claims which the said Michael had against Your Orator when the deed and bond afsd were given and since - - also to state the time when said 130 acres were sold to Richard SIMMONS and the price per acre for which it was sold - - and the said William SIMMONS is also called upon to state what said 130 acres sold for to said Richard per acre and when it was sold to said Richard - - Your Orator further states that if the said William SIMMONS shall hold the said 130 acres of land, and the other defts made liable for the price thereof, the deft executors will be considerably in your Orator’s debt, yet the said Phillip refuses to release and re-convey all the said tract, or the balance thereof after taking off the said 130 acres. All which actings and doings, etc. GAITHER prays that the court will decree in one of the two following ways, either of which he ill submit to, to wit: - - - First, Your Orator shall pay what he justly owes to the estate of the said Michael with interest and the Deft William SIMMONS be compelled to convey the said 130 acres to Your Orator and the said Phillip the said residue of the tract - - Secondly, that the said William retain the legal title to the said 130 acres - - that the other defts be made liable for the price of the said 130 acres, subject to a deduction for all their claims against Your Orator and the Defts decreed to pay him the overplus and the Left. Phillip decreed to convey all the rest and residue of the 600 acres to Your Orator. POPE and A. POPE ANSWER of Phillip TROUTMAN, an infant, by Jonathon SIMMONS, his guardian, 10 March 1815. He admits execution of the deed and bond for a tract of land upon Cedar Creek upon a part of which the compt then and still resides, but denies that the said writings and the contract between the parties were intended as a mortgage only - - on the contrary he is informed that conditional sale of said land was agreed upon and intended - - that it was clearly under stood by both parties that the compt should within four year reimburse the said Michael whatever money and pay for what other things he had and should then or thereafter advance to or for him; but if such reimbursements and payments should not be made within four years said deed should remain absolute, the said land should be the land of said TROUTMAN and his heirs, and whatever of the L400, the consideration mentioned in said deed, or other monies or things advanced or to be advanced by the said Michael should be reimbursed or paid for by the said Compt less than the full amount should be repaid by the said Michael and that he should keep the said land. This deft has been able to obtain as yet but a very imperfect knowledge of the particular payments and advances made by the said Michael to the compt before, at or since the execution of the said deed and bond. He has been told the said Michael was in advances to the Compt upwards of L500 but the death of the said Michael has put it out of his power not only to prove but even to specify all the particulars thereof. The deed afsd shows that L400 were paid of advanced by the said Michael to the compt but when or in what this deft does not know. He exhibits herewith and makes part hereof a note given by the compt to the said Michael for L26.11.6 dated the 27 July 1804 and a copy of an account against the compt previous to the execution of the said deed taken from the books of said Micheal amounting to _____. Whether the said note and account made a part of the L400 mentioned in said deed or were independent of it, this deft does not know. Since the execution of said deed and bond as this deft has been told, divers others advances were made by deft to compt as per account amounting to _____, and per his note for L7.11.7. When the said deed was executed, the Compt fraudulently concealed from the said Michael that the said land was bound by a judgment and execution. . . and to satisfy which judgment by virtue of a subsequent execution issued thereon a certain part of said land was with consent of said Compt sold by the proper sheriff according to law to the said Michael, the highest bidder, at the sum of $140 and which he accordingly paid to said sheriff for said part of said land. This deft admits the devise to him in the bill mentioned and insists the said Michael had the legal and equitable right to make such devise to this deft because the said comp had failed to repay the L400 mentioned in said deed and other advances made by said Michael for him or any part thereof within the four years afsd and ever since. This deft denies he has any recollection of the comp requiring him to convey said land to him though had such application been made he surely would, as he is advised he had a right to do, would have refused it. Jonathon SIMMONS ANSWER, Amended, of Phillip TROUTMAN. Sept term 1816. He admits his ancestor, Michael TROUTMAN, deceased, sold to Richard SIMMONS at $5 per acre 444 acres of land part of John EDWARDS survey of 560 acres patented to ______ and conveyed to said Michael and which interferes about 102 acres with the land conveyed by said compt to said Michael. This deft makes part hereof the entry, survey and patent for said 560 acres of land and submits to the court whether the claim of said EDWARDS is not preferable to the claim of said GAITHER. He is informed and believes that the said GAITHER and Michael agreed that the 100 acres purchased by the latter at sheriff’s sale as mentioned in his former answer should be laid off so as to be included within said interference. Phillip TROUTMAN (apparently Phillip has come of age) Notice: Mr. Thomas HALL and Elizabeth, his wife, late widow and executrix of Michael TROUTMAN, deceased, - - ABraham TROUTMAN and Phillip TROUTMAN, executors of the said Michael, dec. - - and the said Phillip, devisee of the said Michael, take notice that on the 17th day of Feb. 1817, I shall attend, etc. Etc. John R. GAITHER Answer: of William SIMMONS, 18 June 1817. He admits his father, Richard SIMMONS purchased of Michael TROUTMAN 100 or 130 acres and received a deed and devised the same to this deft., and paid a valuable consideration to wit: $5 per acre, but he denies that his father or himself had any knowledge of the nature of the contract between the compt and the said Michael. Prays to be dismissed, etc.. WICKLIFFE for deft. Decree: About 1819 Decreed first that William SIMMONS shall have and hold forever all that part of Teller’s preemption within the lines of Compt’s patent for 500 acres which was sold and conveyed by Michael TROUTMAN to Richard SIMMONS and by him willed to the said William SIMMONS and part of 560 acres patented the 15th day of June 1754 in the name of John EDWARDS. Second, that the compt shall pay to the said Phillip B. TROUTMAN $180 in full of all claims between the parties. Third, that the said Phillip shall convey to the compt or his assigns the balance of the said 300 acres not interfering with the said 560 acres by deed of quitclaim and fourth, that each party shall pay his and their own costs. Whereupon it is ordered and decreed that the said compt or his agent do pay to the said Phillip P. TROUTMAN the said sum of $180 and that each party pay his and their own costs expended in this suit, etc. Etc. October 2, 1819. Received of Joseph SIMMONS the $180 mentioned in the within decree. Phillip TROUTMAN Test: Wilford LEE George F. POPE (my note, notice in the above paragraph Phillip’s initials are not the same) Depositions: Depo. Cornelius BOGART, taken Bullitt County, 10 Feb. 1819 Q. ( by compt) When did you first know Salt River and Floyd’s Fork? A. Early in the year 1780. Q.( by same) Were Salt River and Floyd’s Fort notorious by those names on the 24th day of May 1780. A. I well know they were, because I lived in Brashear’s Garrison at that time and near the mouth of Floyd’s Fork. Q. (by same) Was that part of Salt River about the mouth of Floyd’s Fork called the Town Fork and notorious by that name on and before the 24th day of May 1780? A. I know it was generally called the Town Fork for a distinction between the two streams Q. (by same) Is Floyd’s Fork a large fork of Salt River? A. I know it is a fork of Salt River but not as large as the Town Fork. Q. (by same) Did you on or before the 24th day of May 1780 know any other streams in Kentucky called and known by the names of Salt River and Floyd’s Fork and the Town Fork A. I never did since nor before. Q. (by same) If you had after the 24th day of May 1780 have seen John R. GAITHER’s entry of 500 acres in the following words and figures to wit: a annexed copy of the entry, where would you have went yourself or have directed others to find it? A. Having examined a copy of an entry in the name of John R. GAITHER I should have went from Brashear’s Garrison to the mouth of Floyd’s Fork and cross Salt River and on the bank I should have looked for the beginning or directed any other body to the same spot, and further this deponent sayeth not. Cornelius BOGART Depo. William BRASHEAR, same time and place Q. (by compt) When did you first know Salt River and Floyd’s Fork? A. In the year 1779 Q. (by same) Were Salt River and Floyd’s Fork notorious by those names on the 24th day of May 1780 A. I frequently heard them called so. Q. (by same) Was that part of Salt River above the mouth of Floyd’s Fork called the Town Fork and notorious by that name on or before the 24th day of May 1780? A. I have frequently heard it called Town Fork. Q. (by same) Is Floyd’s Fork a large fork of Salt River? A. Yes it is but not as large as the Town Fork, so called. Q. (by same) Did you on or before the 24th day of May 1780 know any other stream in Kentucky called and known by that name of Salt River and Floyd’s Fork and the Town Fork? A. No I did not. Q. (by same) Have Salt River and Floyd’s Fort retained the same names ever since you first knew them? A. Yes they have Q. (by same) If you had after the 24th day of May 1780 seen John R. GAITHER’s entry of 500 acres in the following words and figures to wit: a true copy of John R. GAither’s entry, where would you yourself went or directed others to find it? A Opposite the mouth of Floyd’s Fork and further this deponent sayeth not. William BRASHEAR ------------------------------ From: Maria Troutman Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:58:18 +0200 Subject: KY-F: Gaither vs. Troutman, Bullitt Co, Pt 3 of 5 Depo Thomas C. BRASHEAR, taken at house of Elemelich SWEARINGEN, Bullitt Co., 6 Sept 1816. Q. ( by complt) What was the value of the land per acre where John R. GAITHER now lives in July 27th 1805? A. I think the land taking the whole tract together was worth at that time six dollars per acre. Q. (by same) What did you understand from John R. GAITHER concerning the land he now lives on? A. I understood from GAITHER that the land was his and not TROUTMAN’s. Tho. C. BRASHEAR Depo. Richard SIMMONS, taken at the house of ABraham TROUTMAN, Bullitt County, 8 Feb 1817. Q. (by deft) Did not John R. GAITHER tell you that he sold a tract of land he now lives on to Michael TROUTMAN in his lifetime? A. I do not recollect that John R. GAITHER did but Michael TROUTMAN told me so. Q. (by same) Do you recollect how much money that Michael TROUTMAN paid to your father in the year 1804 for John R. GAITHER? A. I believe upwards of sixty pounds or thereabouts. Q. (by same) Did not John R. GAITHER tell you that he had sold the aforesaid tract of land to Joseph SIMMONS for fifteen hundred dollars and is not sometime since said GAITHER brought suit for sd. Land? A. John R. GAITHER told me that Joseph SIMMONS offered him that for the land but he had not sold to him but expected to let him have it. Q. ( by complt) Was not Mr. GAITHER intoxicated when he communicated to you that he would let Mr. SIMMONS have the land? A. I don’t know whether he was or not. His Richard X SIMMONS mark Depo. Merideth Cosby, Bullitt Co., 26 July 1816 Q. (by complt) Did not Richard SIMMONS in his lifetime call on you to go with him to Michael TROUTMAN’s to read and explain a piece of writing on a contract that was then about to be entered into between said TROUTMAN and said SIMMONS concerning a tract of land and was not the land sold by said TROUTMAN to said SIMMONS adjoining said SIMMONS land and was not Jacob WELLS a tenant at the time on part of said land, and what was the quantity of land sold by said TROUTMAN to said SIMMONS and was not the writing that was drawn satisfactory to both parties and what was the price per acre for said land? A. Some time in the latter part of the summer 1806, Richard SIMMONS since decd. Applied to him, this deponent, to go with him, sd. SIMMONS to Michael TROUTMAN’s since decd., also, and said that he purchased a tract of land of sd TROUTMAN and the he wished said deponent to be present when the writing was drawn, for he was an indifferent reader, and did not know whether TROUTMAN and ROHAN might not impose on him in some way, except he had some person with him, who was a better reader than himself. Said deponent went with him, sd SIMMONS to said TROUTMAN’s , and the writings were drawn on the 9th day of August 1806, apparently to the satisfaction of both parties. The number of acres so sold, or the price per acre, said deponent doth not recollect. Said land thus sold this deponent understood was adjoining the land whereon sd SIMMONS then lived and he believes that Jacob WELLS was a tenant on a part of the land thus sold by TROUTMAN to SIMMONS. Meredith COSBY Depo. Joseph SIMMONS, same place & time. Q. (by complt) How long has the complt lived on the 500 acres of land in contest in this suit - - and was not there a contract between Richard SIMMONS decd and the complainant. A. About fourteen years. There was a contract between the Complt and Richard SIMMONS since dead for said land. Sd. SIMMONS seated old Mr. Saml. STALLINGS on said land who lived thereon about eleven years and after the complt lost said land at Nelson Court said SIMMONS gave up said contract and the complt went and lived on said land. Q. (by same) From the best of your knowledge where did Michael TROUTMAN since decd sell part of said land to Richard SIMMONS who willed the same to his William SIMMONS. A. About the month of August 1808. Q. (by same) How much and what part of said land was so sold and at what price. A. The part so sold of said land is on the lower side of the said tract on Dry Run and its waters and was sold at five dollars per acre and I suppose the quantity sold was upwards of one hundred acres. Q. (by same)What did you hear said Michael TROUTMAN say were the terms of which he got a deed for said 500 acres of land from the complt and when. A. I was at said TROUTMAN’s house after he got said deed and before he sold part of said 500 acres of sd land to said SIMMONS. Said TROUTMAN and myself rode together until we came to Nathaniel HARRIS’ plantation. Said TROUTMAN stated that he wanted to get that plantation, and as well as I can recollect said he expected to get it. I observed that he had got GAITHER’s plantation. He replied he had not, that he had given the old man four years to pay the money. I told said TROUTMAN that I had seen the bond for the reconveyance. He said that the old man must spunk up in that time. He said that said SIMMONS was too hard with GAITHER, that he went one morning to see said Richard SIMMONS to get him to wait a while for his money & that sd. SIMMONS turned his back on him and would not hear him, that said TROUTMAN had to take CARRICO’s money and pay said SIMMONS, which said TROUTMAN stated was sixty-two pounds ten shillings as well as I recollect and I am sure it did not exceed that sum and I understood from the conversation with said TROUTMAN that he had not purchased said land but had it in security for said money as under a mortgage. I then remarked to said TROUTMAN that the said land had been in dispute with TILFORD, but there was another claim on it in the name of Ben EDWARDS, that I assisted to carry the chain in surveying it, and I thought it was a special entry. Said TROUTMAN was silent for some time and then said, Joe, how did EADES come by them negroes? I replied I did not know, and he answered: By God, he did not think EADES paid money for them Q. (by same) What did you hear Michael TROUTMAN say and at what time about BRASHEAR and CROW cutting timber on the part of said 500 acres of land sold by said TROUTMAN to said SIMMONS. A. After the said purchase by the said SIMMONS from TROUTMAN I understood that BRASHEAR and CROW had cut timber on said purchase by permission and direction of the cmplt. I was at the house of sd SIMMONS and he complained very much of said cutting of timber, and started very early next morning to go to sd. TROUTMAN’s, and I went to his, sd. TROUTMAN’ mill, where said TROUTMAN was. He addressed himself to me and said, Joe, your father, SIMMONS, was at my house this morning and tore up or liked to tear up the plantation about said cutting of timber, like it was damned wrong for GAITHER to let them fellow cut timber there when he said TROUTMAN had sold that part of said land to said SIMMONS, and told me to tell said GAITHER to drive them fellows off and he would satisfy him said GAITHER for that part of said land. Q. (by same) What was the said 500 acres of land worth on the 27th day of July 1804. A. I heard Abraham TROUTMAN, one of the defendants say that the land was worth 6 dollars per acre, and I consider that the land was worth more when it was put in said TROUTMAN’s hands than it is at this time. I also heard Michael TROUTMAN say that he would reconvey all the land back again except the land sold by the sheriff, which land lay next to said TROUTMAN’s mil on the upper side of the said 500 acres and that Phillip TROUTMAN, one of the defendants, did say that the land was worth three thousand dollars and that if it was clear of dispute he could get that for it. Q. (by deft) Are you or are you not interested in this suit. A. I am not. Joseph SIMMONS Dept. Jacob PEACOCK, Bullitt Co. 1 June 1816 Q. (by deft) Did you or did you not hear from John R. GAITHER the complainant say that there was a contract between Michael TROUTMAN decd concerning a tract of land whereon the said GAITHER now lives, and said GAITHER. A. I did hear said GAITHER say that there was a contract between them respecting the land. Q. (by same) What conversation took place at the time between said GAITHER and yourself concerning said land. A. Mr. GAITHER informed me that Michael TROUTMAN in his lifetime and himself had contracted in some way concerning said land and that said TROUTMAN had lent or let him said GAITHER have a sum of money but do not recollect that he mentioned what sum and that said TROUTMAN was not to sell or convey said land for the term of four years but did sell part of said land before the four years was expired and sold the same for more money than said TROUTMAN refunded to him. J. PEACOCK Depo. Leonard TROUTMAN, Nelson County, 27 July 1818 Q. (by Phillip Troutman) Is not the account as sworn before Henry S. BELL, a justice of the peace for Nelson County for the sum of twenty five pounds, twelve shillings commencing on the 15th day of November 1798 and ending in the year 1800 just and correct to your own knowledge A. Yes it is. Leonard TROUTMAN Depo. Jacob TROUTMAN, house of ABraham TROUTMAN, Bullitt Co., 10 Aug. 1816. Q. (by Phillip Troutman) Is not the account due to Michael TROUTMAN, decd. >From John R. GAITHER for the amount of L10..10..10 just and true commencing in the year 1808 and ending in the year 1811. A. Yes it is to the best of my knowledge and recollection. Jacob TROUTMAN Depo. Revd. Willam DeROHAN taken at the house of Stephin T. BADIN in Washington County, 12 Aug. 1816. Q. ( by John R. Gaither) Did you write the bond now in your hands signed by Michael TROUTMAN, dated the 27th July 1804 and witnessed by ABraham TROUTMAN, Robert BRISCOE and William DeROHAN. A. Yes at the request of Michael TROUTMAN decd & John R. GAITHER Q. (by same) Did you also write the deed in your hands from me to sd. TROUTMAN & his heirs, dated the 27th July 1804 and witnessed by the same persons as the bond. A. Yes I did. Q. (by same) Was the afsd deed to Michael TROUTMAN given as security for money lent and advanced by him to me, and was it considered as a mortgage only and not as an absolute conveyance? A. The deed was made from you to TROUTMAN for money and property advanced and lent by TROUTMAN to GAITHER, and if the four hundred pounds was paid to the said GAITHER by the said TROUTMAN including money and property advanced and lent, after the expiration of four years from the date of said bond and deed, I considered that the deed would be permanent. I also considered that John R. GAITHER had four years to refund the money, interest & property advanced and lent him by TROUTMAN & save his land. Q. (by same) How much money was paid me by TROUTMAN when the deed was executed. A. I did not see any money paid at that time, but understood from both parties that GAITHER was indebted to TROUTMAN considerably. Q. (by Phillip Troutman) Are you not well acquainted with Abraham TROUTMAN, one other of the executors and his handwriting and is not his signature as a witness to the bond & deed above identified in his own handwriting? A. I am well acquainted with him and his handwriting and it is his own handwriting. Willm de ROHAN Depo. ABraham TROUTMAN, Bullitt Co., 10 Aug. 1816 Q (by Phillip Troutman) Did not John R. GAITHER or did he not acknoledge to a deed given to Michael TROUTMAN in his lifetime for the plantation he now lives on. A. He did on the 27th day of July 1804 and acknowledge it to be his act of deed. Q. ( by same) Did not Michael TROUTMAN decd or did he not enter into a contract with John R. GAITHER that within the term of four years, if the said GAITHER, should pay unto the said TROUTMAN all accouns and notes which should be established against him, that in such case the sd. Michael TROUTMAN should convey said tract of land back unto the said GAITHER. A. I witnessed a contract to that effect on the 27th day of July 1804 and which I believe the sum never has been paid. Q. (by same) Did or did you not hear John R. GAITHER say whether the hundred acres that was sold by the sheriff should be joined to the plantation which Michael TROUTMAN decd. Sold to Richard SIMMONS or not. A. To the best of my recollection I did hear him say it would make very little difference with him since the sale of the land made by the sheriff. Q. (by same) Is or is not the account from the year 1800 in May for 100 pounds 14 shillings and 4 pence until the year 1807 just and true. A. It is just as far as I recollect to the best of my knowledge. ABraham TROUTMAN ------------------------------ From: Maria Troutman Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:59:52 +0200 Subject: KY-F: Gaither vs. Troutman, Bullitt Co, pt 4 of 5 Depo. Elizabeth HALL, taken at the house of Abraham Troutman, Bullitt Co. 8 Feb. 1817 Q. (by Phillip Troutman) Did you not hear John R. GAITHER and Michael TROUTMAN in the sd. TROUTMAN’ lifetime speak of a contract that took place between them on the 27th day of July 1804 concerning the land sd. GAITHER now lives on. A. Yes I did before and after. Q (by same) What was the contents of the contract between them as you heard them say. A. I heard them both say that they had closed their bargain after it took place that GAITHER had made a deed to TROUTMAN of the land and TROUTMAN had given him a bond provided the said GAITHER would pay unto sd. TROUTMAN all the money with interest that he had paid for him in the term of four years the deed was void if not sd. TROUTMAN was to give sd. GAITHER four hundred pounds for the land which was a fair sale as I understood them both. Q. (by same) Do you not recollect after the contract took place that there came an olde execution than the deed it was levied on one hundred acres of sd. Land and sd. TROUTMAN bought it and was it not before the four years was run out. A. Yes, there was an execution came that was older than the deed that sd. TROUTMAN got of GAITHER and it was before the four years was out as well as I recollect. Q. (by same) Did you not hear John R. GAITHER say that he thought that TROUTMAN had sold one hundred acres of his land to SIMMONS. A. Yes I did hear him say that TROUTMAN had sold one hundred acres to SIMMONS but he said TROUTMAN had a claim on the land & he also said that him and TROUTMAN had agreed that they would see who had the best claim on the hundred acres that sd. TROUTMAN sold to SIMMONS and he said likewise that if his right was better than TROUTMAN’s that the hundred acres that TROUTMAN bought at Sheriff’s sale should answer on the same place when they come to a settlement. Q. (by same) Did you now hear John R. GAITHER say since the expiration of the four years that TROUTMAN gave his bond to GAITHER provided he paid the money that sd. TROUTMAN had paid for him with the interest, then the deed was void and that he did not get the money and could not pay it that he said the land was TROUTMAN’s. A. Yes I did and sd. GAITHER said that the land was TROUTMAN’s as soon as he paid him up the balance that was due to him of the four hundred pounds but he said also that he would wait with TROUTMAN because he befriended him and I heard TROUTMAN tell GAITHER that he need not be uneasy, I shall not pretend to move you of said land as long as you and your old lady lives or at any rate I never shall as long as I live. Q. (by complt) Was you not the wife of Michael TROUTMAn decd at the time of his death? A. Yes Q. (by same) Are not Leonard TROUTMAN, Abraham TROUTMAN, & Jacob TROUTMAN sons of sd. Michael TROUTMAN decd & is not John PATTERSON son in law to the sd. TROUTMAN decd., and is his wife not living now as far as you know. A. Abraham & Jacob TROUTMAN is and Leonard TROUTMAN goes by the name of his son. Q. (by same) How old is Abraham TROUTMAN A. He is upwards of thirty. I believe between thirty & thirty two years of age. Q. (by same) Who kept the books for Michael TROUTMAN decd fourteen or fifteen yers before his death? A. Either Leonard or Abraham TROUTMAN kept his books. Q. (by same) Are you not named in the will & did you not receive land and other property during life agreeable to sd. will. A. Yes, I received the land I now live on & other property. Q. (by deft P. Troutman) Is not the afsd tract of land that John R. GAITHER deeded to Michael TROUTMAN willed to me by the sd. Michael TROUTMAN A. It is agreeable to the will Q. (by plaintiff) Are not Leonard TROUTMAN, Abraham TROUTMAN, & Jacob TROUTMAN named in the will of Michael TROUTMAN decd on account of which naming were they not to receive some property of have they not recd their portion assigned them or a part thereof? A. Yes, Abraham & Jacob TROUTMAN have recd a part and Leonard is to receive his part at my death. Her Elizabeth X Hall Mark Depo. Robert BRISCOE, Bullitt Co., 16 Sept. 1815, who says that on the 27th day of July 1804, John R. GAITHER came to this deponents house and stated to him that Richard SIMMONS (who had an execution against sd. GAITHER) had directed the Sheriff in writing to take the land of sd. GAITHER commencing opposite the mouth of Floyd’s Fork and running up and out for quantity which he expected would in & about cover his improved land and that he was in a great strait for money and had a thought to go to TROUTMAN’s and & see if he could make a friend of him and requested this deponent to go with him; accordingly they went and when there, GAITHER made his case known to TROUTMAN and proposed that if he would lend him the money, to give the land in security - - A mortgage and deed were talked of but it was finally agreed that a deed would be more correct and that TROUTMAN should give GAITHER a bond to redeed the land to GAITHER provided the money was paid back to TROUTMAN in four year; that no advantages were to be taken by TROUTMAN. After which agreement GAITHER deeded the land to TROUTMAN and TROUTMAN gave his bond to GAITHER baring date as stated in this deposition. Q. (by complt) Was you not a witness to the deed and bond spoken of and was there any money paid at that time? A. I was a witness to the deed and bond both in the same day. There was no money paid in my presence at that time or any other time. Q. (by deft) Did not Michael TROUTMAN agree to settle an execution then in the hands of the Sheriff for a sum of money due Richard SIMMONS from John R. GAITHER. A. He did agree to do so. Robert BRISCOE Depo. Samuel SIMMONS, Bullitt county, 6 Sept 1816, house of Elemelich SWEARINGEN. Q. ( by complt) What do you think 500 acres of land where John R. GAITHER now lives was worth per acre on the 27th day of July 1806? A. I think it was worth six dollars per acre. Q. (by same) Do you not recollect that on the 27th day of July 1806 that your father bought a certain tract or parcel of land of Michael TROUTMAN - and did not you understand that the said land run foul of John R. GAITHER’s land? A. I recollect that on the 27th July 1806 that my father did purchase four hundred and forty four acres of land from Michael TROUTMAN and that I understood that part run foul of John R. GAITHER’s land. Q. (by same) What did your father give Michael TROUTMAN per acre for said land? A. He gave him five dollars per acre. Samuel SIMMONS Depo. Rachel SLIGAR, taken at the house of Elemilich SWEARINGEN, Bullitt Co., 18 Feb. 1817. Q. (by complt) Do you suppose that you had the just credit in Michael TROUTMAN’s decd books in his lifetime? A. I think not. Q. (by same) Did not the executors of Michael TROUTMAN warrant you for a sum of money which was paid and a receipt produced paid in full? A. Yes. Her Rachel X SLIGAR mark Depo. Laurence BISHOP, same place, 20 Feb. 1817. Q. ( by complt) Do you think that Michael TROUTMAN in his lifetime dealt fairly with you with his accounts against you? A. No Q. (by same) In what manner did the sd. TROUTMAN deal unfairly with you? A. I sold him 20 barrels and never could get pay from him until I warranted him. After warranting him for the barrels, said TROUTMAN brought his son Abraham as a witness for him concerning the contract with his father and myself, which said Abraham to my certain knowledge knew nothing about the contract although he swore hard in favor of his father against me. Laurence BISHOP Depo. Nicholas CRIST Jr., same plce, 18 Feb. 1817. Q/ (by comptl) Do you suppose that you had the just credit in Michael TROUTMAN’s decd. Books in his lifetime? A. I think not. Q. (by same) In what way do you suppose that you did not get your just credit? A. I was warranted on several notes from me to Michael TROUTMAN which I afterwards proved paid. Q. (by same) Were you not warranted by the executors of Michael TROUTMAN dec. A. Yes and by bo other person on that account? (bo =a typo they made from the original?) Q. ( by same) Did you not prove your credits which ought to have been given and by whom? A. I did and by John LEERIGHT Q. ( by same) Did you not understand generally that the books of Michael TROUTMAN was not regularly kept? A. I have heard people talk so but I do not recollect whom. N. CRIST Jr. Dep. John LEERIGHT, same place, 20 Feb. 1817 Q. ( by complt) Do you recollect of having any dealings with Michael TROUTMAN books? A. Yes, a good deal of dealings. Q. (by same) Do you suppose you had your just credits given you on Michael TROUTMAN’s books? A. No, I had not. Q. (by same) In what way do you suppose you had not your just credits given in the book? A. The heirs of Michael TROUTMAN brought three warrants against me amounting between 40 and sixty dollars, and after laying his accounts before the magistrate, attempted to take up his accounts, but I insisted that it should lay for trial. I produced my account against the said heirs or estate which amounted to about three hundred dollars which said heirs denied every cent of the same. I then summoned witnesses to prove every item I had in charge, by which I brought them in debt to the amount of between forty and sixty dollars. Q. (by same) Was there any credit given you in the books of Michael TROUTMAN A. The executors informed me that their father owed me nothing and there was no credits given more than was on the account laid on table as before stated that one of them attempted to take up, namely Phillip TROUTMAN. Jno. LEERIGHT Depo. Brittain WHITE, same place & time. Q. (by complt) Do you think that you was fairly dealt by, by the books and accounts of Michael TROUTMAN decd? A. I do not know. I never saw the books. Michael TROUTMAN in his lifetime brought a warrant against me for a small sum of money and that Abraham TROUTMAN proved the account and to my certain knowledge that said Abraham was not present when I got the articles charge to me by Michael TROUTMAN his father. Q. ( by same) Did the leather you got from Michael TROUTMAN hold out weight which you generally got from him? A. No, it generally lost in a side of sole leather from two to three pounds. Q. (by same) Do you not understand that TROUTMAN’s books and accounts is generally disputed? A. I understand latterly that they are disputed. Brittain WHITE Depo. Elemelich SWEARINGEN, same place, 20 Feb. 1817, Q ( by complt) Was Michael TROUTMAN’s books brought before you or at your house for inspection agreeable to notice. A. No, they were not. Q. ( by same) Was not Michael TROUTMAN’s books once brought before you in his lifetime A. Yes. Q. (by same) Do you think that the books was kept in good order A. From what little examination I made in the books, my impression is that they were not kept as books ought or might be kept. Elemelich SWEARINGEN Depo. Levy SIMMONS, same place, 18 Feb. 1817 Q. ( by complt) Do you believe that you was fairly dealt by in your dealings with Michael TROUTMAN’s books in his lifetime and after by his executors. A. I do not know but in the lifetime of Michael TROUTMAN decd but I was fairly dealt by as to his books, but by his executors I was not fairly dealt by, which I am fully satisfied as to myself. Q. (by same) In what manner do you think that you were not fairly dealt by the executors. A. The executors of Michael TROUTMAN decd served a warrant on me or had it served to the amount of nine or nine and a half dollars, but when I had the regular credits given by one of the executors, namely Abraham TROUTMAN, was the sum on only abut twenty two and nine pence. Q. ( by same) Did you not understand genearlly that the books of Michael TROUTMAN was not regularly kept? A. I have heard people talk so but I do not recollect whom. Levy SIMMONS Depo. Rebecca SIMMONS, same place, 9 Sept. 1816 Q. (by complt) Did Michael TROUTMAN decd ever get a gray mare of me, and if he did at what price? A. Yes, he did get a gray mare of you, and to the best of my recollection, the price agreed on between yourself and said TROUTMAN was seventy eight dollars. Q. (by same) Do you recollect what year it was in which said TROUTMAN got said gray mare of me? A. I do not. Q. (by same) Did said TROUTMAN ever get any cattle or sheep or both of me, and do you recollect how many? A. To the best of my recollection said TROUTMAN got three cows & 3 calves of you, and eleven sheep. Q. (by same) Do you recollect the year in which said TROUTMAN got those cattle and sheep of me? A. I do not. Rebekah SIMMONS ------------------------------ End of ky-footsteps V1 #363 *************************** USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free genelaogical information on the Internet, data may be freely used for personal research and by non-commercial entities as long as this message remains on all copied material. These electronic pages may not be reproduced in any format or presentation by other organizations or persons.Persons or organizations desiring to use this material for profit or any form of presentation, must obtain the written consent of the file submitter, or his legal representative and then contact the listed USGENWEB archivist with proof of this consent.