Resolve on the petition of John Neal and others of Litchfield, Maine, January 26th, 1820 Sprague's Journal of Maine History Volume VII Aug. Sept. Oct. 1919 No. 2 page 96 RESOLVES PASSED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS LEGISLATURE 1818-1820, RELATING TO MAINE. Resolve on the petition of John Neal and others. January 26th, 1820 On the petition of John Neal, John Dennis, Jesse Pike, Daniel Ring, Junior, Joshua W. Watson, and David C. Burr all of Litchfield, in the county of Lincoln, representing that they have been united in matrimony with their present wives, viz: John Neal with Polly Hutchinson, John Dennis with Betsey Walker, Jesse Pike with Sally True, (since deceased,) Daniel Ring, Junior, with Betsey Dennis, Joshua W. Watson with Judith Tibbetts, and David C. Burr with Catherine Fuller, having a lawful right to do, and their intentions accordingly having been legally published, by the Town Clerk, of said Town of Litchfield, and that they have severally been married by Ministers of the Baptist or Methodist order, who were regularly ordained, according to the rules of said Societies, as Ministers at large; and that doubts have been expressed, respecting the validity of the said marriages: RESOLVED, That the several marriages aforesaid, of the said John Neal, John Dennis, Jesse Pike, Daniel Ring, Junior, Joshua W. Watson, and David C. Burr, solemnized in manner aforesaid, be, and the same are hereby declared legal, and valid, to all intents and purposes of marriages: and the children of the said marriages are hereby declared to be legitimate, as if said marriages are hereby declared to be legitimate, as if said marriages had been solemnized by a person legally empowered for such purpose. ************************************************* * * * * NOTICE: Printing the files within by non-commercial individuals and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices and submitter information is included. Any other use, including copying files to other sites requires permission from the submitters PRIOR to uploading to any other sites. We encourage links to the state and county table of contents. * * * * The USGenWeb Project makes no claims or estimates of the validity of the information submitted and reminds you that each new piece of information must be researched and proved or disproved by weight of evidence. It is always best to consult the original material for verification.