Landmarks in Ancient Dover, New Hampshire by Mary P. Thompson, Durham, N.H. ©1892, Printed by the Republican Press Association, Concord, N.H. LANDMARKS: Cedar Point. NAMES: POMFRETT, William; ALLEY, Mrs; JENKINS, Joseph; HANSON, Stephen; GREEN, Ezra; WALLINGFORD, Thomas; This point is so called the 5th, 5 mo., 1652, in the grant of Goat Island to Wm. Pomfrett. It is now owned by Mrs. Alley. It is on the upper shore of the Pascataqua, below the mouth of Oyster river, and at the south- west side of Royall's cove. It is a bound of the three townships of Dover, Durham, and Madbury. When the bounds between Dover and Madbury were perambulated Jan. 19, 1793, the line began "at Cedar point, so called, by the river," then ran north 40 deg., or thereabouts, to the southwest corner of Joseph Jenkin's house, thence north 34½ deg. W. to a beech tree on Stephen Hanson's land, on the north side of the road to Barrington, thence on the same point about 6 ft. from the corner of Dr. Ezra Green's pasture, thence north 34½ deg. W. to the Barrington line. When the line between Durham and Madbury was perambulated Jan 9, 1802, it began at "a long rock on Cedar Pt., so called, on the west side of the back river," marked M. on the north, and D. on the south; thence ran about north 55º, 30' west, to a red oak on the north side of the creek, on land lately belonging to the heirs of Thomas Wallingford, deceased, thence on the same course to the middle of Johnson's creek bridge, thence N. by E. to, and across, Beech hill, and thence to the north-east corner of the town of Lee. PG 40 Submitted by C. Parziale **************************************************************************** * * * * Notice: Printing the files within by non-commercial individuals and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices and submitter informa- tion is included. Any other use, including copying files to other sites requires permission from submitters PRIOR to uploading to any other sites. We encourage links to the state and county table of contents. * * * * The USGenWeb Project makes no claims or estimates of the validity of the information submitted and reminds you that each new piece of information must be researched and proved or disproved by weight of evidence. It is always best to consult the original material for verification.