OHIO STATEWIDE FILES - Know your Ohio: Ohio in the Civil War Pt 4 *********************************************************************** OHGENWEB NOTICE: All distribution rights to this electronic data are reserved by the submitter. Reproduction or re-presentation of copyrighted material will require the permission of the copyright owner. The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb Archives to store the file permanently for free access. *********************************************************************** File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by Darlene E. Kelley http://www.genrecords.net/emailregistry/vols/00026.html#0006374 October 14, 1999 *********************************************************************** Historical Collections of Ohio Diaries of S. J. Kelly Plains Dealer Know Your Ohio by Darlene E. Kelley *********************************************************************** Ohio in the Civil War -- part 4. Railroads-- and etc As the war progressed and the lethality of rifled muskets became all too evident, soldiers' attitudes changed toward using cover in combat. Navel events at Hampton Roads, Va., which included a duel beteen ironclad vessels Monitor and Merrimack, convincingly illustrated the efficiency of iron plating in stopping projectiles. Shortly thereafter, " Moniter" fever swept the nation as ironclad enthusiasts lobbied for the construction of a huge ironclad fleet. Army officers also caught this fever, and ironclad railroad cars soon appeared across the nation. Ohio was one of the first to use this method. Fittingly, troops called them railroad "Monitors". in honor of the Federal Vessel that inspired the fever. The first railroad monitors resembled iron boxcars. Light artillery pieces were fired from hatches cut in the hull. Small-arms apertures cut in the sides allowed infantrymen to suppliment the fire of the main guns. The car's armor was only thick enough to withstand small-arms fire. however, so commanders generally relegated the boxcar-shaped monitors to areas known to be infested with partisans. Railroad monitors carried several infantrymen. However, firing artillery and muskets from within the cramped confines of a railroad car must have been confusing and dangerous. Ultimately. montors carried riflemen with repeating rifles inside the car, which had an artillery piece mounted on the top of the car that commanded all sides of the train. This arrangement separated the infantry from the artillery while substantially increasing fire-power, but a least one unimpressed reporter from Ohio referred to it as a " hermaphrodite." Another means of segregating the infantry from the artillery was the rifle car. Rifle cars resembled ordinary boxcars, but their shielding was placed inside of the cars. Musket apertures on all sides offered their crews wide fields of fire for small arms. Like the artillery-bearing railroad monitors, rifle cars could guard key railroad features. protect repairmen, supervise railroad guards and escort supply trains. Just as rife monitors foreshadowed modern tanks, rifle cars were early versions of infantry fighting vehicles. Along with rifle cars came a new type of railroad monitor that used thick, sloped iron casemates that could deflect light artillery projectiles-- an important capability when Confederate horse artillery lurked nearby. These new railroad monitors resembled elongated pyramids and were the same shape a casemated ironclad vessels ( turrets were not used with the light artillery on railroad monitors, though armored railroad cars in subsequent conflicts did use turrets). With their thick armor and cannons, these railrad cars were similar to modern tanks. Rifle cars and monitors coupled to a locomotive formed an ironclad ( or armored) train. A simple ironclad train consisted of a locomotive and a railroad monitor. Optimally, however, an ironclad train employed a number of cars in a specific sequence as had armed trains. A railroad monitor rode at each end of the train. Coupled to these were rifle cars, with the locomotive and tender positioned in the middle. This march order distributed firepower evenly, provided mutually supporting small-arms and artillery fire, and afforded the locomotive some protection. Not all ironclad trains had the same number of cars, but this efficacious march order became the ideal for armored trains subsequently used by many nations. Indeed, modern armored forces today use a simular combined-arms approach of mutually supporting firepower, although the vehicles operate independantly rather being coupled together in units, and, of course, are not limited to the rails. While armor might protect rolling stock from projectiles, explosive devices planted in the railroad posed serious threats to trains of all types. Those torpedoes ( known today as mines ) included simple artillery shells with percusson fuses as well as specially constructed pressure-detonated contrivances filled with gunpowder.When buried in the roadbed under a crosstie, torpedoes could be detonated by a passing train. Some torpedoes, especially those using arillery shells, lifted locomotives completely from the tracks and shattered freight cars. Because of the many hazards that might be present on the tracks, some Federal locomotives pushed loaded flatcars over the rails to inspect the tracks or to detonate torpedoes before the valuable locomotive passed over them. These flatcars, known today as control cars, pusher cars, or monitor cars ( not to be confused with railroad monitors), also protected locomotives from rams. Another method of preventing attacks on Federal trains was to put hostages wit Confederate sympathies on th trains. Some Federal commanders even issued draconian decrees threatening to deport local inhabitants or destroy their farms if depredations occurred on local railroads. Beligerents also used other vehicles on the railroads. Handcars-- small but utilitarian vehicles--were used to inspect rails, transport important personnel and evacuate the wounded. They also helped troops escape superior forces and reconnoiter in fluid tactical situations. In this role they were far more stealthy than locomotives, although they lacked a locomotive's speed and protective cab. Some handcars were large enough to transport several men, including guards, and were valuable mode of transport if a locomotive was unavailable. In one instance, a large handcar carried a 10-pounder Parrott gun to duel with a much larger Confederate railroad battery. Since operable locomotives were at a premium during the war, it was not always economical to use them on missions for which a smaller vehicle would suffice. The Federals therefore applied off-the-shelf technology to warfare, using recently developed steam passenger cars ( self-propelled railroad coaches) to inspect the tracks and deliver pay to isolated posts. On such missions, the cars carried some interior armor that protected the steam engine as well as the crew, making the steam passenger cars forerunners of self-propelled armored railroad cars or, as the Russians called them, rail cruisers. These heavily armed railroad cars proved good substitutes for armored trains, since several cars were not dependant on a single locomotive for mobility. Civil War railroad operations were characterized by the widespread use of locomotives and rolling stock to support armies tactifully as well as logistically. Americans set precedents for a variety of modern armored fighting vehicles, including armored railroad cars, armored trains, railroad batteries and other railroad weapons. Moreover, tanks, armored personnel carriers, engineer vehicles and self-propelled artillery can also claim American railroad weapons as their conceptual ancestors and Ohio certainly did their part in its concept. *********************************************** To be continued in part 5.