Hainline Court Record - 1827 - Davie County, North Carolina Submitted for use in the USGenWeb Archives by Faye Moran Davie County, N. Carolina Superior Court Spring Term, 1827 Gov the use of Nathan Hainline Vs James Cavender, Adminr of Thomas Hainline des, Joseph Haines, John March Refered to John Clement to take acct. This cause having been refered to me to take an account and report the facts - do respectfully make the following report viz lst - Nathan Hainline, Father of the present (plaintiff) died intestate in the year 1813, leaving his wife, two daughters the (plaintiff) Nathan, and that the two daughters died shortly after their father. 2nd - The said Thomas Hainline entered as administrator on the estate of Nathan Hainline decs, and as appears -- inventory bearing date Nov 30th 1813, Took into his hands of the goods and chattels of the said Nathan Hainline decs, the sum of $288.4.5. 3rd - It appears -- another Inventory filed in Rowan County, August 1815; That the said Thomas Hainline received into his hands as Administrator of the estate of Nathan Hainline decs hands as Administrator of the estate of Nathan Hainline decs the further sum of $332.07 which sum was the distributive share of the said Nathan Hainline decs., then due from the estate of his Father, Jacob Hainline decs, and also includes the amount due from the estate of his brother in law, Andrew Sheets, decs, uncle of the (plaintiff.) 4th - Thomas Hainline was the surviving Executor of Jacob Hainline decs. 5th - It appears -- settlement bearing date the lst July 1824 between Thomas Haneline, Executor of Jacob Hainline decs, (who was the father of Nathan Haneline decs) and John Clement and Thomas McNuly commissioners. That there was at that time in the said Thomas Hainline hands as Executor and due the estate of Nathan Haneline decs the further sum of $580.60, his then distributive share of his Fathers estate, coming from the hire and sale of Negroes as will more fully appear by reference to said settlement. 6th - It does not appear that any Administration ever took place on the estates of the two sisters of the (plaintiff), Nathan Haneline. They died under age an without..... 7th - It appears that Rebecca Hainline daughter of Jacob Hainline decs, sister of Nathan Hainline decs and Aunt of the (plaintiff) Nathan Hainline, died in the year (blank) without issue. 8th - That Thomas Hainline obtained Administration on her estate. 9th - Nathan Hainline the (plaintiff) as one of the distributors and heirs at law, was entitled to the one eleventh part of her estate, being the only representative of his Father in her estate at the time of her decease which share was July the lst 1824, $107.94 as appears from settlements then made with the other Legatees by said Thomas Hainline... it being the amount they rec as their share in said estate. 10th - The foregoing (court?) embraces according to the proofs and exhibits the different estates, and the amount, that the (plaintiff) in this suit is entitled to share in. 11th - It appears that Aquilla Cheshire became the Guardian of Nathan Hainline the (plaintiff) in 1815 or 1816 or 1818 and continued so until 1833 when Thomas Hainline entered as Guardian. 12th - That Nathan Hainline the plaintiff was 21 years old in 1834. 13th - It does not appear that any settlement ever took place between A. Cheshire and Thomas Hainline positively. There appears the claims of different grades and dates held against each other but all Finding to prove no full settlement and none of which seems to be in the Official capacities of dealings between Guardian and Administrator. 14th - It appears by a return made by A. Cheshire, Guardian of the plaintiff in 1817, Nov. Term to Rowan Court, that he charges himself as receiving for his Ward, the seum of $386.67 which is in and about one half that appeared in the hands of Thomas Haneline Adminr. of Nathan Hainline decd., according to the return of the settlement Specified as above, at that time. 5th - At the February Term 1833, Aquilla Cheshire Guardian of the plaintiff Filed an account with his Ward in Rowan Court charging himself with the sum of $356.76 as having come to hand, according to the return made in 1817 and in that account says nothing of having recd from Thomas Hainline the further sum that fell due his ward in the settlement Thomas Hainline filed in 1824 for the hire and sale of Negroes. The settlement of A. Cheshire here allowed by reference to it shows that the expenditures made and commissions charges that the while except seventy five dollars and some cents, were despased (?) of and remains in said Cheshires hands to be accounted for subject to his claims. Upon a full examination of the whole business according to the evidence before me, I respectfully submit the following viz The amount that came in the hands of A. Cheshire, Guardian or which he is accountable is the Following as his return in 1817 to Rowan County. viz $386.76 Compound interest on that sum to 1834 when the plaintiff came of age is $654.60 Simple interest on this amount from the time the plaintiff became of age to this time, say 4 years is $249.92 to October 1838 for which A. Cheshire is Chargeable $1291.28 Subject to his claims for Expenditures and commissions. The following is what Thomas Hainline is chargeable with The amount in which he plaintiff of this suit had an interest, arising from sale of Negroes and hire as ... Thomas Hainline (adm?) filed of Jacob Hainlaine estate in 1824 - $580.50. Compound Interest up to 1834 when the plaintiff became 21 years of age is , say 17 years and 3 months - $474.75. (total $1055.35). Simple interest from that time to October 1838 say 4 years is $253.28 say that the plaintiff is entitled to one hald this amount $1308.63 the other A. Cheshire and his mother, being heirs of his sisters decs. The one half that the plaintiff would be entitled from the foregoing up to October, 1838 and coming from Thomas Haneline estate as there is no evidence that it ever passed out of his hands. $864.31. Together with the following amount as coing from the plaintiff's Aunt Rebecca that was in Thomas Hanelines hands and in 1824. No Evidence that it ever passes from him is $107.94 compound interest up to the time the plaintiff became 21 old in 1834, say 10 years and 3 months $88.36. Simple interest on that from the time the plaintiff became of age to this time, say Oct Term 1838, 4 years $47.08. Total amount that the estate of Thomas Haneline is bound for $897.59. Subject to whatever..... respectful court may deem the estate...... Now for the estate of Thos Hainlin's is bound for the amount reported as having come to the hands of A. Cheshire and not collected by T. Hainline from A. Cheshire. The Referee does not pretend to say whether he should charge the estate of Thomas Hainline with the sum of $75 due the Ward in the hands of A. Cheshire as Cheshire's settlement in 1833 filed in Rowan Court and the Interest on the same is also respectfully submitted to the Wor.... Court. If Hainline estate is chargeable it would make something like $101 more and the aggregate would be $998.59. All of which is respectfully submitted October,. 1838. Jno. Clement. ============================================================= USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free information on the Internet, data may be used by non-commercial entities, as long as this message remains on all copied material. These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or for presentation by other persons or organizations. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material for purposes other than stated above must obtain the written consent of the file contributor. The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb Archives to store the file permanently for free access. =============================================================