Short Account of Malignant Fever in Philadelphia – Chapter XV (1793), Philadelphia County, PA Contributed to the PAGenWeb Archives by Marjorie B. Winter [marjw@cox.net] Copyright. All Rights Reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/pa/pafiles.htm ********************************************************* C H A P. XV.—Origin of the disorder. THIS disorder has most unquestionably been imported from the West Indies. As yet, however, owing to various obvious reasons, it is difficult to fix, with absolute precision, on the vessel or vessels, (for it is very probable it came in several, from the different infected islands) by which it was introduced. That it is an imported disorder, rests on the following reasons, each of which, singly, justifies the theory, but (Page 68) all, collectively, established it to the satisfaction of every candid and reasonable man. 1st The yellow fever existed in several of the West India islands a long time before its appearance here . 2nd Various vessels from those islands arrived here in July. 3rd Scarcely any precautions were used to guard against the disorder. 4th A respectable citizen of Philadelphia, supercargo of one of our vessels, saw, in July, six or seven people sick of this fever on board a brig at Cape François bound for our port. (Page 69) 5th A vessel from Cape François, which arrived here in July lost several of her people with this fever, on her passage. 6th A person from Cape François, died of this fever at Marcus Hook —and another at Chester. 7th The vessels in which those persons arrived, and which were infected with the effluvia of the sick and dead, came freely to our wharves, and particularly to that very one where the disorder made its first appearance. 8th Persons sick of the yellow fever have been landed in our city from vessels arrived from the West Indies. 9th Dead bodies have been seen deposited secretly on board some of those vessels. 10th There is the strongest reason to believe, that the beds and bedding of the sick and dead were not destroyed, but, on the contrary, brought into our city. 11th This disorder had every characteristic symptom that marked it on former occasions, when its importation was unquestioned. Lately, of all the reasons advanced to support the opinion of its having been generated here, the only one, that has even the appearance of plausibility, viz. the influence of a tropical season, such as we had last summer, is unanswerably refuted by the concurring testimony of Lind, Lining, Warren, and Bruce, who, in the most unequivocal manner, have declared that it does not depend on the weather. “It does not appear, from the most accurate observations of the variations of the weather, or any difference of the seasons, which I have been able to make for several years past, that this fever is any way caused, or much influenced by them; for I have seen it at all times, and in all seasons, in the (Page 70) coolest, as well as in the hottest time of the year. “This fever does not seem to take its origin from any particular constitution of the weather, independent of infectious miasmata, as Dr. Warren has formerly well observed; for within these twenty-five years, it has been only four times epidemical in this town, namely in the autumns of the years 1732, 39, 45, and 48, though none of those years, (excepting that of 1739, whose summer and autumn were remarkably rainy) were either warmer or more rainy, (and some of them less so) than the summers and autumns were in several other years, in which we had not one instance of any one seized with this fever: which is contrary to what would have happened, if particular constitutions of the weather, were productive of it, without infectious miasmata”. "In omni anni tempestate, sese essert hic morbus; symptomata autem graviora observantur, ubi calor magnus cum multa humiditate conjungitur ." Oslisli anni tenipe/late, sese essert hic morbus; symptornata autem graviora observantur, ubi calor magnus cum multa humiditate conjungitur.”