Lincoln County NcArchives Court.....A. M. Nixon, Rachel Hager V. 1873 ************************************************ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/nc/ncfiles.htm ************************************************ File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by: Guy Potts http://www.genrecords.net/emailregistry/vols/00017.html#0004214 September 22, 2008, 12:01 pm Source: Nc Reports Written: 1873 RACHEL HAGER et al v. A. M. NIXON and wife et al June Term 1873 A widow cannot, under the Constitution and Act of 1868-69, chap. 137, sec. 10, have a homestead laid off for herself and minor children after the death of her husband when he died without leaving debts. This was a CONTROVERSY without action, submitted to his Honor, Logan, J., Judge of the Ninth Judicial District, at the last term of LINCOLN Superior Court, under the 315th sec. of the C. C. P. The following is the statement of the controversy and the decision of the Judge upon it; 1. John Hager died in Lincoln county in September, 1872, where he resided. At his death he was seized in fee of a tract of land in said county, worth about five hundred dollars, and no other real estate. 2. A. J. Morrison administered on his estate on the 2d day of September, 1872. The time for presenting claims has not yet expired, but as far as known there are no outstanding debts against the estate. 3. The inventory of the administrator shows personal property worth about five hundred dollars. 4. John Hager in his lifetime did not apply to have his homestead allotted to him. 5. John Hager left him surviving, Rachel Hager, his widow, one of the plaintiffs, and Ellen Hager, his daughter, aged 13 years, the other plaintiff, and Rachel Nixon, wife of A. M. Nixon, one of the defendants, aged 22 years, and Jane Hager, a daughter, aged 18 years, who is the other defendant. 6. Rachel Hager, the widow, applies to have the tract of land allotted to her as a homestead for the benefit of herself and minor child, Ellen, who lives with her and for the other children if they desire it, and this application is resisted, and her right to the said homestead denied by the defendants, A. M. Nixon and wife, and Jane Hager, who appears by A. M. Nixon, her guardian. Rachel Hager is the mother of Rachel Nixon and Jane and Ellen Hager, parties to this controversy. It is agreed that the Judge of this Court shall thereupon hear and determine the case, and render judgment therein, as if an action presenting this point were depending before him. W. S. BYNUM, Attorney for plaintiffs. D. SCHENCK, Attorney for defendants. May 1st, 1873. It is the opinion of the Court that Rachel Hager is entitled to the homestead asked for, and that the same be laid off for her according to law. G. W. LOGAN, Judge Superior Court Ninth District. May 3d, 1873. From this judgment the defendants prayed an appeal, which was granted. D. Schenck, for the defendants, contended that the policy and object of the Constitution and laws in relation to homesteads applied only to cases of persons indebted, and were never meant for the benefit of those who did not need them. He cited and commented on Watts v. Leggett, 66 N. C. Rep. 197. W. P. Bynum, for the plaintiffs argued that the homestead was intended for the benefit of the citizen, and that therefore the Constitution and laws relating to it should be construed liberally. If a citizen was indebted to ever so small amount, say $50 or $100, he would be entitled to a homeatead, and to make a distinction between so small a sum, and not being indebted at all, is not at all reasonable. Ruling from NC Supreme Court: RODMAN, J. PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and suit dismissed. File at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/nc/lincoln/court/amnixon885gwl.txt This file has been created by a form at http://www.genrecords.org/ncfiles/ File size: 4.1 Kb