Marion-Multnomah County OR Archives News.....Supreme Court March 28, 1893
************************************************
Copyright.  All rights reserved.
http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm
http://www.usgwarchives.net/or/orfiles.htm
************************************************

File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by:
Sheron Faynor nitwittwin@hotmail.com August 21, 2008, 5:24 pm

The Daily Independent March 28, 1893
Elizabeth Lovejoy;respondent, vs. W.S.Chapman, appellant, appeal from 
Multnomah county; Judgement of the lower court affirmed. Opinion by Moore,J.

Portland and Fairway Railway Co., appellants, vs. Thomas Spillman, respondent, 
appeal from Multnomah county; judgement of the lower court affirmed. Opnion by 
Bean,J.

Geo.W.Hahn, respndent, vs. Guardian Assurance Company, appellant, appeal from 
Multnomah county; judgement reversed and the cause remanded to the couty below 
for such further proceedings as are not inconsistent with this opinion. 
Opinion by Lord, C.J.

Joseph Hughes, respondent, vs. Edward Holman, appellant. The motion to recall 
the mandat in this cause and for the modification of the judgement as to the 
allowance of costs to the respondent is allowed upon the authority of the 
judgement as of this couty in the case of Wood vs. Fitzgerald. 3 OR 568.
While the court feels bound ot respect the decision in that case as the law of 
th epresent case, its correctness is doubted, and when a question is properly 
presented and brought here upon appeal it will be re examined.

L.W. Nelson, appellant, vs. S.W. Blaisdell et al., espondents. The motion for 
modification of the decree herein in the court below is overruled and denied. 
Held, that the modification suggested would probably affect parties to the 
decree no tbrought before the court on appeal, and cannot therefore be made.

The Portland construction company, appellant, vs. J.O' Neil et al., 
respondent, and J.S. McElvain, appellant, vs. O.D. Wolf, et al., 
respondent,appeal from Multnomah county. Argued and submitted.

Milton W.Smith, attorney for appellant, Thomas N.Strong, R.Stott and J.J. 
Johnson, attorneys for the respondent.


File at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/or/marion/newspapers/supremec104nw.txt

This file has been created by a form at http://www.poppet.org/orfiles/

File size: 2.3 Kb