Memorial Edition. Life and Work of James G. Blaine. INTRODUCTION ==================================================================== USGENWEB ARCHIVES NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free information on the Internet, data may be used by non-commercial entities, as long as this message remains on all copied material. These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or for presentation by other persons or organizations. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material for purposes other than stated above must obtain the written consent of the file contributor. This file was contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by: Tina S. Vickery ==================================================================== Memorial Edition. Life and Work of James G. Blaine. by John Clark Ridpath, LL. D., General Selden Connor, Ex-Governor of Maine, and other eminent friends of Mr. Blaine. A National Gallery of Pictures and Portraits. Philadelphia: Historical Publishing Company 1893. Copyright, 1893, by H. S. Smith. (All Rights Reserved.) pages xxv - xxxii BLAINE - A TYPE. Every age has produced its typical men. Every country has had them and has profited by them. The type men stand higher than the multitude. They are to the masses what the composite photograph is to the many faces that give it character. The philosophy of the photograph is this: it expresses the common and, therefore, the perfected humanity of all. It presents the average humanity, and at the same time the highest He who has given close attention to the character of the composite will be surprised to find in it the existence of all, and to note, what is much more important, namely, the sublimation of all into spirituality and beauty, It is possible to take a large group of persons and to transform their faces into one, so that that one shall be at once beautiful and spiritual suggesting the fine faces of the old masters. It is thus in the type-man of a given period. He is its average expression, and at the same time its highest expression. In the nature of the case he must be one of many. There is a curious sentiment of Lavater, that the proportion of genius to the vulgar is like one to a million; but genius without tyranny, without pretension, that genius which judges the weak with equity, the superior with humanity, and equals with justice, is like one to ten millions! Certain it is that we cannot look upon a really great man without advantage to ourselves. The more we study him the greater will be our profit from observation and knowledge of his methods, deeds and thoughts. For us the man of the epoch is a living light-fountain, which it is good and pleasant to be near; a light which lightens the dark places of the world and the gloom of human hearts; and this, not as a kindled lamp only, but rather as a natural luminary, shining by the grace of the spirit; a brilliant source of native, original inspiration, of manhood, and heroism, in whose radiance all minds are cheered and ennobled. In the world's records the typical men are not too plentiful. The history of some is interleaved with the annals of those times called barbaric, and of the dark ages back of barbarism; but even then they sowed the seeds of that civilization which has fructified and flourished in the liberal enlightenment of the present day. From the earliest ages of human history the type-men have appeared here and there. They have come according to the demands of the given age. Sometimes they have appeared in the midst of sorrows, wars and pestilence. Sometimes they have come as the redressers of wrong. In one age the type-man is Alexander or Socrates. Sometimes the type-man is a conqueror, and sometimes a martyr for truth. Sometimes he lives and flourishes, and anon he dies. In all cases his life enters into the life of the epoch and is transmitted to after ages. Far back in the centuries the type-men appear as the topmost points of light in the landscape of the world. In such ages the deeds and lives of the type men are substantially the history of the times in which they live. What they accomplished becomes the most instructive part of human annals. How much interest, for example, would the history of the eighth century possess for the reader of to-day were the achievements of Charlemagne omitted? He it was whose master-mind laid the first solid foundation for a permanent system of government and institutions in an age of doubt and darkness. He was the author of many of the best laws of mediaeval Europe. He was the promoter of the best elements of civilization. Succeeding to an empire torn by intestine feuds, he checked its turbulence with vigor and address; compelled the recognition of national law; inspired the wide circuit of Europe with a common interest and common objects, and led men to pursue these interests and to maintain these objects with collective counsel as well as with united efforts. This great Middle-Age type-man founded the original of all royal societies and academies, and was the first to combine in one military monarchy a feudal nobility, a somewhat free commons and a kind of constitutional assembly of States. He may be regarded as the father of the modern State system of Europe. He has claims, which are universally acknowledged, to the regard and veneration of the ages which have benefited from his doings and his life. The world dates a new era from his wise and beneficent reign. Insensibly it may be, but. surely, his spirit pervades the thoughts and politics of all modern nations,, teaching them, by precept and example which cannot be too highly esteemed, how best to pursue the gradual paths of an aspiring change. It were possible to select example after example of the typical 11 e among the various peoples who have risen and flourished in Western Europe. France, Germany, England, Italy have abounded in characters of this kind. From the day of Godfrey to the day of Count Cavour; from Richelieu to Gambetta; from Cromwell to Wellington; from Barbarossa, to Bismarck, we find such characters. standing here and there, lifted somewhat above their age, but expressing its common hope as well as its loftiest purpose. In like manner the history of our own country has been adorned with the names of type-men as great as the greatest. The student of American annals. need not seek far to find such names and to share the common glory which they have diffused in the Western Hemisphere, and indeed throughout the world. It was our good fortune to begin our active governmental life as a, people under the influence and guidance of one such a man. Washington was in every sense the expression of the common hope of our colonial Americans, and at the same time the expression of the highest honor, loyalty and patriotism of that period in history. He was a man whose judgment was ripened by the most arduous experience in the struggle for his country's independence whose intelligence was comprehensive and admirably adapted to the exigencies of his administration. Every word of high encomium yet applied to man belongs to him; for in his eyes duty was the law of correct life; duty, the upholding principle through which the weakest become strong; without which all strength is unstable as water. Washington believed that the conviction of duty implies the soundest reason, the strongest obligation of which our nature is susceptible, and while " he stood firm before the. thunder, he yet worshiped the still, small voice." Duty he regarded as the prompting of conscience. Washington was a conscientious man; and his intelligence directed conceptions of duty to heroic deeds. An auspicious occasion assisted him; but any occasion for the exercise of heroism would have proved equally auspicious. Patriotism, nobility and soldiership are all synonyms of duty, and these qualities culminated in his life. He was the man of the eighteenth century, as was Charlemagne of the eighth-not so much by force of his genius as by his purity and trustworthiness. He was faithful in small things as well as in great. Every talent conferred upon him was put to the best possible use. He followed the dictates of conscience whatever way they led. " Honest, truthful, diligent," were the catch-words of his creed. His best products, as are those of all deliberate men, were happy and sanctifying thoughts, which, when once formed and put into practice, are capable of extending their fertilizing influence from generation to generation for thousands of years. The life of Washington has been so often written that it is unnecessary in this place to refer to it further than to point out the thorough conscientiousness, the self- sacrificing spirit, the purity of motive with which he enter', upon and carried to completion the liberation and independence of his country No man could be more pure, no man more self- denying. In victory he was self-controlled; in defeat, unshaken. Throughout he was magnanimous and pur( In his life it is difficult to learn which to admire most ardently, the nobility of his character, the firmness of his patriotism, or the purity of his conduct but the combination made him a man of divine temper, and " take him for al in all," it is not to be expected that we shall look upon his like again. The intermediate period in our country's history is not wanting in met worthy to be the successors of the great archetypes of the revolutionary age It would appear that statesmanship in America at length succeeded to the sword The violence of our first age was succeeded by the intellectual contests of the second period. The first age had been the age of the making of the constitution. The second age was the period of the interpretation and application of the constitution. It was an age of adjustments and adaptations, The institutions of the country had been formed theoretically in expectation of national wants and conditions. At length the genius of America arose and must be fitted to the work of the fathers. That work had to be interpreted for the American mind, and adjusted to the facts which had arisen spontaneously in the second quarter of our century. The interpreters were the type-men of that age. They were great in their kind. The fame of Webster and Clay, of Calhoun and Benton was well earned in the contentions of a great arena. They were the successors of Hamilton and Marshall. They filled up a large part of the public histories of our country -for a considerable section of time. They shone with peculiar lustre through all the domains of the expanding Republic, and were seen from remote distance across the seas. Already the American name had been recognized for a half century or more in the highest circles of European thought and purpose. Franklin had made us great, not only in Prance, but throughout Western Europe. Just as the type-men of the fourth and fifth decades took the character of publicists, jurists and orators-turning as it were the reverse civil side of American life to the obverse side of war-so the obverse side came again with the epoch ,of disunion. Then arose a new class of statesmen and public men. just as the old style of literary production had given place to new creative methods. conforming more strictly to the American genius, and less assimilated to British models, so a new type of men arose, strictly American, great in stature, patriotic and powerful. Of this kind was the immortal Lincoln. His greatness, both intellectual and moral, was as gigantic as it was inexplicable. E'en to the dullest peasant standing by, Who fasten'd still on him a wondering eye, He seemed the master-spirit of the land." He was incomparable, and his character and achievements more difficult of analysis than those of any American in history. The great charms of the man were his honesty, geniality and faithfulness, and these will always remain the pre-eminent charms of our poor humanity. But we must not forget that Lincoln encountered obstacles, assumed duties, and cast out impediments which were entirely unknown to American citizenship previous to his time. Difficulties and calamities sharpened his apprehension, and called into activity all the faculties of his powerful intellect. His mind was brightest in disaster-most alert under defeat. It has been said that Madame de Maintenon would never have approached a throne had not her cradle been rocked in a prison. So with hundreds who have risen to greatness. There was needed something in their path before they could rise to the gaze of the world. Difficulties are a mere stimulus to men like Lincoln, supplying the discipline which greatly assists their onward and upward course. He, like thousands of great men before him, was a disciple of Plato, but, perhaps, unconsciously so; at any rate he followed the advice of that wonderful philosopher, " Let men of all ranks, whether they are successful or unsuccessful, rest satisfied." But the qualities of Lincoln most difficult of analysis were those which compelled the admiration and respect of the civilized world ; which conquered the prejudices of political opponents, and commanded the love of all who knew him personally. Said a Virginian who had called upon him at the prompting of idle curiosity: " I believe he is the greatest man in the world. When I went there I expected to find a fellow to make fun of ; but I am the one to laugh at I He knows more about my State than I do, and I was born in 'Old Virginia,' and thought I knew all about her." The incident appears simple in the reading, but it illustrates the power of Lincoln over every mind with which he came in contact. And this is the power no one has yet attempted to analyze, although some observers call it "personal magnetism," and seem content to pass it without attempting explanation. It was possessed in a large degree by Henry Clay, and attracted the people toward him like the obedient steel which turns forever to the pole. Garfield had the same power in a degree which remains a wonder to his friends ; and Blaine was endowed with it almost beyond precedent or example. It is the magnetism-if that is the proper term-of intellectual supremacy; the regality of mind which is apparent to the world, but of which the possessor is unconscious; which cannot result from instruction, but is self-born and springs up in the midst of disadvantages. It works its solitary but irresistible way through all obstacles, while nature seems to delight in disappointing the assiduities with which art seeks to convert dullness to brilliancy. Nature scatters the seeds of genius to the winds; and though some may perish among the stony places of the world, and some may be choked by the thorns and brambles of early adversity, yet others will now and then strike root even in the clefts of the rock, struggle bravely up into the sunshine, and spread over their sterile birthplace all the beauties of vegetation. Although genius may be conscious of its advantages in minds like those referred to, it is rarely aware of its superiority to associate minds; its achievements which others celebrate are frequently but its ordinary performances. One of the highest forms of human force is that which combines military genius with statesmanship. It is as it were the union of physical agencies with thought-the combination of body and spirit. This form of force was ,exemplified in many of our type-men in the epoch under consideration. A few were statesmen pure and simple. A still larger number were military leaders quite innocent of civic abilities. But many have the combination of both powers. Such men are at once the glory and the menace of their, country. When history presents a character combining in itself the genius of the military captain with the genius of statesmanship, and the union is inflamed with ambition, the resultant personage is likely to be the pride and the danger of his age. This is true in particular of democracies and republics. Fortunately, however, if the republic be one of intelligence and virtue, if it be dominated by the aristocracy of patriotism, the danger from such source is reduced to a minimum. Many of our statesmen of the civil war period might have been successful generals in the field. Some successful generals showed themselves to be also men of the cabinet. Not a few had great ambitions; but it does not appear that a single one had the ambition or desire-to say nothing of the power to subvert his country. It was in this great group of type-men that James G. Blaine made his appearance. He came in the guise of a statesman. He appeared as a type of the American statesman's life and character. We shall have occasion in another part to dwell upon the fact that Blaine was distinctively a man of civil propensities. We call such a civilian, to distinguish him from the military leader. It is clear that Blaine did not possess military talents; or if he possessed any gift in that direction, it was not conspicuous. His was the genius for civil affairs. He had the instincts and biases of the political and popular leader. He was the type-man of the hustings and the House. Let us dwell upon and emphasize this truth as it is fundamental to the consideration of Blaine's character and worth. It is well to begin a biography with the discovery and exposition of the dominant fact in the life of the personage under consideration. A man's life begins with his spirit, his purpose, his passion rather than with his birth. We should seize, first of all, the leading trait of the man,' and allow all the rest to form itself around this central nerve of will and personality. Blaine was a civilian-a great civilian. That is the key to his character and work. He was a man of civil affairs. For this work he had a genius and passion. This element of action and desire expressed itself in the first movements of his youthful career and continued to inspire him until, in his last days, he saw the lingering sunset reflected from the dome of the Capitol. Not only is this the fundamental characteristic of Blaine's personality and place in history, but it is the essential of the type which he represents. American life is largely-perhaps too largely --- civil and political. It were well if the political passion were not so strong upon us. But it remains true that our sixty-five millions sway and bend and fluctuate under the passions and motions of the political life. It is thus not far from true to regard the politician as the typical American. If thus much be conceded, then James G. Blaine may almost be regarded as the highest type of American citizen and leader. This is to say, that he has expressed in his life -and activities a larger part of the common life and the common activities of his countrymen than almost any other. Mark the singleness of his career. Though that career has been multifarious, though it has run deviously, it has nevertheless been as single as it is singular. Blaine would be a great statesman. He would rise to the rank of first statesman of the age. However much his ship may have been tossed on stormy seas, however much the skies may at times have been draped with thick and impenetrable clouds, he nevertheless kept ever his eye to the North Star, or to that part of his heavens where he thought the North Star was hidden. We thus find in the great type-character of which we are to speak in the following pages a singular unity as well as persistency of purpose. Let us premise that Blaine for the present hour is suffering as much from the hurts and obscurations of contemporaneity as he is glorified by the current sympathies and admiration of his countrymen. We may not as yet discover precisely how he will be revealed to the men of the next age. He may be exalted, and he may suffer loss. Clay and Webster died forty years ago. Their respective, statures have been revealed since their going. True, they had the admiration of their contemporaries when they passed away; but the true estimate has come afterward. So it will be with Blaine. Nearness for the present hour blurs the vision. There is spherical and chromatic aberration-optical illusions not a few-as we turn our vision to the life and work of this remarkable personage. Only a few things are clear and distinct. One is, that he held a large share of the interest and admiration of his countrymen for more than a score of years. Another is, that he will, in a larger or lesser measure, be regarded hereafter as one of the principal type-men of the greatest epoch which has thus far arisen in American history. From this point of view we desire to narrate his life and work. Not without both interest and esteem for the man and his great part in the public events of the last quarter of a century do we enter upon the task of recording as much as may at present be gleaned respecting his personal life and his conspicuous and dramatic action in the arena of our nationality.