Landmarks in Ancient Dover, New Hampshire by Mary P. Thompson, Durham, N.H. ©1892, Printed by the Republican Press Association, Concord, N.H. LANDMARKS: Blind Wills Neck NAMES: BLIND, Will; WALDRON, Major; TIBBETS, Samuel; TIBBETS, Ichabod; YOUNG, Jonathan; HANSON, HUMPHREY; HANSON, Ephraim; SMITH, John Blind Will's Neck. This is a point of land in the south-west part of Rochester, near the Dover line, formed by the junction of the Cochecho and Isinglass rivers. It was here that a friendly Indian sagamore named Blind Will was killed in March, 1677, having been sent with a scouting-party by Major Waldron to watch the movements of some hostile Indians, who fell suddenly upon the party and killed the greater part. This neck is men- tioned March 17, 1736, when Samuel Tibbets conveyed to his son Ichabod a part of his second division in Rochester, "at a place called Blind Will's Neck, lying on ye S.W. of a marsh commonly called Long marsh." And again Dec. 3, 1745, when Jonathan Young of Dover conveyed to his son Jonathan a tract of land "at Blind Will's Neck, at or near two marshes called Long marsh and Great Marsh." Humphrey Hanson conveyed to his brother Ephraim, Oct. 8, 1765, "three acres at Blind Will's Neck, so called, in Rochester, on ye very S.E. point of said Neck, nearly opposite the mouth of Blackwater brook, joining partly to the Isinglass portion of the river, and partly to the Squommonogonock branch," being the land he purchased of John Smith Ap. 27, 1739. PG 26 - Submitted by C. Parziale **************************************************************************** * * * * Notice: Printing the files within by non-commercial individuals and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices and submitter informa- tion is included. Any other use, including copying files to other sites requires permission from submitters PRIOR to uploading to any other sites. We encourage links to the state and county table of contents. * * * * The USGenWeb Project makes no claims or estimates of the validity of the information submitted and reminds you that each new piece of information must be researched and proved or disproved by weight of evidence. It is always best to consult the original material for verification.