TITLE: Bio, ENOCH O. TASKER SOURCE: History of Strafford County, New Hampshire and Representative Citizens by John Scales, editor Dover Daily Democrat, published by Richmond- Arnold Publishing Co., F.J. Richmond, Pres; C.R. Arnold, Sec and Treas., Chicago, Ill., ©1914 pg 749 - 750 TRANSCRIBED: by C Parziale, Feb 2001 *********************************************************************** ENOCH O. TASKER, who has been an active business man at Dover since 1873, is well known all over Strafford county. He owns an excellent farm of 65 acres in the suburb of Dover but resides in the city, his residence being at No. 16 Prospect Street. He was born March 26, 1847, on Rochester Neck, Strafford county, and is a son of Thomas J. and Comfort (Bickford) Tasker. Thomas J. Tasker was born in Madbury, where his father, Ebenezer Tasker was born, and his ancestors had lived two centuries the immigrant ancestor being William Tasker. Thomas J. Tasker passed the greater part of his life in Rochester, where he was a farmer and also followed the carpenter trade. He was a good farmer, an expert carpenter, an honest man in all his dealings with others and , though not a member, was a worthy supporter of the Free Will Baptist Church at Gonic, of which his wife was a devout member. Having lost his father when six years old, his success in life was creditable in every way and he had the esteem and confidence of all his fellow citizens. He married Comfort Bickford, who was a native of Rochester Neck, and whose immigrant ancestor, Thomas Bickford, was a resident of Dover in 1650. Enoch O. Tasker grew to manhood on Rochester Neck, in the meanwhile being afforded educational advantages, attending Strafford Academy and both public school and a private school at Rochester, so that he was better qualified than many when he started into business for himself in 1873 at Dover. Here he associated himself with his brother, John C. Tasker, in the mercantile business, the firm style being John C. Tasker & Co., which continued from some years and Mr. Tasker remained in the mercantile line for a quarter of a century. When Mr. Tasker and his brother dissolved partnership he entered in the grocery and provision business with Mr. John L. Kimball, July 1, 1886. Mr. Kimball withdrew and Mr. Tasker admitted Mr. Wm. F. Cartland as his partner in the business, which was then conducted in a store on Washington Street, east of the old Strafford Bank building. When Mr. Anderton completed his brick block on Locust Street they removed to that street and occupied the large double store where now Mr. Cartland is located. The firm name was Tasker & Cartland, and became one of the largest grocery and provision dealers in the city. Mr. Tasker retired from the business January 1, 1898, having the esteem and confidence of all his numerous customers and the public in general. In recent years he has given considerable attention to his farming interests and also carries on a teaming business at Dover. On November 12, 1878, Mr. Tasker married Ursula M. Winkley, daughter of Darius Winkley, who for many years conducted a mill at Barrington and was a leading citizen there and widely known. They have three children: Bernice Winkley, who is the wife of N. Arthur Gifford of Somerville, Mass.; Sumner J., who is a resident of San Francisco, Cal.; and Cecil F., who is located in Boston, Mass. Mr. Tasker and family are members of the First Parish, of which Rev. W.A. Morgan is pastor. For many years he has been a member of Mt. Pleasant Lodge I.O.O. F. and practices the professions of that benevolent order in an exemplary manner. **************************************************************************** * * * * Notice: Printing the files within by non-commercial individuals and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices and submitter information is included. Any other use, including copying files to other sites requires permission from submitters PRIOR to uploading to any other sites. We encourage links to the state and county table of contents. * * * * The USGenWeb Project makes no claims or estimates of the validity of the information submitted and reminds you that each new piece of information must be researched and proved or disproved by weight of evidence. It is always best to consult the original material for verification.