Pender County NcArchives Court.....K. F. Powers, Sheriff, W. W. Miller V. 1895 ************************************************ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/nc/ncfiles.htm ************************************************ File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by: Connie Ardrey n/a January 8, 2010, 5:48 pm Source: Nc Reports Written: 1895 W. W. Miller v. K. F. Powers, Sheriff September Term, 1895 Process - Sheriff's Return - Recitals in Return Prima Facie True The recitals in a sheriff's return of process are prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements therein. Proceeding for amercement of the sheriff of Pender County, heard before Brown, J., at Spring Term, 1894, of Pender Superior Court. On the 6th of February, 1893, an execution was issued upon a judgment in favor of W. W. Miller against George Washington, and W. T. Bannerman, surety on his appeal bond, for the sum of fifty-six dollars and eighteen cents, docketed March 14, 1892, with interest from that date, and the sum of seventy-two dollars and five cents costs. Said execution was delivered to the sheriff's deputy, W. T. Bannerman, by the attorney for the plaintiff on February 6, 1893. On March 15, 1893, being on the third day of March Term, 1893, which convened on March 13, the sheriff returned said execution into this court with the following endorsement: "Returned March 15, 1893. Served on defendant Washington, and two dollars received on the within execution. No fees paid or tendered to lay off the defendant's homestead." The court found that no fees were tendered or paid to set apart the homestead of either of the defendants. The sheriff and his office deputy, W. T. Bannerman, testified that when the execution was filed in the sheriff's office by the plaintiff's attorney, the lawful fees, required by law to be prepaid, were demanded and that the plaintiff's attorney paid only fifty cents, and that, accordingly, the execution was served upon the defendant George Washington, who paid two dollars. That plaintiff refused to pay the fees to set apart the homestead of the defendants, and the sheriff proceeded no further but made the return of the execution aforesaid. The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove that the plaintiff paid to the sheriff's deputy one dollar and fifty cents at the time the execution was filed in the sheriff's office and that nothing more was done. The evidence is very conflicting. The court being of the opinion that the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to show to the court by a preponderance of evidence that he tendered the fees required by law to the sheriff or his deputy when he filed said execution, adjudged that the plaintiff did not tender to the sheriff or his deputy the fees required by law for serving the said execution upon the defendants, and further, that the plaintiff did not tender the fees setting apart the homestead and personal property extensions, and thereupon discharged the rule against the defendant and taxed the plaintiff with the costs of the proceeding. From this judgment the plaintiff appealed. Mr. H. L. Stevens, for plaintiff (appellant) No counsel, contra [NC Supreme Court] Avery, J.: Upon the authorities cited we think there was no error in the ruling complained of and the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Affirmed. [See court case for Judge Avery's complete findings] File at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/nc/pender/court/kfpowers1278wl.txt This file has been created by a form at http://www.poppet.org/ncfiles/ File size: 3.6 Kb