Richard Olsen Richards Biography This biography appears on pages 128-129 in "History of Dakota Territory" by George W. Kingsbury, Vol. IV (1915) and was scanned, OCRed and edited by Maurice Krueger, mkrueger@iw.net. This file may be freely copied by individuals and non-profit organizations for their private use. Any other use, including publication, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission by electronic, mechanical, or other means requires the written approval of the file's author. This file is part of the SDGENWEB Archives. If you arrived here inside a frame or from a link from somewhere else, our front door is at http://usgwarchives.org/sd/sdfiles.htm RICHARD OLSEN RICHARDS. The political history of South Dakota has been influenced in a vital and beneficial way through the activities of Richard Olsen Richards, whose public spirit, energy and initiative ability have made him a powerful factor in state development. Almost continuously since 1883, Mr. Richards has lived in south Dakota and in addition to his prominence in politics has had an enviable business success. Mr. Richards was born in Sandefjorde, Norway, in 1866, and is a descendant of several prominent Norwegian and Danish families among them the well known Ahlefeldt family. His ancestors were numbered among the foremost men in Norway and Denmark in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. He was educated in a private school. At an early age his love for liberty and progress and his fellowmen prompted his coming to America which afforded greater opportunities for development. He landed in America at the age of fifteen and immediately began to carve his own way. Having a good command of English and German, as well as of his native tongue, he secured a position as interpreter at Castle Garden, where he remained for two years. He next engaged in the ship brokerage business in New York for one year. Then, following the footsteps of thousands of other Scandinavian emigrants, he came to the northwest locating first at Luverne, Minnesota, then Mitchell, South Dakota, and lastly at Huron, where he built up an extensive investment business. He prospered and soon became known both as a successful business man and an influential citizen. Since 1898 Mr. Richards has devoted almost his entire time and spent a large fortune in forwarding public welfare, and was the instigator of the progressive movement in this state. Among many measures for the public interest which Mr. Richards championed to success are the divorce law, anti-pass law and in a general way the abolition of spoils which commercialize government. Everything that South Dakota has had in way of primary laws have been builded around and upon his efforts. To Mr. Richards has been given the initiative to evolve an organization law whereby state government can be made responsive and responsible to the will of the people in order to forward equity and progress for the interests of all the people. The so-called Richards primary law is a masterpiece of construction for organization of public welfare, through the state. Its principles are eternally right and it is safe to say that it will ultimately as a pattern for political organization laws in United States. The Richards primary law first eliminates the spoils system and provides for an intelligent initiatory. It lays the foundation for conservative progress by making a legal division of minority and majority proposals within the party for principles, instead of division on personalities between candidates for office. The people elect committeemen by a direct vote to meet at the state capitol. These committeemen act in committee of the whole and select the paramount issue and principles for public policies, together with candidates guaranteed as to character and ability, as standard bearers, by majority vote, the committeemen at all times casting their vote by "unit representation." Following the state proposal meeting, copies of the proposals, with arguments in their behalf and short biographies of the candidates are filed with the secretary of state, whose duty it is to compile the same into the State Publicity Pamphlet, a copy of which is mailed, at the expense of the state, to every elector. In addition to this 'scans of publicity, the law provides for public joint debates between the candidates for governor and for president, to discuss the paramount issue. In this way the people are given state-wide information as to the issues and are furnished a uniform ballot throughout the state which enables them to east an intelligent vote at the primary election and obtain majority rule. In this manner a harmonious ticket is nominated as a result of the primary election. And the candidates nominated, when confirmed at the general election, are in a position to properly carry out the policies endorsed by a majority of the people. The law also provides for meritorious distribution of the official patronage. The postmasters are made through postmaster primaries, held in the municipality where the candidate for postmaster seeks appointment. The candidates for postmaster are nominated by tile electors affiliated with the national party in power; but when the postmaster primary takes place, all the electors living in the municipality, who arc patrons of the office, may vote, regardless of party affiliation. Other essential features of the law are the provisions for registration of electors, unit representation, state publicity pamphlet, the corrupt practice act and the party recall by jury trial. Checks and balances are provided throughout the law, so that equilibrium is the result, making the state government the people's automaton. Mr. Richards wells to the legislature with his primary law twice. The politicians persuaded the legislature to turn down the law on both occasions; but the people adopted and sustained it at the elections of 1912 and 1914. Immediately after its adoption, by an overwhelming vote in 1912, the politicians sought to repeal the law by submitting another primary law, known as the Coffey law, under the initiative and referendum to a vote of tee people in 1914. The people rejected the Coffey law by a large majority. Thus the people have twice declared in favor of the Richards primary law - once by directly voting it in and a second time by refusing to accept a substitute. Yet, when the legislature convened in 1915, a few weeks after the people had emphatically approved the Richards law for the second time, the politicians again sought its repeal, but this time by a legislative enactment in direct violation of the constitution governing direct legislation. Meanwhile over eight thousand electors petitioned for the reenactment of the Law, with certain necessary amendments, and it is now submitted for the third time to a direct vote of the people in November, 1916. The Richards primary law has never been given a fair trial and those in charge of the state government have blocked its practical workings in every conceivable manner. All in all the Richards primary law, like everything else of merit, has had a hard road to travel. Nevertheless the real progressives (thinkers) in the state have always come forward to its rescue and now anxiously await an opportunity to reenact and put the law in favorable hands for administration. Then only can its practical workings be properly demonstrated to perfect state government, by consideration of the paramount issue of one public policy at a time, and thus make good the motto of the great seal of South Dakota-"Under God the People Rule."