BIOGRAPHY: James S. T. Stranahan; Brooklyn, Kings co., NY surname: Stranahan, Fitch, Josselyn, Harrison submitted by *********************************************************************** Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/ny/nyfiles.htm *********************************************************************** A HISTORY OF LONG ISLAND FROM ITS EARLIEST SETTLEMENT TO THE PRESENT TIME BY PETER ROSS, LL. D. THE LEWIS PUBLISHING COMPANY NEW YORK AND CHICAGO COPYRIGHT. 1902 JAMES S. T. STRANAHAN True men are the crown jewels of the republic. The very names of the distinguished dead are a continual inspiration and an abiding lesson. The name Garibaldi thrills the sons of Italy; the enthusiasm of the liberty-loving Swiss is aroused by the mention of Hofer; Wallace and Bruce are names which inspire every Scot; and in our own land a feeling of veneration and honor is felt as those of Washington and Lincoln are uttered. This is not only true of those who have advanced the spirit of liberty, but of the men who have broadened the realms of thought; who have opened the fields of knowledge and contributed in any measure to the progress of the world, their efforts redounding to the benefit of their fellow men along the lines of material, intellectual, aesthetic or moral development The work which they perform is a more enduring monument than any which might be erected of stone or bronze, for it wins the enduring love of a grateful people, and the story of their lives is handed down to posterity, and their names are honored throughout time. When the years have become a part of a long vanished past, history throws around the great men of earth an idealization, - in other words, only the resplendent virtues are emphasized; but even in the light of the present, the strong, practical judgment of the day acknowledged the value of the service which James S. T. Stranahan rendered to his fellow men, and the city of Brooklyn largely stands as the visible evidence of a life whose far-reaching influence has affected for good so many of his fellow men. One of the strongest forces in the psychic world is the association of ideas, and to a student of history the city of Brooklyn can not be mentioned without bringing to mind James S. T. Stranahan, who left the impress of his forceful individuality upon almost every line of progress and improvement that has led to the substantial growth and advancement of the city. His life's span covered nine decades - years of purpose well directed, plans carefully formed - an era of splendid achievement His life record began on the 25th of April, 1808, at the old family homestead in Madison county, New York, near Peterboro, his parents being Samuel and Lynch (Josselyn) Stranahan. He traced his lineage to Scotch-Irish ancestry; of Presbyterian faith - men of strong, rugged, determined character, and women of virtue, diligence and culture. The first of the name of whom record is left was James Stranahan, who was born in the north of Ireland, in 1699. The orthography of the name has undergone many changes, having been in the following forms: Stranahan, Strachan and Strahan The name, however,, is derived from the parish of Strachan, Kincardineshire, Scotland. James Stranahan, the grandfather of him whose name forms the caption of this review, crossed the Atlantic to the new world in 1725, locating in Scituate, Rhode island, where he became a prosperous farmer. He afterward removed to Plainfleld, Connecticut, where he died in 1792, at the advanced age of ninety-three years. His namesake and eldest son served as a Revolutionary soldier in the war which brought independence to the nation, and lived and died in. Plainfleld, Connecticut. James S. T. Stranahan lost his father when eight years of age, and his happy boyhood days were soon transformed into a period of labor, for his stepfather needed his assistance in the development of the farm and the care of the stock. However, when the work of the farm was ended for the season, he entered the district schools, and there acquired his early education, which was later supplemented by several terms of study in an academy. From the age of seventeen he depended entirely upon his own resources. After completing his academical work he engaged in teaching school, with the intention of later fitting himself for the profusion of civil engineer; but the occupation of trading with the Indians in the northwest seemed to offer greater inducements, and in 1829 be visited the upper lake region. He made several trips into the wilderness, and these, together with the advice of General Lewis Cass, then governor of the territory of Michigan, led him to abandon that plan, and he returned to his home. The elemental strength of his character was first clearly demonstrated by his work in building the town of Florence, New York From his boyhood he had known Gerrit Smith, the eminent capitalist and philanthropist, who in 1832 made him a proposition according to the terms of which he was to go to Oneida county, New York, where Mr. Smith owned large tracts of land, and found a manufacturing town. He was then a young man of only twenty-four years, but the work was successfully accomplished, and the village of Florence, New York, was transformed into a thriving little city of between two and three thousand. His active identification with things political began during the period of his residence in Florence, for in 1838 he was elected to the state legislature on the Whig ticket, in a Democratic district. A broader field of labor soon engaged the attention and energies of Mr. Stranahan, who in 1840 removed to Newark, New Jersey, and became an active factor in railroad-building. In 1844 he came to Brooklyn, and from that time until his death he was a most potent factor in the commercial life, the political interests and the general upbuilding of the city. He found it a municipality with but fifty thousand inhabitants. He went to the city a comparative stranger. For some decades prior to his death he was known as "the first citizen of Brooklyn." Therein is found an expression of the high regard in which be was uniformly held. It is also an indication of the part which he played in its public affairs, the title being a free-will offering of a grateful people, who recognized his merit, his ability, and the wonderful work which he had accomplished for Brooklyn. The public, however, is a discriminating factor, and not at once did Mr. Stranahan gain his exalted position in public opinion. His first official service was as alderman, to which position he was elected in 1848, and in 1850 he was nominated for mayor, but his party was in the minority and he was defeated. His personal attributes at that time were not so well known as they were in later years, and thus he could not overcome the party strength of his opponent. However, his nomination served the purpose of bringing him before the public, and in 1854, when the country was intensely excited over the slavery question, he became a candidate for congress, and, although be was a strong anti-slavery man and the district was Democratic, be was triumphantly elected. In 1857, when the Metropolitan Police Commission was organized, he was appointed a commissioner, and he was one of the most active members of the board during the struggle between the new forces and the old New York municipal police force of New York, Brooklyn and Staten Island, who revolted under the new leadership of Fernando Wood, then mayor. Mr. Stranahan had joined the ranks of the new Republican party on its organization, and in 1864 he was a presidential elector on the Lincoln and Johnson ticket. In 1860, and again in 1864, he had been sent as a delegate to the Republican national convention, and at both times supported the Illinois statesman, Lincoln, for the presidency. During the Civil war he was president of the War Fund Committee, an organization formed of over one hundred leading men of Brooklyn, whose patriotic sentiment gave rise to the Brooklyn Union, a paper which was in full accord with the governmental policy, and upheld the hands of the president in every possible way. Its purpose was to encourage enlistments and to further the efforts of the government in prosecuting the war. Mr. Stranahan had an unshaken confidence in the ultimate triumph of the Union cause, and his splendid executive ability and unfaltering determination were of incalculable benefit in promoting the efficiency of the committee. His labors, too, were the potent element in carrying forward a work in which this commission was associated with the Woman's Relief Association, of which Mrs. Stranahan was president. This work was the establishment of a great sanitary fair, which has become historical and which was the means of raising four hundred thousand dollars to carry on the work of the sanitary commission in connection with the war. Mr. Stranahan never sought public office for himself except in the few instances mentioned, and then his nomination came as a tribute to his ability. In 1888, however, he was an elector for Benjamin Harrison, and being the oldest member of the electoral college, was honored by being appointed the messenger to carry the electoral vote from the State of New York to Washington. It is almost impossible to give in a brief biographical sketch an accurate record of the great work which Mr. Stranahan did in connection with the unbuilding of Brooklyn. His name is a familiar one in the city on account of his labors in behalf of the park system. Under the legislative act of 1860 he became president of the Brooklyn Park Commission, and he remained in office for twenty-two years, a period in which the growth of the city made demands for a park system that under his guidance was developed and carried forward to splendid completion. Prospect Park is an everlasting monument to him. He was also the originator of the splendid system of boulevards, the Ocean Parkway and the Eastern Parkway, which has provided in Brooklyn a connection of the city with the sea in a system of drives unsurpassed by any in the world. The concourse on Coney Island also resulted from his instrumentality. The element which made Mr. Stranahan's work different from that of all others, was that he could foresee possibilities. It was this which led to the development of Coney Island, for to him it seemed that the natural boundary of Brooklyn on the southwest was the Atlantic ocean, and he took steps to secure the rare advantage of an attractive highway from the city to the sea. It seems that every work with which he was connected proved of the greatest value to the city. The enterprises which he managed were gigantic in volume and far-reaching in effect For more than forty years he was a director of the Union Ferry Company, and under his guidance were developed the great Atlantic docks. Brooklyn had no warehouse on its water front and the region which is now the Atlantic docks was shallow water at the edge of the bay when he came to the city. He foresaw the possibilities for commerce by establishing docks at this point, and he labored with a courage and patience that ha; scarcely been equaled in the history of material improvement in the world. It was twenty-six years from the time he advanced his plans for the dock system before the Atlantic Dock Company made a dividend to its stockholders, and yet to-day its shipping returns arc greater than those of almost any other port of the world. Only to the civil engineer is the scope of the wonderful undertaking familiar. One who has not studied the science can not conceive of the amplitude of this work. Mr. Stranahan was also connected with the Brooklyn Bridge Company from its organization, and was one of the first subscribers to its stock; he was a member of the board of directors of the New York Bridge Company, and he served continuously as trustee from the time the work came under the control of the two cities until June 8, 1885. At the meeting of the trustees on that date, he occupied the chair as president of the board, and at that time his term expired. He also served continuously as a member of the executive committee, and upon nearly all of the important committees appointed during construction. He foresaw the immense volume of traffic that would be conducted over this mammoth span, and insisted that the original plans should be altered to insure to the giant structure strength sufficient to enable it to carry a train of Pullman cars Mr. Stranahan consulted with Commodore Vanderbilt, who agreed with him in the opinion that the time would arrive when solid Pullman trains would run in and out of Brooklyn from and to far western points. The following speech, delivered by Mr. Stranahan, May 8, 1883, at the annual banquet of the Chamber of Commerce of the City of New York, in response to the following toast. "The Great Bridge the Engineering Triumph of the Nineteenth Century: its Originators and Directors, for Their Patience, Fidelity and Zeal, Deserve Everlasting Gratitude: its Constructors Achieve Immortal Fame and its Complete Success," is reproduced for three reasons, - because it is historic, because it is a literary gem, illustrative of Mr. Stranahan's convincing style of oratory, and because it contains his views in regard to the union of the two cities: MR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN: I cannot, in responding to the toast which you have just read, do less, and will not attempt more, than to make a brief reference to the East River bridge. That bridge, so long the object of public thought, and not infrequently the target of newspaper criticism, now substantially finished and destined, in a short time to be opened for general use, needs no eulogy from my ups. There it stands, its own orator; and there for generations it will stand, its own historian. It will for ages be one of the attractions and one of the wonders of this great metropolitan center. Its fame will be world-wide; and the foreign traveler who seeks these shores will feast his eyes and gratify his curiosity in gazing upon a structure that now has no parallel in any of the products of human art. The past history of the bridge is so lost in the reality of the present, that the briefest reference thereto will suffice for the occasion. I hardly need say that the construction of this work has, at all times, been under the supervision of men of acknowledged integrity; and that, for the past eight years, the mayors and comptrollers of the two cities have been members of the board of trustees. I know of no public work that has been conducted with greater economy or a stricter regard for the general good. Though the trustees have often been sharply criticised by the loose talker and the newspaper scribbler, they have steadily and persistently pursued their work, confident that time and the result would be their best indication. High honor should be awarded to the chief engineers, the elder and the younger Roebling, the former of whom lost his life, and the latter his health, in a work second to no other of its kind in any age The skill and pains-taking labor of the assistant engineers, having the immediate charge of the work, have attracted the attention and won the admiration of every intelligent visitor to the bridge. The original estimate was that the bridge would cost $7,000,000, and the land on which it rests has cost $3,800,000, making an aggregate cost of $10,800,000. The actual cost, including the land taken, is about $15,000,000. This estimate, however, did not contemplate such a structure as the one that now exists. The height of the bridge was increased in obedience to the order of the general government, and its width and strength by the direction of the trustees. The bridge, as actually constructed, will support the freight and passenger trains of the trunk railways of the country. It has two carriage roads, instead of one, as at first intended. The original plan was that the approaches to the bridge should be simple iron trestlework, for which the trustees thought it expedient to substitute massive arches of brick and granite. The cables and suspended structure are composed of steel, instead of iron. In a word, the bridge, as it now is, if it has cost more than the original estimate, is not the bridge that was contemplated in that estimate. It is higher, wider and composed of stronger material. It furnishes an elevated highway between the two cities that is wider than Broadway. These changes, in the way of improvement, abundantly explain the increase of cost. They were needed to make the bridge what it should be. I feel confident that, on the opening of the bridge, the opinion of the general public will confer with that eta distinguished member of the chamber, who, after a walk with me over the structure, exclaimed, as we came near the New York side: "Well, I had no idea of the magnitude of this work. it is, indeed, grand in its conception, and, if possible. grander still in the courage of its execution." The bridge told its own story to that gentleman; and that story it wilt repeat in the ears of millions. To stand upon it, and see it, and see all that it reveals to the eye, is to admire. All sense of danger and all ideas of weakness at once disappear. The marvel is that human power, even when availing itself of natural laws, could produce such a result. I do not know, Mr. Chairman, whether you have heard it or not; yet I may as well say that the people of Brooklyn have an idea in regard to this bridge which is quite sure to reveal itself at no distant period. Brooklyn, as you are aware, is by the East river isolated from the main land. The people of that city hope that the bridge will remove that isolation, and put them in direct railway communication, not only with New York city, but with all parts of the country. This will greatly serve their convenience and promote their prosperity. New York will certainly not object, and will not be the loser. If a bridge over the Harlem river connects New York with the main land, why should not a bridge over the East river perform a similar service in behalf of Brooklyn and Long Island? Brooklyn believes in utilizing the bridge to this end; and fortunately the end can be gained without any serious disturbance of existing conditions in the city of New York. The Second Avenue railway has, between the Harlem river and twenty-third street, sufficient width for four tracks, and, between this street and the New York terminus of the bridge, for three tracks; and it is withal so strongly built as to make it entirely possible to utilize it to the full extent of giving to Brooklyn and the system of railroads on Long Island an outlet through the Hudson river and New Haven roads to all parts of the country. This view contemplates no public or private concessions on the part of the city of New York. It rests simply upon that business theory which so strongly marks the great trunk lines of the country, and to which the Hudson river and New Haven roads are no strangers. Though Brooklyn does not expect to rival the commercial grandeur of the greater city, she does expect in this way to be put in rapid and easy connection with the outside world, and, by her extended water front, by her capabilities of indefinite territorial expansion, and by her numerous attractions as a place of residence, to maintain, at the least, her past record in the growth of population and wealth. Mr. Chairman, Brooklyn has another idea, and has long had it, the accomplishment of which she hopes will be facilitated by this bridge The Thames flows through the heart of London, and the Seine through the heart of Paris; but in neither case have you two cities, It is London on both sides of the Thames, and Paris on both sides of the Seine. The corporate unity is not dissevered by either river. Numerous bridges make the connection between the two sides in both cities; and it is best for both that it should be so. The population on neither side would be advantaged by being split up into two municipalities. Here, however, we have our New York city and our Brooklyn, with the East river rolling between them. They are distant cities, in immediate contiguity with each other, and separated by a water highway. Is this distinctness of municipality any advantage to either? I think not. Would the consolidation of these two cities into one municipal corporation be any harm to either? I think not. The people are the same people, have the same manners and customs, and have common commercial and social interests; and one municipal government would serve them quite as well as two, and at far less cost. I know of no reason why this distinctness should be continued other than the fact that it exists; and I confess I see no good reason why it should exist at all. I may be mistaken, but I think that the public sentiment of Brooklyn would cordially welcome a consolidation of the two cities under the tale of New York. The East River bridge, now superadded to the ferry system, will, as Brooklyn hopes, so facilitate their mutual intercourse that both, without any special courtship on tither side, will alike ask the legislature of the State to enact the ceremony of a municipal marriage; and if this shall be done, then I venture to predict that each will be so happy and so well content with the other that neither will ever seek a divorce. I have thus, Mr. Chairman, briefly responded to the toast upon which I have been asked to speak; and, as I close, I cannot forbear to express the solid satisfaction which the trustees, who have for years given an unpaid service to the construction of the East River bridge, Dow feel, not only in view of its completion, but also of the character of the result attained. They will pass away; generations will come and go; but the monument wilt live. Centuries will roll away; and the bridge, though it may grow old in years, and in the far distant future be studied and used as the product of a by-gone age, will gill retain its strength. The cables will not snap, and the towers will not fall. The anchorages will be true to their trust. The massive arches will rot collapse. The steel and granite will not rot. Fire will not burn the bridge. Freight trains and Pullman cars will not break it. The winds will not shake it. Time and toil will not fatigue it.. Its youth and age will be alike periods of vigor. That bridge, Mr. Chairman, was built to stand; and stand it will - so long that we may well call it immortal. Mr. Stranahan's work in another regard largely brought about the union of Brooklyn and New York Long before the consummation of the project, he was one of the strongest advocates; in fact, he was the first than to put forth the idea. He viewed the question from the standpoint of a statesman, and worked upon the subject with the ability and skill of a diplomat. He realized that the completion of the Brooklyn bridge was a step toward the ultimate success of this condition. He realized that the cost of maintaining one central city government would be much less than two, and the work in all the departments might be far more effective, and lie lived to see the consummation of his hopes. Mr. Stranahan was twice married. In early manhood he wedded Marianne Fitch, who was born in Westmoreland, Oneida county. New York. and was a daughter of Ebenezer R. Fitch. For three years, from 1837 until 1840, they resided in Florence, New York, and during their four years' residence in Newark, New Jersey, their two children were born. Mrs. Stranahan died in Manchester, Vermont, in August, 1866, after twenty-two years' residence in Brooklyn. Mr. Stranahan afterward married Miss Clara C. Harrison, a native of Massachusetts. Before her marriage she was one of the leaders in educational circles in Brooklyn, and for a number of years was principal of a private seminary for the higher education of young ladies, which had an enrollment of two hundred pupils, and fourteen teachers and professors in its various departments She is a graduate of Mrs. Emma Willard's far-famed seminary, of Troy, New York She took a very active part in the great sanitary fair as a member of the committee on art, and of the committee on the postoffice and "Drum Beat," the latter a paper issued daily during the continuance of the fair, and of which Dr. Storrs was editor. From the postoffice many hundred letters of greatly varied character were distributed. A volume of autograph letters, chiefly from statesmen conspicuous at that time, were collected and bound through her agency, and brought several hundred dollars into the treasury. Mrs. Stranahan has ever been an active promoter of educational interests. She is a "founder" and the Brooklyn trustee of Barnard College. She is also vice-president of the alumnae association of her alma mater. She is an ardent advocate of the higher education of women, and in that direction is always ready to respond to the call for any aid which her influence, her presence or her pen can give. She has become widely known throughout the country as one of the most prominent members of the Daughters of the American Revolution. Tracing her ancestry from those who fought for the liberty of the colonies, she became a member of the organization and was elected one of its vice-presidents-general, the highest tributes they have paid to her ability as a presiding officer and as a parliamentarian; but her prominence in these lines is not less pronounced than her fame in the field of literature She has written much upon many articles of interest to the public at the time when her pen gave to the press the written documents, and her opinions have carried weight and influence. These, however, having sen-cd their purpose, have passed from the public mind, yet she has a masterpiece of literature in her volume, called "A History of French Painting." The fly-leaf of the work is inscribed as follows: To My Husband J. S. T. STRANAHAN This work is affectionately inscribed in recognition of thy rare qualities of his service to others through his ready perception of the ties of kinship, citizenship, humanity. The work received the highest praise in artistic and literary circles in this country and in Europe. The following extract from a review of the work by the able editor of the Eagle, Mr. McKelway, is here produced: MRS. STRANAHAN'S PEN. Of the things which she might have done and still have had her book pass current as a history, Mrs. Stranahan did neither. She might have contented herself with the dates and names and general allusions, or she might have made a pleasant little trip along the path of French art development, picking up a few flowers here and there, tying them into chapters and calling them a history. There are few cases in all literature in which the application of the word history is not to a great extent a sort of beneficent libel, but that of Mrs. Stranahan's production is a most notable exception. It needs the eye of no artist, either amateur or professional, to see at a glance what she had to do. There is not a page of the book that does not tell its own eloquent story of toil, which would have shaken the purposes of any but the most resolute of women. The work would have been arduous enough if all the materials which she has utilized had been, by some impossible literary legerdemain, placed at her disposal with due reference to chronology and sequence. What she would still have had to do, even under those conditions, would have been exacting enough to justify the highest praise, for the manner in which she has done it. Those who know how busy a woman she is, in other than a literary sense, are at a loss to comprehend how she found time to search out what she wanted, to wander among the shadows of the centuries that are gone, and to give them a substance as tangible as if they belonged to yesterday. Tributes to her energy and determination might be made as strong as words can make them, but they are entitled to no precedence over other acknowledgments, upon which her claim is just as dear: the intuitive perceptions of a woman have been reinforced by a grasp and virility usually incident to a masculine intelligence. As a matter of fact, many have fallen into the error of supposing that the name on the title page, C. H. Stranahan, belonged to one of the sterner sex. There is not the least sign of uncertainty about the touch anywhere between the covers of the book. It is affirmative, vigorous and decisive, without a suggestion of dogmatism. If the material that is to be lifted into place is right, it is handled with a delicacy that is not effeminate; if it is ponderous, there is always in reserve for it a surprising degree of strength. In tier sense of relative importance of things, the author is exceedingly fortunate. Lilliputians are not exaggerated into Goliaths, and giants are not dwarfed into pigmies. It is impossible not to admire the discrimination which has been shown throughout. Evidently Mrs. Stranahan's first care was to see that her own powers of assimilation were in excellent working order. While it is palpable that her appetite for relevant facts was perfectly omnivorous, it is equally manifest that nothing was hastily devoured. It is one thing to set a trap for. the artistic honor of by-gone times in France; it is another thing to catch it. Then comes the exercise of the supreme faculty of portrayal, and it is here that Mrs. Stranahan gives a momentum to her work which sends it with a sweep into the front rank. There is much in what she herself says about the true art that is suggestive of her purpose and of the manna in which she fulfills them. She was again before the public as a member of the Woman's Board, appointed by the New York state commissioners to carry on the work of the World's Columbian Exposition, and at once was assured an active part in organizing the Woman's Board of Managers for the Empire state, and was chosen vice-president of the board, her brilliant intellect, broad knowledge of affairs and rare executive ability well qualifying her for that exalted position. She took a firm stand in opposition to the opening of the fair on Sundays, and was the only member of the board who voted in favor of closing the exposition on the Sabbath She was as resolute in her objections as she was enthusiastic and helpful in her support of many lines of work which contributed to that triumph of American art, genius and intellect. Since her marriage she has given her influence in support of the charities of the city, and for a quarter of a century was president of the Kings County Visiting committee of the State Charities Aid Association, and for twenty-seven years was corresponding secretary of the Society for the Aid of Friendless Women and Children. The labors of Mrs. Stranahan rounded out and supplemented those of her honored husband, and no line of marked advancement in the city but felt the beneficence of their aid. Private business investments and enterprises claimed the attention of Mr. Stranahan, and his operations along such lines were mammoth, yet he always found time and opportunity to devote to the public good. He realized as few men seem to do the great needs of humanity in the department of material, mental and moral advancement, and his labors were so far-reaching and of such varied nature that in almost every connection Brooklyn can truthfully acknowledge her debt of gratitude to him. His position in the city is indicated by the fact that through private subscriptions by his fellow citizens, a statue was erected to his honor in Prospect Park. The Rev. Richard Salter Storrs, D. D., led the movement in an address before a meeting of the Hamilton Club, called for that purpose, in which he gave a characterization remarkable in history. The site was certainly appropriately chosen - in this park made possible by the effort of Mr. Stranahan. This is well expressed by quoting as the inscription upon the monument, what is said of Sir Christopher Wren: "If you ask for a monument of what he has done, look around you." The idea of erecting the monument was heartily endorsed, and no one was permitted to subscribe more than a hundred dollars, but the necessary amount was soon collected, and the commission for the work given to Frederick MacMonnies. the famous Brooklyn celebrity now residing in Paris. He not only had marked ability, but also the very necessary civic pride which spurred his genius to its highest effort, and has produced a statue which, when it was seen in public, was voted by critics, among them being St. Gaudens, and - the press generally, to be one of the best examples of artistic sculpture in America. For many years prior to his death there was no living man in Brooklyn who had such a deep hold upon the hearts of the people, and when before was ever the statue of a private citizen erected in his home city during his own lifetime? He passed away in Saratoga. September 3, 1898, and his funeral cortege was the first that ever took its way to the cemetery through Prospect Park. On this occasion the workmen of long-time service stood in lines of honored respect. His remains were laid to rest in Greenwood, but the very wide circle of his influence is felt and will be felt throughout all time. A contemporary biographer has said of him: "To citizens throughout Brooklyn and the state who were acquainted with his character, he stood for all that is desirable in a finely developed manhood. If his word could be secured, it was as good as any bond that was ever solemnize by signature or seal; if his friendship could be won - and true worth could always win it - it was as loyal as truth is to itself, and if social order or social advancement needed a support that never bent or weakened, it could find it in him." Through all his busy career he was the soul of honor, believing honesty and integrity the best capital that a man could possess. His one particular delight was on each Sunday-school anniversary to drive up before the reviewing stand in Prospect Park and watch the inspiring spectacle of thousands of little ones, attired in bright garments. with their banners waving in air under sunny skies, marching down the long meadow which was the creation of his genius. Shakespeare's words would be a fitting epitaph for him: "He was a man. Take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again?"