Area history: Watson's Annals, The Treaty Tree, 1857: Vol I Contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by EVC. USGENWEB NOTICE: Printing this file by non-commercial individuals and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices and submitter information is included. Any other use, including copying files to other sites requires permission from the submitters PRIOR to uploading to any other sites. We encourage links to the state and county table of contents. ____________________________________________________________ WATSON'S ANNALS of PHILADELPHIA and PENNSYLVANIA Vol. 1 Written 1830 - 1850 Chpater 9 THE TREATY TREE and FAIRMAN'S MANSION "But thou, broad Elm ! Canst thou tell us nought Of forest Chieftains, and their vanish'd tribes ? -----------------------Hast thou no record left Of perish'd generations, o'er whose heads Thy foliage droop'd ?---thou who shadowed once The rever'd Founders of our honour'd State." The site of this venerable tree is filled with local impressions. The tree itself, of great magnitude and great age, was of most impressive grandeur. Other cities of our Union have had their consecrated trees; and history abounds with those which spread in arborescent glory, and claimed their renown both from the pencil and the historic muse. Such have been "the royal oak", Shakespeare's "mulberry tree", &c. "From his touch-wood trunk the mulberry tree Supplied such relics as devotion holds Still sacred, and preserves with pious care." In their state of lofty and silent grandeur they impress a soothing influence on the soul, and lead out the meditative mind to enlargement of conception and thought. On such a spot, Penn, with appropriate acumen, selected his treaty grounds. There long stood the stately witness of the solemn covenant --- a lasting emblem of the unbroken faith, "pledged without an oath, and never broken!" Nothing could surpass the amenity of the whole scene as it once stood, before "improvement", that effacive name of every thing rural or picturesque, destroyed its former charms, cut down its sloping verdant bank, razed the tasteful Fairman mansion, and turned all into the levelled uniformity of a city street. Once remote from city bustle, and blest in its own silent shades amid many lofty trees, it looked out upon the distant city, "saw the stir of the great Babel, nor felt the crowd"; long, therefore, it was the favourite walk of the citizen. There he sought his seat and rest. Beneath the wide spread branches of the impending Elm gathered in summer whole congregations to hymn their anthems and to hearken to the preacher, beseeching them, "in Christ's stead, to be reconciled unto God". Those days are gone, "but sweet's their memory still!" Not to further dilate on the picture which the imagination fondly draws of scenes no longer there, we shall proceed to state such facts as the former history of the place affords, to wit: The fact of the treaty being held under the Elm, depends more upon the general tenor of tradition, than upon any direct facts now in our possession. When all men knew it to be so, they felt little occasion to lay up evidences for posterity. Lest any should hereafter doubt it, the following corroborative facts are furnished to wit: The late aged Judge Peters said he had no doubt of its being the place of the treaty. He and David H. Conyngham (lately alive), had been familiar with the place from their youth as their swimming place, and both had always heard and always believed it designated the treaty ground. Judge Peters remarked too, that Benjamin Lay, the hermit, who came to this country in 1731, used to visit it and speak of it as the place of the treaty; of course he had his opinion from those who preceded him. Mr. Thomas Hopkins, who died lately at the age of 93, had lived there upwards of fifty years, and told me he never heard the subject questioned in his time. James Reed, Esq., a nephew of James Logan's wife, who died in 1793, at the age of 71, (a great observer of passing events) used to say of West's paintings of the treaty, that the English characters severally present were all intended to be resemblances, and were so far true, that he (Mr. Reed) could name them all. He fully believed the treaty was held at the Elm; and Mrs. Logan has heard him express his regret (in which others will join him) that Benjamin West should have neglected truth so far as to have omitted the river scenery. Proud says, "the proprietary being now returned from Maryland to Coaquannock, the place so called by the Indians, where Philadelphia now stands, began to purchase lands of the natives. It was at this time (says he) when William Penn first entered personally into that lasting friendship with the Indians, [meaning the treaty, it is presumed] which ever after continued between them". Clarkson, who had access to all the Penn papers in England, and who had possession of the blue sash of silk with which Penn was girt at the aforesaid famous treaty, gives the following facts, strongly coincident with the fact of the locality of the treaty tree, --- saying, "It appears, [meaning, I presume, it was in evidence, as he was too remote to be led to the inference by our traditions] that though the parties were to assemble at Coaquannock, the treaty was made a little higher up, at Shackamaxon". We can readily assign a good reason for the change of place; the latter had a kind of village near there of Friends, and it had been besides the residence of Indians, and probably had some remains of their families still there. Benjamin West, who lived here sufficiently early to have heard the direct traditions in favour of the treaty, has left us his deep sense of that historical fact, by giving it the best efforts of his pencil, and therein drawn the portrait of his grandfather as one of the group of Friends attendant on Penn in that early national act. His picture, indeed, has given no appearance of that tree, but this is of no weight; as painters, like poets, are indulged to make their own drapery and effect. Nothing can be said against the absence of the tree, which may not be equally urged against the character and position of the range of houses in his back ground, which were certainly never exactly found at Shackamaxon, Coaquannock, or Upland. But we may rest assured that Mr. West, although he did not use the image of the treaty tree as any part of his picture, [possibly because he could have no picture of it in England, where he painted] he nevertheless regarded it as the true locality; because he has left a fact from his own pen to countenance it. This he did in relating what he learnt from Colonel Simcoe respecting his protection of that tree during the time of the stay of the British army at and near Philadelphia. It shows so much generous and good feeling from all the parties concerned, that Mr. West's words may be worthy of preservation in this connection, to wit: "This tree, which was held in the highest veneration by the original inhabitants of my native country, by the first settlers, and by their descendants, and to which I well remember, about the year 1755, when a boy, often resorting with my school fellows, was in some danger during the American war, when the British possessed the country, from parties sent out in search of wood for firing; but the late General Simcoe, who had the command of the district where it grew, (from a regard for the character of William Penn, and the interest he took in the history connected with the tree), ordered a guard of British soldiers to protect it from the axe. This circumstance the General related to me, in answer to my inquiries, after his return from England." If we consider the lively interest thus manifested by Mr. West in the tree, connected with the facts that he could have known from his grandfather, who was present and must have left a correct tradition in the family, (thus inducing him to become the painter of the subject), we cannot but be convinced how amply he corroborates the locality above stated. We have been thus particular because the archives at Harrisburg, which have been searched, in illustration and confirmation of the said treaty, have hitherto been to little effect; one paper found barely mentions that, "after the treaty was held, William Penn and the Friends went into the house of Lacy Cock. [There is a deed from Governor Henoyon of New York, of the year 1664, granting onto Peter Cock his tract, then called Shackamaxon.] And Mr. Gordon, the author of the late History of Pennsylvania, informed me that he could only find at Harrisburg the original envelope relating to the treaty papers; on which was endorsed "Papers relative to the Indian treaty under the great Elm". In regard to the form and manner of the treaty as held, we think William Penn has given us ideas, in addition to West's painting, which we think must one day provide material for a new painting of this interesting national subject. Penn's letters of 1683, to the Free Society of Traders, and to the Earl of Sunderland, both describe an Indian treaty to this effect, to wit: To the Society he says, "I have had occasion to be in council with them upon treaties for land, and to adjust the terms of trade. Their order is thus -- the king sits in the middle of an half moon and hath his council, the old and wise on each hand. Behind them or at a little distance sit the younger fry in the same figure. Having consulted and resolved their business, the king ordered one of them to speak to me; he stood up, came to me, and in the name of his king saluted me; then took me by the hand and told me `he was ordered by his king to speak to me, and that what he should say was the king's mind,' &c. While he spoke not a man of them was observed to whisper or smile. When the purchase was made great promises passed between us of kindness and good neighbourhood, and that we must live in love so long as the sun gave light. This done, another made a speech to the Indians in the name of all the Sachamachers or kings, --- first, to tell what was done; next, to charge and command them to love the Christians, and particularly to live in peace with me and my people. At every sentence they shouted, and, in their way, said Amen." To the Earl of Sunderland, Penn says: "In selling me their land they ordered themselves -- the old in a half moon upon the ground; the middle aged in a like figure at a little distance behind them; and the young fry in the same manner behind them. None speak but the aged, -- they having consulted the rest before hand." We have thus, it may be perceived, a graphic picture of Penn's treaty, as painted by himself; and, to my mind, the sloping green bank presented a ready amphitheatre for the display of the successive semicircles of Indians. Fishbourne's MS. Narrative of 1739, says Penn established a friendly correspondence by way of treaty with the Indians, at least twice a year. The only mark of distinction used by Penn at the treaty was that of a blue silk net-work sash girt around his waist. This sash is still in existence in England; it was once in possession of Thomas Clarkson, Esq., who bestowed it to his friend as a valuable relic. John Cook, Esq., our townsman, was told this by Clarkson himself in the year 1801, --- such a relic should be owned by the Penn Society. The tree thus memorable was blown over on the 3d of March, 1810; the blow was not deemed generally prevalent, nor strong. In its case, the root was wrenched and the trunk broken off; it fell on Saturday night, and on Sunday many hundreds of people visited it. In its form it was remarkably wide spread, but not lofty; its main branch inclining towards the river measured 150 feet in length; its girth around the trunk was 24 feet, and its age, as it was counted by the inspection of its circles of annual growth, was 283 years. The tree, such as it was in 1800, was very accurately drawn on the spot by Thomas Birch, and the large engraving, executed from it by Seymour, gives the true appearance of every visible limb, &c. While it stood, the Methodists and Baptists often held their summer meetings under its shade. When it had fallen, several took their measures to secure some of the wood as relics. An arm-chair was made from it and presented to Doctor Rush; a part of it is constructed into something memorable and enduring at Penn's Park, in England. I have some remains of it myself. But the fallen tree finely revived, in a sucker from it, was flourishing in the amplitude of an actual tree on the premises of the Pennsylvania Hospital, in the centre of the western vacant lot, since turned into Linden Street, where it stood a while in the paved street and was cut down in 1841. Messrs. Coates and Brown, managers, placed it there some 25 or 26 years ago. I had myself seen another sucker growing on the original spot, a dozen years ago, amid the lumber of the ship yard. It was then about 15 feet high, and might have been still larger but for neglect and abuse. I was aiding to have it boxed in for protection; but, whether from previous barking of the trunk, or from injuring the roots by settling the box it did not long survive the intended kindness. Had it lived, it would have been an appropriate shade to the marble monument, since erected near the site of the original tree to perpetuate its memory, with the following four inscriptions on its four sides, to wit: Treaty ground of William Penn William Penn and the Born 1644 Indian Nations, Died 1718 1682 Unbroken faith. ------------------------------------------------ Placed by the Pennsylvania Penn Society Founded A.D. 1827 1681 to mark the by Deeds of site of the Peace. Great Elm Tree. ------------------------------------------------- As it is possible, with nourishing earth and due watering, to raise small cuttings from another Elm, I recommend that a successor may yet be placed over the monument. We come now next in order to speak of the FAIRMAN MANSION --- This respectable and venerable looking brick edifice was constructed in 1702, for the use of Thomas Fairman, the deputy of Thomas Holme, the Surveyor General, and was taken down in April 1825, chiefly because it encroached on the range of the present street. A brick was found in the wall, on which was marked, "Thomas Fairman, September, 1702". It had been the abode of many respectable inmates, and was once desired as the county seat of William Penn himself, --- a place highly appropriate for him who made his treaty there. Governor Evans, after leaving his office as Governor, dwelt there some time. It was afterwards the residence of Governor Palmer; and these two names were sufficient to give it the character of the "Governor's House", --- a name which it long retained after the cause had been forgotten. After them the aged and respectable Mr. Thomas Hopkins occupied it for fifty years. Penn's conception of this beautiful place is well expressed in his letter of 1708, to James Logan, saying, "If John Evans (the late Governor) leaves your place, then try to secure his plantation; for I think, from above Shackamaxon to the town is one of the pleasantest situations upon the river for a Governor; where one sees and hears what one will and when one will, and yet have a good deal of the sweetness and quiet of the country. And I do assure thee, if the country would settle upon me six hundred pounds per annum, I would hasten over the following summer.* Cultivate this amongst the best Friends". The next year, (1709) his mind being intent on the same thing, he says: "Pray get Daniel Pegg's, or such a remote place, (then on Front near to Green Street) in good order for me and family". [* We may here see how absolutely determined, and pledged too, Penn once was to return and settle his family forever among us, by his request in next year to engage Pegg's house. I presume, Evans' house could not then be had, and that he was actually encouraged to come over at the £ 600 a year; but after circumstances in England prevented his return here.] A letter of Robert Fairman, brother of Thomas, the surveyor, dated London, 10th of 2d mo. 1711, to Jonathan Dickinson, which I have seen in MS. claims to be the proper owner of the estate at Shackamaxon, and saying, "I have been lately in company with William Penn; and there speaking to him of thy proposing to buy for a friend that plantation at Coxon Creek, (i.e. the Cohocksinc) he says it is a pleasant place for situation, out of the noise of Philadelphia, but in sight of it, --- a place he would choose for his dwelling if he should return there, --- says he asks £ 600 for it". In another letter of the 30th of 8 mo. 1711, he marks its location in front by saying, "The river Delaware joining to said land makes it more valuable than back land, and besides, it is so near the town". He states also, that his brother writes him that thirteen aces of the said land next the creek (Coxon) may ere long be worth £ 1000. He expressly speaks of the place as situated in "Shackamaxon". In another letter dated the 12th of 3 mo. 1715, which I have preserved, on page 252 of my Annals in the Historical Society, as a singularity for its peculiar hand-writing in text character, he speaks therein of his place near Coxen Creek as having woods and stumps; says the trees have been cut there to form a new bridge on the new road across the creek; speaks of Thomas Fairman's death, and that the widow then on the premises complains of hard usage from Captain Palmer, --- the same, it is probable, who afterwards came to be President of the Council, and for a short time, in 1747, Governor, ex-officio. "Governor Anthony Palmer," so called in his latter years, was a wealthy gentleman who came from the West Indies about the year 1709, and lived in a style suited to his circumstances, keeping a coach, then a great luxury, and a pleasure barge, by which he readily made his visits from Shackamaxon to the city. He was said to have 21 children by his first wife, all of whom died of consumptions; some of his descendants by a second wife are now residents of Philadelphia. The present aged colonel A. J. Morris told me that he heard old Mr. Tatnal say, that Governor Palmer offered him a great extent of Kensington lots on the River Street at six pence a foot ground-rent forever, --- a small sum for our present conceptions of its value, changing as the whole scene now is to a city form, filling with houses, cutting down eminences, and filling up some lower places to the general level, --- a change, on the whole, not unlike what must have been the superficial change originally effected at Philadelphia. Old Edward Duffield, the executor of Dr. Franklin's will, who used to own land in Kensington and had been curious to enquire the meaning of Shackamaxon, told his son that he learnt that it meant the "field of blood", in reference to a great Indian battle once sustained there. I must remark, however, that the Delaware missionary, Mr. Luckenbach, informed me that if it is a Delaware word, allowing for a little variation in spelling, it meant "a child not able to feed itself". In general he deemed our Indian names of Shawnese origin. --- Another and most probable sense, is "the place of Eels". --- "Vide" Heckewelder. As every thing relative to this hallowed place, by reason of the Treaty Tree, once there, is to be deemed interesting, we have concluded since the first edition, to add the following additional items, to wit: The Shackamaxon locality has long been a mooted point, and we had before entertained the belief that it began as "Pleasant Point", in Kensington, (a place already effaced and changed as a "point", but once sufficiently plain as a gravelly strand on the north side of the mouth of Cohocksinc,) and therefore, to be in effect considered as beginning at Cohocksinc Creek, and extending along the River to Gunner's Creek. I have lately found a fact in the Minutes of the Friends' Meetings at Abington, which goes to prove that the Friends' Meetings were originally held at Shackamaxon at the house of Thomas Fairman, (miscalled Fairlamb, in Proud and others) to wit: "on the 11 of 2 mo. 1682, it was mutually agreed that a meeting be at William Cooper's at Pyne Point, (N.J.) the 2d first day of 3 mo. next, and the next meeting be at Thomas Fairman's at Shackamaxon, and so in course", and "at a monthly Meeting the 8th of 9 mo.1682 --- at this time Governor William Penn and a multitude of Friends arrived here and erected a City called Philadelphia, "about half a mile from Shackamaxon", where Meetings, &c., were established, &c. Thomas Fairman, at the request of the Governor, removed himself and family to Tackony, where there was also a Meeting appointed to be kept, and the ancient Meeting of Shackamaxon removed to Philadelphia, from which meeting also other meetings were appointed in the Province of Pennsylvania". From the premises it is to be inferred, as very natural to have made the Treaty at the Treaty Tree, when it was also the ample house, and the head quarters, of the Friends and their meetings. On page 130 of my MS. Annals, it will be seen respecting "Fairman's Mansion", that by a letter of Robert Fairman of London, of 1711, he speaks of the house "at the Treaty Tree", built of brick in 1702, (and taken down in 1825) as the locality of the said Thomas Fairman's former house --- he having been dead some time, and his widow being then (in 1711) on the premises. Robert Venables, the aged black who died in Philadelphia in 1834, aged 98, told me that he had always heard that it was at the Treaty Tree that William Penn held his treaty. He had never heard a doubt of it in his long life in Philadelphia. He heard it often so said by the aged and by his own parents, who were blacks from Barbadoes. He said it was the current report that the "three balls" on Penn's arms represented three apple dumplings*, and were intended to commemorate the fact of Penn being treated at the treaty. [This, though erroneous, tests the popular confirmation of the treaty there in early times.] He said also as the popular story of the aged in his youth (and he had seen several persons who had seen Penn !) that the treaty was made "under the great Elm" on the 1st day of May", and that for that cause, they kept May days with great rejoicings as King Tamanee's day. *[These are so called also by the people, on the Penn arms, on the old milestones on the Gulf and Haverford roads.] In the year 1836, there was published some notices of the gift I had made to the Town House in Kensington, acknowledging the welcome reception of two elm trees which I had planted in the front court yard of that house, as mementos of the Treaty Elm: --- they being of the same species and transplanted from the premises once Richard Townsends, where he had erected the first mill in Philadelpia County, now the same place called Roberts' Mill, near to Germantown. It had also the additional interest of being the same place once owned by Godfrey, the inventor of the quadrant, and where his body, now taken to Laurel Hill Cemetery, was for many years interred. It may be mentioned also, that a similar Elm, from near his grave, was also taken and planted and now flourishes before my own house, in the Main Street in Germantown. The Commissioners of Kensington, too, with commendable good feelings, have constructed for their Town Hall, a great arm chair of relic wood formed of the real Treaty Tree, and sundry other woods designated in a secret drawer attached, so as to perpetuate the facts intended to be consecrated to posterity by the enduring presence of the elegant chair. All this showed most commendable feelings for the honoured founders of the State, and was in just keeping with their own local relation to the historical incidents of the country. Long may it be preserved as a memento of the past, and long may the trees, so planted, endure to link one generation with another, --- to stand like living monuments speaking forth their solemn and soothing lessons, as from fathers to sons and the sons of sons. Having made a communication to the Historical Society in December, 1835, since printed, concerning "the Indian Treaty for the Lands near the site of Philadelphia and the adjacent country", I hereby repeat some of the remarks then made, to the effect that there has been a misconception of the nature and object of the admitted assemblage of Penn and the Indians under the Great Tree. It was emphatically true that under that ample Elm, "Was sheltered once The rev'd Founders of our honour'd State, Met, with forest chieftains and their vanish'd tribes." But, it was not a Treaty for lands to be then purchased, but was a great meeting of verbal conference and pledge, popularly called "the Treaty", in which presents were bestowed, mutual civilities exchanged, and reciprocal promises of friendship and good will were severally made. Made in the name and form (as will be shown) of a league and chain of friendship". To this fact, the testimony of tradition has also been unceasing and unchanging. It has been told and believed from the beginning, or from a time, as the civilians say, "in which the memory of man runneth not to the contrary". If this, my assumption or position, be true, it will then sufficiently account for the hitherto strange fact, that in so important a matter as the deed and title to "the lands" which we now, as Philadelpians, and even as Pennsylvanians, occupy, we have NO original Treaty ___ formed at the Treaty Tree, to show ! We have hitherto been looking for an alleged instrument of writing, which had no existence at that time, because it was not then necessary, nor then executed, But the fact is, as the records which I inspected at Harrisburg lately, will show, that the actual treaty for the lands of the present Philadelphia and adjacent country, out to Susquehanna, was made in the year 1685, by Thomas Holme as President of the Council, in the absence of William Penn, who was then returned back to England. The Treaty, so made, on the 30th dy of the 5th mo.1685, was formed with Shakkoppoh, Secane, Malibore, and Tangoras, Indian Sakamakers, and right owners of the lands lying between Macapanackan, alias Upland, now called Chester River or Creek, and the River or Creek of Pemapecka, now called Dublin Creek, beginning at a hill called Conshohockin (at present by Matson's ford) on the River Manaiunk or Skoolkill, &c., &c. .....then to go north-westerly back into the woods --- to make up two full days' journey, AS FAR AS A MAN CAN GO IN TWO DAYS, from the said station of the parallel line at Pemapecka, [thus going or extending in effect back to the Susquehanna River, and no further, at that time, and in THAT treaty]. FOR, AND IN CONSIDERATION, [we feel almost ashamed to name it !] of 200 fathoms of wampum, 30 fathoms of duffels, 30 guns, 60 fathoms of strawed waters, 30 kettles, 30 shirts, 20 gunbelts, 12 pair of shoes, 30 pair of stockings, 30 pair of scissors, 30 combs, 30 axes, 30 knives, 20 tobacco tongs, 30 bars of lead, 30 pounds of powder, 30 awls, 30 glasses, 30 tobacco boxes, 3 papers of beads, 44 pounds of red lead, 30 pair of hawks' bells, 6 drawing knives, 6 caps, 12 hoes: Do by these presents grant, bargain and sell, &c., all right, title and interest, THAT WE OR ANY OTHERS SHALL OR MAY CLAIM IN THE SAME, --- hereby renouncing and disclaiming for ever any claim or pretence to the premises, for us, our heirs, and successors, and all other Indians whatsoever. The whole is signed by queer marks and witnessed by seven Indians and eight white men --- citizens. It may possibly be urged that the Treaty made on 23d of 4mo, 1683, when William Penn was still here, between William Penn and Kings Tamanen and Metamequan, for their lands, from "near Neshemanah Creek, and thence to Pemapecka" may have been treated for under the Treaty Tree. This certainly appears to have been the earliest land treaty on record; but as Phladelphia was then already located as a city, it could not have been necessary for that object. There is still another view of this subject to be considered --- which is, that Capt. Sven, then resident near Swedes' Church, south end of the City, was then proprietor of part, if not all of Philadelphia land, under a grant of gift from his own sovereign Queen Christiana --- and it is already matter of history that he yielded his land to Penn, in consideration of other lands bestowed upon him up the Schuylkill. A Treaty made at Conastogae the 26th of May 1728, stated in the Minutes of Council at the time, between Governor Gordon and Captain Civility and other Chiefs, makes direct reference to the first Treaty in nine items, concluding that amity and friendship was to exist between them for ever, or --- "as long as the Creeks and Rivers run, and while the sun, moon, and stars endure", "and lastly, that both Christians and Indians should acquaint their children with this league and firm chain of friendship now made, while Creeks and Rivers run, &c. From the proceeding I have arrived, as I conceive -- by consulting in connexion Proud's History --- at the confirmation of the fact, that the aforesaid nine articles were a part of "the league and chain of friendship", first made by William Penn himself at the time of his arrival, when made under the Treaty Tree in 1682, to wit: --- Proud's History, vol. 1, p.212 says, "it was at this time (1682) when he first entered personally into that lasting friendship (not land purchase) with the Indians, which ever afterwards continued between them; and for the space of more than seventy years, (say till the time of Braddock and the French War) was never interrupted". "A firm peace (not a treaty for land) was, therefore, now reciprocally concluded between William Penn and the Indians; and both parties mutually promised to live together as brethern, (as one of the articles said, as members of "one body") this was solemnly ratified by the usual token of a chain of friendship and covenant never to be broken so long as the sun and moon endure." In the same vol. 1, p. 215, in stating the case of the Indian Treaty at Albany in 1722, Governor Keith, then present, is made to say to the Indians, "that he desired that the visit and the Covenant chain, which is hereby brightened, may be recorded in everlasting remembrance, and to last as long as the mountains and rivers, and while the sun and moon (former words) endure", and this he especially said, as "the repetition of the former treaties which they made with William Penn". I conclude, therefore, that although the original of "the League and chain of friendship", made at "the conference at the Treaty Tree in 1682, is not now to be found, (unless at Stoke Pogis --- the Penn residence in England,) we have the "nine articles" aforesaid, being all of "the main heads" of that memorable and venerable Treaty Tree instrument. I have endeavoured to repress the expression of the feelings I cannot but feel in the contemplation of the premises, that such lands as we now possess should have been bestowed for such very inconsiderable reward ! I feel it as a stain upon our escutcheon of honour, that while "They, to greet the pale faced stranger Stretch'd an unsuspecting hand," we should have been so unmindful of our own duties, as to overlook the recompense due --- "Entrapp'd by Treaties, driven forth to range The distant west in misery and revenge ! " The only abatement I know, is to say that Penn in fact deemed the land his own by grant from the Crown even before he came among them; as his letter to the Indians from London sets forth, on the 15 of 8 mo.1681, saying, even to themselves openly, that his king hath given him a great Province, (i.e. their lands!) which he, however, "desires to enjoy with their love and consent". "Then redmen took the law of love As from a brother's hand And they blessed him while he founded The city of our love." Chapter 10. THE SWEDES' CHURCH and HOUSE OF SVEN SENER The Swedes of the hamlet at Wiccao, at the present Swedes' Church in Southwark, having been the primitive occupants, near the present site of Philadelphia, (before the location of our city was determined), will make it interesting to glean such facts as we can concerning that place and people. There they once saw the region of our present city scenes --- "One still And solemn desert in primeval garb ! " Mr. Kalm, the Swedish traveller, when here in 1748, saw Nils Gustafson, and old Swede, then 91 years of age, who told him he well remembered to have seen a great forest on the spot where Philadelphia now stands; that he himself had brought a great deal of timber to Philadelphia at the time it was built. Mr. Kalm also met with an old Indian, who had often killed stags on the spot where Philadelphia now stands ! It appears from manuscripts and records that the southern part of our city, including present Swedes' Church, Navy Yard, &c., was originally possessed by the Swedish family of Sven, the chief of which was Sven Schute, --- a title equivalent to the Commandant; in which capacity he once held Nieu Amstel under charge from Risingh. As the Shute of Korsholm fort, standing in the domain of Passaiung, he probably had its site some where in the sub-district of Wiccao, --- an Indian name, traditionally said to imply "pleasant place" --- a name highly indicative of what Swedes' Church place originally was . We take for granted that the village and church would, as a matter of course, get as near the block-house fort as circumstances would admit. The lands of the Sven family we however know from actual title, which I have seen to this effect, to wit: "I, Francis Lovelace, Esq., one of the gentlemen of his Majesty's Honourable Privy Council, and Governor General under his Royal Highness, James, Duke of York and Albany, to all to whom these presents may come, &c. Whereas, there was a Patent or Ground brief granted by the Dutch Governor at Delaware to Swen Gonderson, Swen Swenson, Oele Swenson, and Andrew Swenson, for a certain piece of ground lying up above in the river, beginning at Moyamensing kill, and so stretching upwards in breadth 400 rods, [about 1 1/4 mile wide] and in length into the woods 600 rods, [nearly 2 miles] in all about 800 acres, dated 5th of May, 1664, KNOW YE, &c., that I have ratified the same, they paying an annual quit rent of eight bushels of winter wheat to his Majesty." This patent was found recorded at Upland, the 31st of August, 1741. The Moyamensing kill above mentioned was probably the same creek now called Hay creek, above Gloucester Point, and the 600 rods, or 2 miles of length, probably extended along the river. We know that Penn deemed their lines so far within the bounds of his plan of Philadelphia and Southwark, that he actually extinguished their title by giving them lands on the Schuylkill, above Lemon hill, &c. The Rev'd. Dr. Collin has ascertained from the Swedish MS. records in his possession, that the first Swedes' Church at Wiccao was built on the present site in 1677, five years before Penn's colony came. It was of logs, and had loop-holes in lieu of window lights, which might serve for fire-arms in case of need. The congregation also was accustomed to bring fire-arms to prevent surprise, but ostensibly to use for any wild game which might present in their way in coming from various places. In 1700, the present brick church was erected, and it was then deemed a great edifice, and so generally spoken of; for certainly nothing was then equal to it, as a public building, in the city. An elderly gentleman informs me that he had cause to know that the Swedes' Church was built mostly by subscription. Some paid in money and some in work and materials --- the then parson carried the hod himself. The bell is said to have some silver in it, and to give a disagreeable sound. The same gentleman informed me that he had seen a view of the first church engraved on a curiously shaped silver box, which had come from an old Swede. It had become at last a lip-salve box. The parsonage house, now standing, was built in 1737. The former parsonage house was in the Neck. There were originally 27 acres of land attached to the Wiccao Church. These facts were told me by Dr. Collins. At my request he made several extacts from the Swedish Church-books to illustrate those early times; which he has since bestowed to the historical department of the Philosophical Society. The original log-house of the sons of Sven was standing till the time the British occupied Philadelphia; when it was taken down and converted into fuel. It stood on a knoll or hill on the N.W. corner of Swanson Street and Beck's Alley. Professor Kalm visited it in 1748 as a curiosity, and his description of it then is striking, to wit: "The wretched old wooden building, (on a hill a little north of the Swedes' Church) belonging to one of the sons of Sven, (Sven's Saener) is still preserved as a memorial of the once poor state of that place. Its antiquity gives it a kind of superiority over all the other buildings in the town, although in itself it is the worst of all. But with these advantages it is ready to fall down, and in a few years to come it will be as difficult to find the place where it stood, as it was unlikely, when built, that it should in a short time become the place of one of the greatest towns in America. Such as it was, it showed how they dwelt, when stags, elk, deer and beavers ranged in broad daylight in the future streets and public places of Philadelphia. In that house was heard the sound of the spinning wheel before the city was ever thought of ! " He describes the site as having on the river side, in front of it, a great number of very large sized water-beech or buttonwood trees; one of them, as a solitary way-mark to the spot, is still remaining there. He mentions also some great ones as standing on the river shore by the Swedes' Church --- the whole then a rural scene. It was deemed so attractive, as a "pleasant place", that Thomas Penn when in Philadelphia made it his favourite ramble; so much so, that Secretary Peters, in writing to him in 1743, thus complains of its changes --- saying, "Southwark is getting greatly disfigured by erecting irregular and mean houses; thereby so marring its beauty that, when he shall return, he will lose his usual pretty walk to Wiccaco". I ascertained the following facts concerning "the old Swedes' house", as they called the log-house of the sons of Sven. Its exact location was where the blacksmith's shop now stands, about 30 feet north of Beck's Alley, and fronting upon Swanson Street. It had a large garden and various fruit trees behind it. The little hill on which it stood has been cut down as much as five or six feet, to make the lot conform to the present street. It descended to Paul Beck, Esqr., through the Parhams, an English family. The wife of the late Rev. Dr. Rogers remembered going to school in the Sven House with her sister. They described it to me, as well as a Mrs. Stewart also, as having been one and a half story high, with a piazza all around it, having four rooms on a floor, and a very large fire-place with seats in each jamb. Beck's Alley and the "improvements" there had much spoiled the former beauty of the scene along that alley. There had been near there, an inlet of water from the Delaware, in which boats could float, especially at high tides. There were many very high trees, a ship yard, and much green grass all about the place. Now not a vestige of the former scene remains. Although my informants had often heard it called "the Swedes' house" in their youth, they never understood the cause of the distinction until I explained it. The Sven family, although once sole lords of the southern domain, have now dwindled away, and I know of no male member of that name, or rather of their anglified name of Swanson. The name was successively altered. At the earliest time it was occasionally written Suan, which sometimes gave occasion to the sound of Swan, and in their patent, confirmed by Governor Lovelace, they are named Swen. By Professor Kalm, himself a Swede, and most competant to give the true name, they are called Sven's-Saener, i.e., sons of Sven. Hence in time they were called sons of Suan or Swan, and afterwards, for euphony sake, Swanson. I found in the burial place of the Swedes' church a solitary memorial; such as the tablet and the chisel have preserved in these rude lines, to wit: "In memory of Peter Swanson, who died December 18, 1737, aged 61 years Reader, stop and self behold ! Thou'rt made of ye same mould, And shortly must dissolved be: Make sure of blest Eternity !" In the same ground is the inscription of Swan Johnson, who died in 1733, aged 48 years, who probably derived his baptismal name from the Sven race. The extinction of these names of the primitive lords of the soil, reminds one of the equally lost names of the primitive lords at the other end of the city, to wit: the Hartsfelders and Peggs --- all sunk in the abyss of time ! "By whom begotten or by whom forgot", equally is all their lot ! One street has preserved their Swanson name; and the City Directory did once show the names of one or two persons in lowly circumstances; if, indeed their names was any proof of their connexion with Sven Schute. The late Anthony Cuthbert, of Penn Street, when aged 77, told me he remembered an aged Mr. Swanson in his youth, who was a large landholder of property near this Sven house; that he gave all his deeds or leases, "with the privilege of using his wharf or landing near the buttonwoods." The single great tree still standing there as a pointer to the spot, is nearly as thick at its base as the Treaty Elm, and like it diverges into two great branches near the ground. Long may it remain the last relic of the home of Sven Sener ! They who see the region of Swedes' Church now, can have little conception of the hills and undulations primarily there. The first story of the Swedes' Church, now on Swanson Street made of stone, was originally so much under ground. The site there was on a small hill now cut down eight feet. At the east end of Christian Street, where it is crossed by Swanson Street, the river Delaware used to flow in, so that Swanson Street in that place, say from the north side of Swedes" Church lot up to near Queen street, was originally a raised causeway. Therefore, the oldest houses now standing on the western side of that street do not conform to the line of the street, but range in a line nearly south west, and also stand back from the present street on what was (before the street was laid out) the margin of the high ground bordering on the River Delaware. Those houses too have their yards one story higher than their front pavements, and what was once their cellars under ground is now the first story of the same buildings. From the Swedes' Church down to the Navy yard, the high hill formerly there has been cut down five or six feet, and by filling up the wharves below the former steep banks, the bank itself, as once remembered, even 30 years ago, seems strangely diminished. At some distance from Swedes' Church, westward, is a remarkably low ground, between hills, having a pebbly bed like the river shore, which shows it once had a communication with the Delaware River at the foot of Christian Street; where Mr. Joseph Marsh, an aged gentleman, told me he had himself filled up his lot on the south-west corner as much as three feet. On that same lot he tells me there was formerly, before his time, a grain mill worked by two horses, which did considerable grinding. The same Mr. Marsh, then aged 86, showed me that all the ground northward of Christian Street, and in the rear of his own house, No. 13, descended suddenly; thus showing there must have been there a vale or water channel leading out to the river. His own house formerly went up four steps at his door, and now the ground in the street is so raised as to remove them all. Near him, at NO. 7, on the north side of Christian street, is a very ancient-looking boarded house of but one very low story, having its roof projecting beyond the wall of the house in front and rear, so as to form pent-houses. It is a log-house, in truth, concealed by boards and painted, and certainly the only Log House in Philadelphia ! What is curious respecting it, is that it was actually framed and floated to its present spot by "old Joseph Wharton" from Chester county. Of this fact Mr. Marsh assured me, and told me it was an old building in his early days, and was always then called "Noah's ark". He remembered it when the cellar part of it (which is of stone and seven feet deep) was all above ground, and the cellar floor was even with the former street ! I observed a hearth and chimney still in the cellar, and water was also in it. This water the tenants told me they supposed came in even now from the river, although at 100 feet distance. I think it not improbable that it stands on spring ground, which, as long as the street was lower than the cellar, found its way off, but now it is dammed. The floor of the once second story is now one foot lower than the street. On the whole, there are signs of great changes in that neighbourhood, --- of depressing hills or of filling vales; which, if my conjectures be just, would have made the Swedes' Church, in times of water invasions from high tides, a kind of peninsula, and itself and parsonage on the extreme point of projection. The primitive Swedes generally located all their residences "near the freshes of the river', always choosing places of a ready water communication, --- preferring thus their conveyances in canoes to the labour of opening roads and inland improvements. From this cause their churches, like this at Wiccao, were visited from considerable distances along the river, and making there, when assembled on Lord's day, quite a squadron of boats along the river side. A granddaughter of Sven Schute --- then bearing the name of Swanson, married to John Parham of London --- lived to be 103 years of age, and died in 1795. She has told the present John Parham of West Chestnut Street, her grandson, that she well remembered having been at the Swedes' Church while it was still a block house --- having loop-holes for firing therefrom. She had seen William Penn on his second visit; she described him as a thick-set agreeable looking man, of middle stature, wearing a wig. She had at one time heard through an Indian woman, coming out a doctress with herbs from up Timber Creek, that the Indians in Jersey meditated an attack. The women at Sven Schute's house were then making soft soap, which they forthwith took scalding-hot to the block house, with more fuel to keep it hot there --- they then sounded their conchs to call in the people --- as soon as the women were gathered thereby, the Indians came and began to undermine the building, when they were successfully repelled by the scalding soap and delayed until the men began to approach from a distance, and the Indians made off. After this, some of the inhabitants fearing a repetition of the assault moved off to Bucks County. There are some facts existing, which seem to indicate that the first Swedish settlement was destroyed by fire. Mrs. Preston, the grandmother of Samuel Preston, an aged gentleman lately alive, often told him of their being driven from thence, by being burnt out, and then going off by invitation to an Indian settlement in Buck's County. In Campanius work, he speaks of Korsholm fort, (supposed to be the same place) as being abandoned after Governor Printz returned to Sweden, and afterwards burned by the Indians; very probably as a measure policy, to diminish the strength of their new masters, the Dutch; or perhaps to show their retained affection to the Swedes, and their aversion to the Dutch. So they did when they burned the place which the Dutch had constructed at Gloucester Point. There seems at least some coincidence in the two stories. The road through Wiccaco to Gloucester Point was petitioned for, and granted by the Council in the year 1720, and called --- the road through the marsh. The ground of the Swedes' church contains the monument and remains of Wilson the ornithologist, who desired such a then retired place, where birds, amid its trees, might carol over his grave. For many years, the venerable church --- while it stood far from the town, was essentially a Country Church, and in that relation it brings up to the fancy the poetic description of Mrs. Seba Smith --- to wit : ---- They all are passing from the land Those Churches old and gray, In which our fathers used to stand In years gone by, to pray --- There meekly knelt, those stern old men, Who worshipped at our Altars then. It was a church low built and square, With belfry perched on high, And no unseemly carvings there To shock the pious eye--- That belfry was a modest thing, In which a bell was wont to swing. It stood, like many a country church, Upon a spacious green; Whence stile and by-path go in search Of cot, the hills between, The rudest boor that turf would spare, And turn aside his team with care. I smile with no sarcastic smile As I each group review, That came by many a long, long mile, In garments fresh and new; The Sunday dress --- the Sunday air, The thorough-greased and Sunday hair. The straight, stiff walk, with Sunday suit, The squeaking leather shoe, The solemn air of man and brute, As each the Sabbath knew; The conscious air as passed the maid, The swains collected in the shade. The females enter straight the door, And talk with those within --- The elders on town matters pore, Nor deem it deadly sin, And now the pastor grave and slow, Along the aisle is seen to go. Down drop the children from the seat, The groups disperse around --- Pew doors are slamm'd and gathering feet Give out a busy sound --- The sounding pipe and viol string No longer through the old church ring. I do remember with what awe That pulpit filled mine eye, As through the balusters I saw The sounding board on high, Those balusters ! --- a childish crime -- Alas ! I've squeaked in sermon time. Hard thinkers were they, those old men, And patient too I ween --- Long words and knotty questions then But made our fathers keen. I doubt me if their sons would hear Such lengthy sermons year by year. But all are passing fast away --- Those abstruse thinkers too --- Old churches with their walls of gray Must yield to something new --- Be-Gothic'd things, all neat and white, Greet everywhere the traveller's sights. Chapter 11. PENNY-POT HOUSE AND LANDING It was not long after I first saw the above title that I met with any certain means of establishing its location at Vine Street. Proud spoke of it as "near to Race Street", and none of the aged whom I interrogated knew any thing about it. Of course it would be still less known to any modern Philadelphian, although it had been bestowed as a gift to the city by Penn, and was made memorable as the birth-place of "the first born". Some of the following facts will fully certify its location at Vine Street. In the year 1701, William Penn sets forth and ordains "that the landing places now and heretofore used at the Penny Pot-House and Blue Anchor, shall be left open and common for the use of the city", &c. The landing appears to have derived its name from the Inn built there, which was early famed for its beer at a penny a pot. [The "Duke of York's law", still preserved in MS. on Long Island, shows that the price of beer was fixed in his colony at a penny a pint; and Penn, in 1683, speaks of abundance of malt beer in use then at the Inns.] The house itself was standing in my time as the Jolly Tar Inn, kept by one Tage. It was a two story brick house of good dimensions, having for its front a southern exposure. At first it had no intervening houses between it and the area of Vine Street; but when I last saw it, as many as three houses had filled up that space. The aged Joseph Norris of that neighbourhood, who died a few years ago in his ninetieth year, told me he remembered in his youth to have seen a sign affixed to the house, and having thereon the words, "Penny-Pot Free Landing". On the same area, and on the first water lot above it, was for many years the active ship-yards of Charles West, who came out with Penn, and began his career by building him a vessel, for which in part pay he received the lot on which the present William West, Esqr., his grandson, has his salt stores and wharf. The vessels once built on that site extended their bowsprits up to Penny-Pot House, and those built upon the area of Vine Street extended the jib-boom across Front Street to the eaves of West's House --- then a two story building on the north-west corner of Vine and Front Streets. Ship building was for many years a very active and profitable concern, --- building many ships and brigs for orders in England and Ireland, and producing in this neighborhood a busy scene in that line. The aged John Brown and some others told me there were originally rope-walks along the line of Cable Lane; from which circumstance it received its title; and much ship timber and many saw-pits were thereabout. Mrs. Steward, an old lady of 93, told me she remembered when the neighborhood of Cable Lane was all in whortleberry bushes; and, as late as 1754, it may be seen in the Gazette, that William Rakestraw then advertises himself as living "in the uppermost house in Water Street, near Vine Street", and there keeping his board yard. The occasional state of Penny-Pot may be learned from the several Presentments of the Grand Jury at successive periods, to wit: In the year 1706, they present the "Free Landing of Vine Street" as necessary to be secured with the banks of the same, whereby the Front Street may not become, as it threatens to be, unfit to be passed with carts. In 1713, they present as a nuisance the east end of Vine Street, where Front Street crosses it. In 1718, they present a gully running down Vine Street and crossing Front Street, for that the same is not passable by coaches, wagons or carts, to the endangering of lives. In 1719, they present several dangerous breaches, and among them that near the Penny-Pot House as almost impassable. In 1720, they again present a breach in the upper end of Front Street, near the Penny-Pot House, as unpassable for carts, and the cross-way of Vine Street and the Front street, by Sassafras Street, almost unpassable. In 1724, they present the bank at the end of Vine street, being worn away to the middle of Front Street, and very dangerous. We thus perceive that the breach was the tumbling down of the river side bank, which, by successive rains rushing down Vine street, had worn away the Fronot Street road half across that street. Finally, in 1740, they present again "the Penny-Pot Landing and the east end of Vine Street", as encumbered with timber and plank, &c., by Samuel Hastings and Charles West. In the original foundation of the city, it having been of easier access as a landing, it was chosen, as the best location for a cave, for the parents of John Key, from which cause he came to have his birth there as the first born of Philadelphia. The founder, in consideration of that distinction in his colony, presented a patent in his name for a large lot in Race Street --- the same which he sold at his majority, in 1715, to Clement Plumstead, for only £12. The lot adjoining Penny-Pot on the north was once distinguished by a row of threble stone houses of two stories, projecting quite into the present street. [The street there, as Water Street continued, was not recorded till about 48 years ago.] Its original appearance was striking from the river, and its own river prospect unrivalled. This then notable building, now down, received the name of "the College"; and, in 1770, the principal and owner, Mr. Griscom, advertised it as his beautiful private academy, far out of town, "free from the noise of the city, at the north end". It afterwards fell into decay and neglect, but still retained the name of "the College", but (as was said in my boyish days) because every chamber held separate families after the manner of a college, --- the original use of it having been forgotten, and many poor families thus filling it up. Chapter 12. POOLE'S BRIDGE This bridge, crossing Pegg's Run at Front Street, was named as well as the neighbourhood, after one Poole, a Friend, who had his ship yard and dwelling on the hill there, called "Poole's Hill" in early days. It as then an establishment quite separate from the city population, and even from Front Street itself; for neither Front Street nor Water street, which not long since united there, were then extended so far. "Poole's Hill" was therefore the name before the bridge was constructed there, and designated a high bluff, abruptly terminating the high table land of the city at its approach to Pegg's Run, and the overflowing marsh ground beyond it northward as high as Noble Lane and Duke Street. Poole's dwelling house was picturesque, and pleasantly situated on the west side of present Front Street, on a descending hill sloping westward, and giving a prospect up the Creek and into the adjacent country. A fine peach orchard lay along the line of the present Front Street as far south as Margaretta Street, and extended eastward, down the sloping green bank into the river. To this add his ship yard close to the margin of the creek, and the whole scene is grateful. The well of water, for which the place was famous, stood in the middle of the present Front Street. These acts were confirmed to me in general by Mr. Tallman, the butcher, and Mr. Norris the ship carpenter, near there, and by Mr. John Brown; all of whom, if now alive, would be severally about 100 years of age. They all concurred in saying that Front Street, when it reached near to present Margaretta Street, went off (down the hill) westward, so as to pass over Pegg's marsh meadow, 150 feet further westward than the present Front Street, which was itself a causeway of late years. It may serve in corroboration of some of the preceding facts to state, that by the Minutes of Friends, it appears that one Nathaniel Poole passed Meeting with Ann Till in the year 1714. In the year 1701, his name appeared on a jury list in my possession, and in 1708-9, William Poole appears as part owner of a vessel and sea-adventure. In the year 1754, a Mr. Carpenter advertises in the Gazette, that he has then "for sale, boards and staves on Poole's Hill, at the upper end of Front Street", This intimates, I presume, that before the building of Poole's Bridge, and making the causeway from it, northward, "the hill" ended the then town; and as the ship yard was probably then discontinued, the place was converted into a northern landing place for lumber, &c. In the year 1713, the Grand Jury recommended a tax of one penny per pound to be assessed, to pay for repair of road at Poole's Hill, and at the new bridge at Governor's Mill --- Cohocksinc. Mr. John Brown informed me that when Poole's Bridge was built, the Philadelphia masons would not undertake it, and Israel Roberts, from Maryland, was sent for to construct it. This was done about 85 years ago. The same year a northeast September gale beat it down. It was soon rebuilt again --- say in 1755. The time is probably more accurately fixed by Secretary Peters; he, writing to Penn in 1747, says, "A new bridge made on the present line of Front Street over Pegg's Run, whereby the street now makes a fine view by a north entry over the town". The former low wooden bridge was further west. The causeway from Front Street, which was formed in connection with the bridge in 1755, has been described to me by Mr. Thomas Bradford and J. Brown, to the following effect, to wit: The road was formed with sluices made under it, so that tidewater flowed into the pond then along the eastern end of Pegg's meadow. This pond was probably caused by the former parallel causeway further to the westward making a barrier to the water. On the eastern side of Front Street, opposite to present Noble Street, was a long barrier or wharf, up to which the river came, and in the time of the war, seventeen of the row gallies lay there quite up to the street. The late aged Timothy Matlack, Esq., told me there was a tradition of a sloop of war having once wintered at the creek at Poole's Bridge, and that when they were digging for a foundation for the bridge; they found articles which must have been dropped from such a vessel. There is in this relation, something like an attempt at the story of the sword dug up at Second Street Bridge, on this run. But, as "sloops of war" in old times meant any sized armed vessels, it would be easy enough to conceive that vessels would be found getting out of the ice at Poole's shipyard. Of the once greater depth of the creek there can be no doubt, as Colonel A. J. Morris told me that his grandparents had gone up it to Spring Garden Spring; in a boat, and made their tea there amid the trees and shrubbery. The earliest built houses, near Poole's Bridge on the causeway, were Anthony Wilkinson's row on the western side, and Doctor Clifton's row on the eastern side. They had in that day some attempt at display, having brick columns in relief; but they were deemed an abortive speculation in both. On the occasion of an extreme great freshet, the river water over-flowed all the mounds and embankments, deluging the whole area of Pegg's meadows, and giving occasion to the Tallman family, who dwelt near there, to get into a boat and sail about to and fro as high up as to Third Street. This fact was told to me by Mrs. Tallman when she was past seventy, --- and spoke of it as an event of fifty years before. Chapter 13. PENN'S COTTAGE IN LAETITIA COURT It is a matter of inquiry and doubt with some, at this day, to fix which has been the house in Laetitia Court, wherein William Penn, the founder, and Colonel Markham, the Lieutenant Governor, dwelt. The popular opinion now is, that the Inn at the head of the court, occupied as the Leopard Inn, and since Penn Hall, is the identical house alluded to. The cause of this modern confidence is ascribable (even if there were no better ground of assurance) to the fact, that this building, since they built the additional end to the westward, of about eighteen to twenty feet, presents such an imposing front towards High Street, and so entirely closes the court at that end, (formerly open as a cart passage) that from that cause alone, to those not well informed, it looks as the principal house, and may have, therefore, been regarded by transient passengers as Penn's House. The truth is, that for many years the great mass of the population had dropped or lost the tradition about Penn's House in the court; and it is only of later years, antiquities beginning to excite some attention, that the more intelligent citizens have revived some of their former hearings about the court. During all the earlier years of my life I never heard of Penn living there at all; but of later years I have. I have been, therefore, diligent to ask old men about it. Several said it never used to be spoken of in their youth. John Warder, an intelligent merchant, born at the corner house of the alley on High Street, told me, when he was about 73 years of age, that he never was told of Penn's living there, when a boy. On the other hand, a few old men have told me, that at every period of their life the tradition (though known to but few) was, that it was one of two houses, to wit --- either Doyle's Inn, or the Old Rising Sun Inn, on the western side of the alley. Joseph Sansom, Esq., when about 60, told me he heard and believed it was the house at the head of the court, and so also some few others; but more persons, of more weight in due knowledge of the subject, have told me they had been always satisfied it was the Old Rising Inn, on the western side of the court. Timothy Matlack, when aged 92, who was very inquisitive, and knew it from 14 years of age, said it was then the chief house in that court as to character; it was a very popular Inn for many years; (whereas Doyle's House was not an Inn till many years afterwards) that it then had an alley on its northern side for a cartway, running out to Second Street, and thus agreeing with "Penn's gate over against Friends' Meeting", at which place his Council, 1685, required King James' proclamation to be read. If what was lately Doyle's Inn, (Penn's Hall) had a south front, and a "dead wall" towards High Street, it seems very difficult to conceive how its great gate could be "vis-a-vis" Friends' Great Meeting, on the southeast corner of High and Second Streets. But the Laetitia House, i.e. Old Rising Sun, would correspond; besides, Penn, in his instructions to his commissioners, says, "Pitch my house the middle of the towne, and facing the harbour," &c. Timothy Matlack also told me that he used to be told that on the southern side of that Rising Sun Inn was Penn's stable, and that they used to say he could lay in his bed or on his settee, and hear his horses in the next building munching their food. Colonel Anthony Morris, when aged 84, told me expressly, he always understood the same house was Penn's residence; that it was so talked of when a boy, and that it is only of later years that he ever heard a hint of the house at the head of the court as being his residence. Thomas Bradford, when 80 years of age, who was born close by there, and has always dwelt there, has told me he always heard the Rising Sun Inn, western side, was "Laetitia's House", and that what was lately Doyle's Inn was never stated as Penn's till of modern times, and in its primitive state it presented a dead wall to High Street, and had its only front upon Black Horse Alley. The aged Robert Venables, who died in 1834, aged 98, told me that he knew the Laetitia House, on the west side of the court. It was the same which has been since "the Old Rising Sun Inn". "It had a shell over the door" in his time --- "was very curiously worked in stucco". The house at the head of the court was never named as Penn's House. That house had its front to Black Horse Alley --- old Johnson lived there and was a painter. This name "Laetitia House", I found, was a name which even those who thought the house at the head of the court was Penn's, granted that Laetitia Penn dwelt in, even while the father may have occupied the other. In this they were certainly in some error --- Laetitia, being an unmarried girl, could never have had a separate house; she was not with her father till his second visit, in 1700. It was in Penn's first visit only, in 1682, that he could have dwelt there. I infer from all the facts, that Penn had "his cottage" built there before his landing, by Colonel Markham; [Gabriel Thomas, who said "he went out in the first ship", said he then saw "the first cellar digging for the use of our Governor".] that some of the finer work was imported for it with the first vessels; that he used it as often as not at his "palace" at Pennsbury. After him, it was used by Colonel Markham, his Deputy Governor; and afterwards for public offices. That in 1700, when he used the "Slate House", corner of Second Street and Norris' Alley; having a mind to confer something upon his daughter then with him, he gave her a deed, 1 mo., 29th, 1701, for all that half square laying on High Street, and including said house. Several years after this event, the people, as was their custom, when the court began to be built up on each side of a "38 feet alley", having no name for it, they, in reference to the last conspicuous owner, called it Laetitia Court, in reference to the then most conspicuous house; the same house so given to Penn to his daughter. A letter, which I have, from William Penn, dated 1687, says, "Your improvements (in Philadelphia) now require some conveniency above what my cottage has afforded you in times past". He means this "for the offices of state". In 1684-5, his letter to James Harrison, which I have seen and copied, allows "his cousin, Markham, to live in his house in Philadelphia, and that Thomas Lloyd, the Deputy Governor, should have the use of his periwigs, and any wines and beer he may have there left, for the use of strangers". It may possibly be deemed over fanciful in me to express a wish to have this primitive house purchased by our Penn Association, and consecrated to future renown. I hope, indeed, the idea will yet generate in the breasts of some of my fellow members the real poetry of the subject. It is all intellectual; and has had its warrant (if required) in numerous precedents abroad. We may now see written upon Melancthon's house in Wirtenburg, "Here lived and died Melancthon !" In the same city are still preserved "Luther's Room", his chair, table, and stove; and at Eisleben is seen a small house, bought and preserved by the king of Prussia, inscribed, "This is the house in which Luther was born". [This house, so kept to the memory of Luther, has its rooms hung with pictures, ancient and grotesque, and the rooms contain chairs, tables and other relics of the former possessor. An Album is there, in which the visitor inscribes his name from Luther's inkstand. "Vide Dwight's travels."] Petrach's house is not suffered to be altered. Such things, in every country, every intelligent traveller seeks out with avidity. Why, therefore, should we not retain for public exhibition the primitive house of Penn? Yea, whose foundation constituted "the first cellar dug in Philadelphia !" To proper minds, the going into the alley and narrow court to find the hallowed spot (now so humble) should constitute its chiefest interest. It would be the actual contrast between the beginning and the progress of our city. Its exterior walls I would preserve with inviolate faithfulness; and within those walls (wherein space is ample, if partitions were removed) might be an appropriate and highly characteristic place of meeting for the ordinary business of the Penn Association and the Historical Society, and also for the exhibition of such paintings and relics as could now be obtained, --- such as Penn's clock, his escritoire, writing table, &c., besides several articles to be had of some families, of curiously constructed furniture of the primitive days. The hint is thus given --- will any now support the idea? If we would contemplate this Laetitia House in its first relations, we should consider it as having an open area to the river the whole width of the half square, with here and there retained an ornamental clump of forest trees and shrubbery on either side of an avenue leading out to the Front Street; having a garden of fruit trees on the Second Street side, and on Second Street "the Governor's gate", so called, "opposite to the lot of the Friends' Great Meeting". By this gate the carriages entered and rode along the avenue by the north side of the house to the east front of the premises. This avenue remained an alley way long after, even to within the early memory of Timothy Matlack, who told me that he had seen it open as a common passage into Second Street. The same was confirmed by Mr. Harris, a former owner, to Mr. Heberton, the present owner. Indeed, it is even now open and paved up to the rear of the house on Second Street. This general rural appearance was all in accordance with Penn's known taste, and was doubtless so continued until the ground was apportioned out in thirty city lots, as expressed by James Logan in a letter to Laetitia Aubrey, in the year 1737, saying, "There was about 26 shillings per annum reserved upon the large city lot, divided into thirty smaller parts --- seven on the Front Street, seven on Second Street, and eight on the High Street, -- all of these at one shilling Pennsylvania money per annum, and those in Laetitia Court at six pence each" for the remaining eight lots there. The following facts present scraps of information which may tend still further to illustrate the proper history of the premises, to wit : --- Penn's instructions to his commissioners, of 30th of 9 mo. 1681, says expressly, "Pitch upon the very middle of the platt of the towne, to be laid facing the harbour, for the situation of my house". Thus intimating, as I conceive, the choice of Laetitia Court, and intimating his desire to have it facing the river, "as the line of houses of the town should be". It is stated in the Minutes of the Executive Council of the 11th of 3d mo. 1685, that the proclamation of James II, and the papers relative to the death of Charles II, and the speech of his successor, were solemnly read before the Governor's gate in the town of Philadelphia. In 1721, the names of "Governor's lot" and of "Laetitia Court" are thus identified in the words of the Grand Jury, who present "the muddiness of the alley into Laetitia Court, formerly called the Governor's lot". I have seen a letter of the 14th of 6 mo. 1702, from James Logan to Laetitia Penn, wherein he speaks of the sale of several of her lots, after the square had been divided. He says he had sold the first four of the Front Street lots for £ 450, which money he set out on interest, &c. Since then he had sold sixteen feet of the bank, clear of reversion, with a small High Street lot, to Thomas Masters for £ 230. The corner lot next the Meeting House he sold for £ 115, and three High Street lots for 50 and £ 60 each; and the remaining four in the same street he hopes to sell soon. The whole sale effected is called £ 895, and shall continue to sell as occasion shall offer. He mentions also that he has agreed for the value of about £ 100 of her 15,000 acres, new tract of land, near New Castle County --- estimated, then, as to sell at £ 20 per hundred. "THY OLD MANSION I DO NOT TOUCH WITH. I hope in seven years to be able to raise thee a good portion from what is already settled on thee in this province. Be not too easily disposed of; it could be a scandal, that any of thy father's engagements should be an occasion to sacrifice thee to any but where true love officiates as priest. Thy marriage is commonly reported here", [as a measure to take place, to some one.] We discern from the premises that lots on High Street, now so highly prized, brought only one-third the price of lots on Front Street, now so much lower. We perceive, too, distinct mention of his reservation of the one house, called her mansion. Those who are curious to further explore this subject may find, in my MS Annals, in the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, much additional matter on pages 140 to 149, giving a table of descents of title to lots on the square, as deduced from Laetitia Penn, together with the brief presented me by Samuel Chew, Esq., and the testimony of sundry aged witnesses appearing in court, in 1822, to testify their early recollections concerning the Laetitia Court and the Inn at the head of the court. It appears from the whole, that William Penn, by patent or deed, conveyed to Laetitia Penn, on the 1st mo. 29th, 1701, the ground on the south side of High Street, 175 feet deep, [making the present distance to Black Horse Alley] and from Front to Second Street, 402 feet; granting unto her "all the houses, edifices, buildings, casements, liberties, profits, and commodities", thereunto belonging. Charter 14. SLATE-ROOF HOUSE, PENN'S RESIDENCE This house, still standing at the southeast corner of Norris' Alley and Second Street, and now reduced to a lowly appearance, derives its chief interest from having been the residence of William Penn. The peculiarity of its original construction, and the character of several of its successive inmates, will enhance its interest to the modern reader. The facts concerning the premises, so far as may now be known, are generally these, to wit: The house was originally built, in the early origin of the city, for Samuel Carpenter --- certainly one of the earliest and greatest improvers of the primitive city. It was probably designed for his own residence, although he had other houses on the same square, nearer to the river. His portrait is owned by Isaac C. Jones. It was occupied as the city residence of William Penn and family, while in Philadelphia on his second visit in 1700; in which house was born, in one month after their arrival, John Penn, "the American", --- the only one of the race ever born in the country. To that house therefore, humble, degenerated, and altered in aspect as it now is, we are to appropriate all our conceptions of Penn's employments, meditations, hopes, fears, &c., while acting as Governor and proprietary among us. In those doors he went in and out --- up and down those stairs he passed --- in those chambers he reposed --- in those parlours he dined or regaled his friends --- through those garden grounds they sauntered. His wife, his daughter Laetitia, his family and his servants, were there. In short, to those who can think and feel, the place "is filled with local impressions". Such a house should be rescued from its present forlorn neglect; [the same remark is applicable to Penn's cottage in Laetitia Court] it ought to be bought and consecrated to some lasting memorial of its former character, by restoring its bastions and salient angles, &c. It would be to the credit of such Societies as the Historical and Penn Association, &c., to club their means to preserve it for their chambers, &c., as long as themselves and the city may endure ! There is a moral influence in these measures that implies and effects much more in its influence on national action and feeling, than can reach the apprehension of superficial thinkers; who can only estimate its value by their conception of so much brick and mortar ! It was feelings, such as I wish to see appreciated here, that aroused the ardour of Petrarch's townsmen, jealous of every thing consecrated by his name, whereby they ran together `en masse' , to prevent the proprietor of his house from altering it ! Foreigners, we know, have honoured England by their eagerness to go to Bread Street, and there visit the house and chambers, once Milton's ! It is in vain to deride the passion as futile; the charm is in the ideal presence, which the association has power to create in the imagination; and they who can command the grateful visions will be sure to indulge them. It is poetry of feeling --- scoffs cannot repress it. It equally possessed the mind of Tully when he visited Athens; he could not forbear to visit the walks and houses which the old philosophers had frequented or inhabited. In this matter, says Dr. Johnson, "I am afraid to declare against the general voice of mankind". "The heart is stone that feels not at it; or, it feels at none !" Sheer insensibility, absorbed in its own selfishness, alone escapes the spell-like influence ! Every nation, when sufficiently intellectual, has its golden and heroic ages; and the due contemplation of these relics of our antiquities presents the proper occasion for forming ours. These thoughts, elicited by the occasion, form the proper apology for whatever else we may offer to public notice in this way. There is a generation to come who will be grateful for all such notices. After William Penn had left this house, on his intended return with his family to England, he, while aboard his return ship, the Messenger, (an appropriate name for the message and business he was proposing!) writes on the 3d of September 1701, to James Logan saying, "Thou may continue in the house I lived in till the year is up". James Logan, in reply in 1702 says, "I am forced to keep this house still, there being no accommodation to be had elsewhere for public business". In fact, he retained it as a government - house till 1704, when he and his coadjutors moved to Clark Hall in Chestnut Street, afterwards Pemberton's Great House. In a letter to William Penn of 5th December 1703, he says, "Samuel Carpenter has sold the house thou lived in to William Trent" (the founder of Trenton in 1719) for £ 850.* [*William Trent began his settlement at Trenton, in 1719, by erecting mills there. He died there in 1724, in the office of Chief Justice of New Jersey.] At this house, Lord Cornbury, then Governor of New York and New Jersey, (son of Lord Cornbury, cousin of Queen Anne, &c.) was banqueted in great style in 1702, on the occasion of his being invited by James Logan, from Burlington, where he had gone to proclaim the queen. Logan's letter, speaking of the event, says he was dined "equal to anything he had seen in America". At night he was invited to Edward Shippen's (great house in south Second Street) where he was lodged, and dined with all his company, making a retinue of nearly thirty persons. He went back well pleased with his reception, via Burlington, in the Governor's barge, and was again banqueted at Pennsbury by James Logan, who had preceded him for that purpose. Lord Cornbury had a retinue of about fifty persons, which accompanied him thither in four boats. His wife was once with him in Philadephia, in 1703. Penn, on one occasion, calls him a man of luxury and poverty. He was at first very popular; and having made many fine promises to Penn, it was probably deemed good policy to cheer his vanity by striking public entertainments. In time, however, his extravagant living, and consequent extortion, divested him of all respect among the people. Only one legendary tale respecting this personage has reached us: An old woman at Chester had told the Parker family she remembered to have seen him at that place, and having heard he was a lord, and a queen's cousin, she had eyed him with great exactness, and had seen no difference in him, from other men, but that he wore leather stockings !* [*William Penn, in one of his notes, says "Pray send me my leather stockings".] In 1709, "the slated-roof house of William Trent" is thus commended by James Logan as a suitable residence for him as Governor, saying "William Trent, designing for England, is about selling his house, (that he bought of Samuel Carpenter) which thou lived in, with the improvement of a beautiful garden", --- then extending half way to Front Street, and on Second Street nearly down to Walnut Street. "I wish it could be made thine, as nothing in this town is so well fitting a Governor. His price is £ 900 of our money, which it is hard thou canst not spare. I would give 20 to £ 30 out of my own pocket that it were thine --- nobody's but thine". The house was, however, sold to Isaac Norris, who devised it to his son Isaac, through whom it has descended down to the present proprietor, Sally Norris Dickinson, his granddaughter. It was occupied at one period, it is said, by Governor Hamilton, and for many years preceding the war of Independence, it was deemed a superior boarding house. While it held its rank as such, it was honoured with the company, and finally, with the funeral honours of General Forbes, successor to General Braddock, who died in that house in 1759. The pomp of his funeral from that house surpassed everything the simple inhabitants had before seen in their city. His horse was led in the procession, richly caparisoned, --- the whole conducted in all "the pomp of war", with funeral dirges, and a military array with arms reversed*, &c. [*He had great honours shown to him two years before for the capture of Fort du Quesne, (Fort Pitt) ] In 1764, it was rented to be occupied as a distinguished boarding house by the Widow Graydon, mother of Captain Graydon of Carlisle, who has left us his amusing "Memoirs of 60 years life in Pennsylvania". There his mother, as he informs us, had a great many gentry as lodgers. He describes the old house as very much of a castle in its construction, although built originally for a Friend. "It was a singular old fashioned structure, laid out in the style of a fortification, with abundance of angles both salient and re-entering. Its two wings projected to the street in the manner of bastions, to which the main building, retreating from 16 to 18 feet, served for a curtain". [We may say of this house: --- "Trade has changed the scene"; for the recess is since filled out to the front with store windows, and the idea of the bastions, though they are still there, is lost.] It had a spacious yard, half way to Front Street, and ornamented with a double row of venerable lofty pines, which afforded a very agreeable `rus in urbe'." She continued there till 1768-9, when she removed to Drinker's Big House, up Front Street near to Race Street. Graydon's anecdotes of distinguished persons, especialy of British officers and gentry who were inmates, are interesting. John Adams, and other members of the first congress, had their lodgings in "the State-house". The yard in front was two or three feet above the street, and was walled up higher than the grass plot within. Some of the lofty pines were still there in the Revolution. Mrs. Burdeau kept a ladies boarding-school in it, a daughter of General Wayne was one of the scholars. The eccentric General Lee was buried from it, and put in Christ Church ground, close along side of Church Alley, "He wished not to lie within a mile of Presbyterian ground, as too bad company".