Nansemond-Surry-Isle of Wight County Virginia USGenWeb Archives History.....Christian Church, 1941 ************************************************ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.net/va/vafiles.htm ************************************************ SURRY WAS BIRTH PLACE OF CHURCH By Major W. E. McClenny, Suffolk, Va. (Editor's Note: This is the first installment of an article written by Major W.E. MacClenny of Suffolk. Watch each day for the succeeding installment.) In the year 1794, the year that the Christian Church in the South was organized in Surry County. Va. by the Rev. James O'Kelly and his associates, he, the leader of the movement organized O'Kelly's Chapel near his farm in Chatham Co., N.C. and on March 30th, 1941, there was a home coming meeting held at the church, and the following was prepared for.the occasion by Major W.E. MacClenny, Suffolk, Va. Rev. James O'Kelly. The Rev. James O'Kelly was born in Virginia very likely in Mecklenburg county about 1738. He fixes the place in his Essay of Negro Slavery and the date is from his Testament record in Elon College library. Of his parents we know little. He says that he was born of poor parentage. Tradition says his fathers name was William. About his brothers and sisters we know nothing with certainty. He says at one time he consulted his brother John, who was a man of affairs and there is a tradition that he was a large tobacconist. He was of Irish descent. Cellach, chief of Hy Many and 14th in descent from Main Mor was the progenitor from whom the O'Kellys derive their surname. The family has been prominent in Ireland for ages, going back to the year 960 A.D. Many churchmen and statesmen have come from it. There are many works, some in Latin, in the Congressional library by members of the family. Today there are many of the name in "Who is (Continued on page eight) Birth Of.... (Continued from page one) Who" In Ireland. About his youth we know little. One of his friends, Osborn Pope of Granville County, North Carolina, in a letter written to him before 1801, gives us a glimpse of his youth as follows: "Little did I think, when Samuel Yeargin, the preacher (perhaps Andrew Yeargin), my mother and myself persuaded you to join in society about 25 years ago, I should ever live to see you as stigmatized as you are, and the Scripture, so depreciated by the Methodist Synod, and from all I hear in private and public you are thus treated because you hold by the New Testament or Scripture government which was the very term of union at first. I knew you for years before you joined the Methodists and I never heard you were called a lying man, a tattler, a mischief maker, or a busy body in other men's matters, but on the contrary, when unconverted, mirth and company you delighted in. Now if religion makes a man so much more like the devil than he was by nature he had better have none." This letter confirms the tradition that he was a great fiddler and prize fighter in his young days. About his educational advantages we know nothing except what is learned from his writings. Schools were scarce in his day. There is evidence in some of his printed works that be had a fair knowledge of the Greek and Latin languages, and that be was fairly well versed in general history. As to the date of his marriage to Miss Elizabeth Meeks, who was descended from some of the earliest colonists at Jamestown, and who through his long and checkered life shared his joys and divided his sorrows we have no definite information. She was born about the year 1744 and her son, William O'Kelly was born April 29th, 1763. Therefore, we know that the couple were married young, the husband being about 24 years old and the wife about 18 years of age. In his will he mentions his son, John first, then William’s heirs. Very likely William was the older. William O’Kelly became a statesman and sat in both Houses of the North Carolina Legislature. As to his occupation before entering the ministry nothing is known. In the summer of 1774 James O’Kelly turned his attention to religious matters and was soon converted. We will let him tell of this. Says he: "My first mental alarm was not through the blessed means of preaching: but by the kind illuminations of the Invisible Holy Spirit. I saw by this divine light, that I was without God, and destitute of any reasonable hope in my present State. Now, being moved by faith through fear, I attempted to flee the wrath to come, and seek a place of refuge! But, O, what violent opposition did I meet with! After many sorrowful months I formed one resolution. With a low cadence of voice and fearful apprehension, I ventured, like Queen Esther who approached the King’s presence at the risk of her life, so I ventured in a way of prayer, to speak to the Almighty! With the Bible in my hand, I besought the Lord to help me, and during life, that sacred book should be my guide, and declaring that at the close, if I sunk to perdition, ‘Just, O God! yet dreadful! But if Thy clemency and divine goodness should at least rescue me from the jaws of a burning hell, this miracle of grace shall be gratefully remembered by me, a Monument of Mercy! "The things which followed, which were such things as belonged to my peace, the inexpressible change, the instantaneous cure, I am incapable of speaking of; but O, my soul was lodged in Immanuel’s breast, the City of Refuge - the Ark of my Rest. And in those days God sent preachers into our dark regions, who were burning and shining lights." Immediately after his conversion everything irreligious was abandoned, his iron will no half way ground. He deliberately laid his fiddle on a huge fire and burned it knowing and his other wordly amusements were laid aside. His son, William was converted before his father and felt called to preach, but his father dissuaded him owing to his age, and soon Mr. O’Kelly felt that the Lord laid the burden of preaching on him, therefore he at once became active in religious work, and on January 2nd, 1775 he was licensed a Methodist lay preacher and sent out as one of that immortal band of American lay preachers in the societies. He was not, however, ordained either deacon, or priest (elder), as no Episcopal minister would have done that. Thus from January 2nd, 1775 to the Christmas Conference of 1784 in Baltimore, Md., or for nearly ten years he was a layman, a member of the Protestant Episcopal Church, who belonged to the Methodist societies of the Rev. John Wesley in America. His name first appears in the Methodist minutes at the Conference at Leesburg, Va. when he is reported as remaining on trial. His first official station was on the New Hope circuit, in North Carolina. The first mention that we have of his preaching in Methodist history was in an old colonial church, in Southern Virginia, about 1777. The location of this church is not known with certainty. One writer noticing this early work of Mr. O'Kelly says: "The people flocked to hear him and great was the work of God under his powerful exhortations, and earnest prayers. The parish minister was greatly enraged that an upstart Methodist preacher should have the temerity to preach in his chapel, and what was worse that he should attract more people than the regular successor to the apostles. In spite of the curate's violent opposition he continued to preach for more than a year with increasing success. The next year be joined "Asbury's Ironsides." He was a man of outstanding natural ability, and soon took a high stand in the ranks of Methodism. The Rev. Devereaux Jarratt the noted Episcopalian speaks of him as a man of ability and a brilliant speaker. In order to understand the Rev. James O'Kelly's early work, we will have to take a bird’s eye view of the conditions in Virginia in 1778. The Methodists had been in the State six years. English laws, manners and customs prevailed. Virginia was in truth a little England. The Episcopal Church was the state church, and in many instances it had become very corrupt, and many of its ministers were very poor example of morality, yet they opposed other sects. The Methodist societies, seeking a closer walk with God, regarded themselves as a part of the Episcopal Church up to the year 1784. The Revolutionary war was on, and was soon transferred to the South, and a large majority of the people of Virginia and North Carolina were down on everything having the English stamp upon it. The Rev. John Wesley had sent over to America the Rev. Francis Asbury as a missionary. Mr. Asbury was ambitious to leave his name at the head of American Methodism, while republican ideas were shooting in the popular mind, and the people were demanding the greatest possible freedom in church government. The subject discussed most frequently was regarding the administration of the ordinances of the church, baptism, the Lord's supper, marriage, and the burial of the dead. No Methodist preacher could administer these rites. Episcopal ministers were few, many having returned to England at the beginning ot the war, and those left paid little attention to the Methodists, so that in some places the Lord’s Supper had not been administered for years, and thousands were baptized. The Methodist ministers and laity felt the thrill of free American air, and demanded that the ordinances be administered by Methodist preachers. The Baptists of Virginia were demanding the same thing for their members, from the Virginia Legislature and won it. Mr. Asbury and a few other Methodists opposed this movement. These were the issues that first started the movement that eventually led to the organization of the Methodist Church of America - and later the organization of the Christian Church in the the South. ****************************************************************************** SURRY WAS BIRTH PLACE OF CHURCH By Major W. E. McClenny, Suffolk, Va. SECOND INSTALLMENT Of the Methodist preachers south of the Potomac river, a large majority were opposed to Mr. Asbury’s plan of letting things drift in this way, therefore in the minutes of the Methodist conference held at Broken-back church, Fluvanna county, Virginia in 1779, we find in spite of Mr. Asbury’s opposition the following questions and answers. "What are the reasons for taking up the ordinances among us? Because the Episcopal Establishment is now dissolved, and therefore in almost all of the circuits the members are without the ordinances, we believe it to be our duty. What preachers do approve of this step? Isham Tatum, Nelson Reed, Phillip Gatch, James Morris, John Major, Henry Willis, John Sagman, Carter Coles, William Moore, Charles Hopkins, Reuben Ellis, Thomas Morris, James Foster, Andrew Yeargin, Francis Poythress, Leroy Coles, James O’Kelly and Samuel Roe. A presbytery was appointed consisting of Gatch, Coster and Ellis, first to administer the ordinances themselves, second to authorize any other preacher or preachers approved by them, by the laying on of hands to administer the ordinances. Out of this event grew the Methodist Church of America as a separate organization, the Rev. James O’Kelly being one of the leaders in the movement. The Rev. Francis Asbury by his opsition to this movement set in motion the influences that led to the organization of the Christian Church in the South in 1794. We will now look at another side of his life which developed at this time, his service in the Revolutionary War. He and his family had been living in Virginia long enough to feel the spirit of freedom which was then abroad in the land, and this was blown into a flame by the speeches of Patrick Henry and others regarding the Acts of the English Parliament. When the storm did break, the members of his family did not go into hiding, not try to shun the (Continued on page eight [sic; seven]) Surry Was.... (Continued From Page One) issue as the lists of the Revolutionary soldiers in Virginia and North Carolina will show. (Note. The Virginia lists published in 1911 give the names of William D. and Thomas D. O’Kelly while the North Carolina list shows the name of Patrick O'Kelly.) We will let James O’Kelly tell his own story as follows: "As to my conduct it may be traced through the American Revolution. After the intinerant preachers fled from the South, for fear of danger, I labored and traveled from circuit to circuit, in North Carolina, to feed and comfort those poor distressed sheep, left in the wilderness. Philip, whose surname was Bruce, helped me - through great perils. We judged it best, for men in our business, to move as quietly as possible. I was taken prisoner by the Tories, and robbed; I was retaken before day, by Captain Peter Robertson, the great and noted Whig. I was afterwards taken prisoner by the British. The chief officer urged me to subject myself to my King, and although I was in his hand I would not yield. He offered to release me if I would solemnly promise not to let any man know, asked or not asked where the British lay. I refused to do that. Then I was despised, and very near famished for bread. At which time I resolved through grace, to hold my integrity till death. My honor, my oath - my soul were at stake; till at last, Providence offered me an opportunity, which I gladly embraced, and narrowly escaped their hands. After these things, I went (not as a prisoner) into General Rutherford’s camps, and there by the testimony of two worthy gentlemen, viz; Colonel Robertson and Colonel Owens, of Bladen, did I establish my political and civil character. I stood my draft as other men. Once my substitute faithfully served a tour. Once I marched on foot as far as I was able. Which of my accusers have done more?" "Let us proceed to show our receipts-which of the itinerant men have paid more to support government, than I have done? This is in striking contrast to the experiences ot some ot the Rev. James O’Kelly's brethren, for Dr. Bennett in his "Memorials of Methodism in Virginia" says: "When the war was brought into Virginia many Methodists were whipped for refusing to bear arms." The spirit of liberty in James O'Kelly was too strong for him to refuse the call of patriotism, and no such ignominious punishment as the whipping post could ever have been his portion for refusing to bear arms in behalf of freedom. Governor Swain of North Carolina in communicating to Dr. Caruthers an account of the Slingsby affair and published in Caruthers' "Old North State, in 1776" relates the follows: "The Anecdote of the Methodist preacher, which you wished me to relate, I had from the old gentleman’s own lips. Mr. O'Kelly, then a young Methodist preacher, when traveling over the country and preaching, was taken at the house of a friend or acquaintance, by a small party of Tories. His horse, saddle and saddle-bags were taken from him, and he was tied to a peach tree. A party of Whigs coming up just at that time, a skirmish ensued; and although, he was between the two fires, he was not hurt. Before this skirmish was ended. Colonel Slingsby came up with a larger party of men, and the Whigs were dispersed. He recognizing O’Kelly, the Colonel asked him to preach for them which he did, and drawing up his men in good order, he stood with his head uncovered, during the whole of the service. Mr. O'Kelly said, when relating this anecdote to me, 'Ah! Child! your grandfather was a gentlemen; An old lady who was well acquainted with Mr. O'Kelly, tells me, that the man at whose house he was taken was also taken and bound to the same tree, and killed in the skirmish. She had heard him relate the anecdote frequently - I, only once. The Rev. John Wesley called the Christmas Conference for the American Methodists to set up a form of government for the societies. They were directed to follow the Scriptures and the primitive church, and to stand fast in the liberty wherewith God had so strangely made them free. This was Mr. O'Kelly's idea exactly, and had that idea been carried out no separation would have ever taken place. This Conference met in Baltimore, December 24, 1784. The representative Methodists of American were there. The time-honored plan of Wesley could no longer be carried out in America with no Established church. The Conference was held with closed doors, and not long was put to the vote. The societies were organized into the Methodist Episcopal Church of America, though Mr. O’Kelly and many others wanted the word Episcopal left out. He did his uttermost to prevent its being used, but could not prevent it. On Sunday, January 2, 1785, the Rev. James O'Kelly with twelve others were ordained elders, by Dr. Thomas Coke, the Revs. Francis Asbury, Richard Whatcoat, Thomas Vasey, and P.W. Otterbein. Then and there the Rev. James O'Kelly ceased to be a member of the Episcopal Church, ceased to be a lay Methodist preacher, and became an elder in the Methodist Episcopal Church of America. When the organisation was completed it was a church of ministers, by ministers and for ministers, with the Rev. Francis Asbury at its head, in truth if not in form. Mr. O’Kelly with others did not like this form of government, but could only express their disapproval, and hope that the time would come when it could be changed to a free and untrammeled church, and the subordinate preachers get their rights and still be Methodists. In organizing, they departed from the New Testament principles - ths equality of the breathren - the parity of the ministry - and a hierarchy was inevitable. Virtually every official from the highest to the lowest was an appointee of the bishop. Mr. O’Kelly’s influence in his district was great, and when he returned home he set about to instruct the people, and show them the weaknesses of the plan of government adopted and to try to have it remedied. The Rev. Francis Asbury did not like this, for he thought a layman should only pay, pray, and obey. See Third Installment Tomorrow ****************************************************************************** SURRY WAS BIRTH PLACE OF CHURCH By Major W. E. McClenny, Suffolk, Va. THIRD INSTALLMENT Mr. O'Kelly is put down in Methodist history as one of the strong men in the great revival in Virginia, in 1788. This lasted for about a year, it is added that he was a man of great powers of endurance, mighty in prayer, full of the Holy Ghost. He was ac-customed to arise at midnight and pour out his soul to God in prayer. In 1789 and several years before he was living in Mecklenburg county, Va. on a tract of 40 acres given him and his wife by his friend and admirer Tegnal Jones. He attended the Council in Baltimore, in 1789. This meeting was to try to remedy some of the things adopted in 1784. He saw that the measures applied did not suit the case and would have nothing to do with its workings when he went home. Mr. O'Kelly was working for religious liberty riveting an autocratic, or aristocratetic, form of church government on the Methodist Church. One instance of this we give. In 1790, Bishop Asbury turned out nineteen God-fearing, pious and devoted ministers, because they would not adopt his plans, and only two voted for the adoption. About this time Mr. O'Kelly began to correspond with the leading Methodists, both in America and England, and made a powerful impressed [sic] on them for a more liberal policy for the church. He won over Dr. Coke and had a General Conference called November 1, 1792, and today some say the Methodists owe this most important part of their policy to Rev. James O'Kelly. The purpose of this conference was to revise the plan of government for the church. After discusing other things, on the second day, Mr. O'Kelly offered the following resolution: "After the Bishop appoints the preachers at conference to their several circuits, if anyone think himself injured by the appointment he shall have the liberty to appeal to the Conference and state his objections and if the Conference approve his objections, the Bishop shall appoint him to another circuit. This is known as the 'Right of Appeal.'" A long and stormy debate followed, lasting nearly a week. The ablest men of Methodism were arrayed against each other. At first it seemed that the resolution would pass without much opposition. The resolution was at length divided and the discussion begun anew. Sunday intervened and Mr. O'Kelly preached in the city. Monday the discussion was continued until bedtime, when the vote was taken and the resolution lost. When the motion was lost, Revs. James O'Kelly, Rice Haggard, William McKendree and others, left the conference, and Mr. O'Kelly wrote a farewell letter to the conference. English Methodists had passed a similar resolution a few months before, but Mr. O’Kelly did not know of it. Bishop Asbury and Dr. Coke at once set about to try to reconcile Mr. O'Kelly and his associates. They were asked on what terms they would return. The answer was: "Only let an injured man have an appeal." This would not be granted. Mr. O'Kelly and his friends then went home. Bishop Asbury sent messengers to him beseeching him to return, and telling him how he valued him. The Methodist pulpits were left open to him, if he would keep quiet, and he was to receive his usual pay. This, however, was never paid. When he was leaving Baltimore the false report was started that he denied the doctrine of the Trinity. Did space permit it, we would give evidence to show how he was slandered, his account of his conversion and the form of ordination of his ministers, shows where he stood. From the local Methodist records we learn that Rev. James O'Kelly was the presiding Elder over the section in which Nansemond County is located in the years 1790 and 1792, and when he left the Baltimore Conference of 1792, after he had returned home he organized Christian congregations at Holy Neck Chapel, Cypress Chapel, and Antioch, or as was then known as the Old Chapel in Isle of Wight County, Va. These have been strong churches in the denomination since that day. Mr. O'Kelly and his brethren met at Reese Chapel, in Charlotte County, Virginia, in 1792, to look over the situation. Another meeting was soon held at the same place. At these meetings the seceders strove hard for union with the Methodists, and sent messengers with their petitions for union to Bishop Asbury. They only asked for some amendments. These were not granted. Mr. O’Kelly then drew up an humble petition pointing out a few of the evils he saw in the government of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and prayed for union. The Methodists were not allowed to sign these petitions under pain of expulsion. The seceders next met at Piney Grove in Chesterfield County, Virginia, on August 2, 1793. They now asked permission to meet the Bishop in conference that the Methodist Episcopal Church government might be examined by the Scripture, and amended according to the Holy Word. Bishop Asbury's reply to this request was: "I have no power to call such a meeting as you wish; therefore, if five hundred preachers would come on their knees before me, I would not grant it." This was the answer received at a conference of the seceders held at the Manakin Town in Powhatan County, Va. December 24, 1793. Only two courses were now left, to separate, or to slavishly submit. They chose the former. Here is where Rev. James O’Kelly ceased to be a Methodist Presiding Elder, and became the first Christian minister. Here the plans were laid for a free and untrammeled Church, with the Bible as a creed. A constitution was adopted at this conference, but was discarded at the next conference. The ministers were to be on an equality, the laymen were to have voted, and the executive business was left with the church collectively. Another conference was called before inaugurating the new plan. They called themselves "Republican Methodists." Missionaries were sent out and did wonderful work. The next General Meeting was held August 4, 1794, in Surry County, Virginia. It was held open doors that all might see and learn. A committee of seven was appointed to devise a permanent plan of church government. Finally they determined to pay [sic] aside every manuscript and follow the Bible as their guide, and have no government besides the Scriptures as written by the apostles. The question of a name then came up again. Rev. Rice Haggard arose, holding a copy of the New Testament in his hand, and said: "Brethren, this is a sufficient rule of faith and practice. By it we are told that the disciples were called Christians and I move that henceforth and forever the followers of Christ be known as Christians simply." The motion was carried. Mr. O’Kelly says: "At this conference the blessed Jesus was proclaimed King and Head of the people without one dissenting voice. The holy qualifications of an elder as laid down by St. Paul were read and explained. Then after prayer we proceeded in the following manner to ordain ministers: In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, by the authority of the Holy Scriptures, with the approbation of the church, and with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery, we set apart this our brother to the holy office of Elder in the church of God: In the name of the Father, and the son of [sic] the Holy Ghost." There were about thirty ministers with Mr. O’Kelly at the organization; prominent among these were Rev. Richard Haggard, Burwell Barrett and others. The organization completed, aggressive work was begun. O’Kelly's Chapel, in North Carolina, was organized the same year, and he began his preaching tours afresh, and planted churches in the destitute places. For something like thirty three years he labored faithfully to establish the Christian Church in the South, and before his death he saw it well established in the minds and hearts of the people. Prior to his death he asserted that he believed the cause of full religious liberty would finally triumph. ****************************************************************************** SURRY WAS BIRTH PLACE OF CHURCH By Major W.E. McClenny, Suffolk, Va. FOURTH INTALLMENT He often held open discussions with the enemies of the new church, for they were many. One of these was held in the old Methodist Church in Portsmouth, Va. He was a firm believer in Baptism by sprinkling or pouring. At the General meeting of 1807, at Raleigh, N.C. he baptized the Rev. Joseph Thomas, the "White Pilgrim" by pouring. In Mr. O’Kelly's day the territorial limits of the Christian church in Virginia and North Carolina were as large, if not larger, than they are today. Commencing at his home in central North Carolina, it extended from there to Norfolk, Virginia, then up the Chesapeake Bay shore to the neighborhood of Mt. Vernon, from there to Winchester, Virginia, and then it seems that there were some churches in southwest Virginia. From this we get an idea of the size of his circuit, for he visited all the churches, and while riding in his gig he wrote most of his books. It is said that he was an intimate friend of Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, and perhaps visited these distinguished persons on his preaching tours. While visiting in Washington, D.C. tradition says Mr. Jefferson secured the Hall of Representatives and invited Mr. O'Kelly to preach. He did preach twice, and on the second occasion Mr. Jefferson was the most delighted man in the audience. Bishop Asbury has this to say in regard to the last meeting with Mr. O'Kelly who was sick near Winchester, Virginia, on August 23, 1803: "We met in peace and asked of each other's welfare, talked of persons and things indifferently, prayed and parted in peace. Not a word was said of the troubles of former times." James O’Kelly is said to have preached five sermons at different places in one day and none of these bore any sameness. The strongest Methodist preachers followed in his tracks to win back those who had joined the Christian Church. He was the author of several books and pamphlets. We mention the following: (1) An Essay on negro slavery published in 1789, The Author's Apology for Protesting against the Methodist Episcopal Government. A Vindication of an Apology. Divine Oracles Consulted, Christicola, Church Government, the Christian Church, Annotation on His Book of Discipline, Letters from Heaven Consulted, A Tract on Baptism, Commentaries on the Books of the New Testament, Hymns and Spiritual Songs Designed for the Use of the Christians, and the Prospect Before Us by way of an address. Hope did not desert him in age and feebleness extreme. He gave testimony to those around him at the close of his life that he went down to the grave satisfied with the past, and peaceful and trusting with respect to the future. He had a long, white flowing beard, and continued to preach after he was unable to stand, sometimes sitting while he preached. He passed away at his home in Chatham County, North Carolina, on the 16th of October 1826, in the triumphs of a living faith, after a painful and lingering illness which he bore with Christian fortitute and a perfect resignation of the Will of Heaven. He was in the 88th year of his age and had been a minister of the gospel over fifty years. He was buried in the family cemetery on his farm where his remains now rest. His son John O’Kelly was living in 1882, and from his wife’s will we learn the following heirs: Josiah Atkins, Mary K. O'Kelly, John McCauley, Franklin O'Kelly, Leslie O'Kelly. (These appear to have been the children of one grandson, and Lucinda Anderson, Wm. J. O'Kelly, Jane D. Barbee, Thomas J. Fowler, Viola B. O'Kelly, Mary T. Bildes (Bilbow) and Mosley Masy were another set. Franklin O'Kelly was the executor. Elisabeth Meeks O'Kelly, James O'Kelly's widow died Feb. 11th, 1833. For twenty-eight years it seems that no shaft was erected to his memory, but in 1854 the Christians, South, erected to his memory a monument bearing this inscription "Erected by his Christian friends to the memory of James O'Kelly of North Carolina, the Southern Champion of Christian Freedom." This short sentence sums up the life work of the organizer of the first free and untrammeled church in America. He lived far in advance of his time, and he will be admired more and more as the years go by, until his creed shall become that of the Protestant World. He served his day and generation well. Today 115 years after his death and 147 years after he organized this church, we are assembled here to pay tribute to his memory, that of his family, and acquaintances, wholebored [sic] so long in this section, and for so I many years it stood out as a lighthouse in our beloved church. Now we come to the point where we make an evaluation of the character of Rev. James O'Kelly. He was a man of exceptionally strong mind, although he may not have had the best advantages in youth. He so improved himself that he was perfectly at home in any company he found himself. He had a great personality, and the people flocked to him to hear his word. Tegnal Jones and wife gave him and his wife a life interest in a tract of 40 acres of land in Mecklenburg County, Va., owing to the respect that they had for him, and the fact that they wanted him to make his home in that section. It was one of the first parsonages that we have located in Virginia outside of the Established Church. All say that he was a brilliant speaker, a student of the Bible, and a powerful revivalist, men and women of all classes hung on his words. A man is judged by the company in which he is found, and after 40 years of the study of his life and work in all sections, we have found him ever where able to meet and converse with the most intelligent, and the wealthy people, and to hold their respect. From accounts he was a close acquaintance of Thomas Jefferson, the best posted man in America in his day. Also Governor Patrick Henry and others of that class, yet he was humble and could talk with the illiterate slave and show him the way of life. He was of a strong will, and like the Irish believed in striving by all fair means to carry his point. He believed in beginning at home and laying his first base of operations there, and the result was that in 1794, the same year of the Surry County, Virginia meeting where the Christian Church in the South was organized, he organized this church where we are today. He had so lived in his home community that the people were willing to follow him, thus refuting the old adage that "a prophet is not without honor save in his own country." He also organized other churches in this section as the records of your Court will show. He lived in a new day, and was far ahead of his time as a reformer. Perhaps his human side was as good as that of any other man of his day. He was true to himself, true to his family, true to his church, true to his country, and true to his God. Christian Church in the South, split from the Methodist Episcopal Church, 1792, organized organized at Old Lebanon Church, Surry Co., Aug 1794, founder & first minister Rev. James O'Kelly, "The Suffolk (VA) News-Herald," Vol. 19, No. 79, Apr. 4, 1941, pp. 1 & 8; "The Suffolk (VA) News-Herald," Vol. 19, No. 80, Apr. 5, 1941, pp. 1 & 7; "The Suffolk (VA) News-Herald," Vol. 19, No. 81, Apr. 7, 1941, p. 2; "The Suffolk (VA) News-Herald," Vol. 19, No. 82, Apr. 8, 1941, p. 2 Additional information: Newpaper articles (text corrected) at: https://virginiachronicle.com/ A report by Major MacClenny, on the organization of the Christian Church South, focusing on its early ministers & missionaries, given to the 36th regular session of the Southern Convention of Congregational Christian Churches, Reidsville, 2 May 1944, and published in the "Suffolk News- Herald," May 3, 1944) is posted at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/isleofwight/nansemond/chr_chs.txt The author generally spelled his surname MacCLENNY, although his parents, David [Jr.] & Ann Maria (HOLLAND) McCLENNY, did not. A Spanish-American War veteran, he was the author of "The life of Rev. James O'Kelly and the early history of the Christian church in the South" (1910: Raleigh, NC, Edwards & Broughton Printing Co.) LVA: Closed Stacks BX6793.O4 M3 His obit ("Suffolk News-Herald," Mar. 5, 1950, p. 3) is posted at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/nansemond/obits/m245w3ob.txt He & his parents are buried in Cedar Hill Cemetery, Suffolk - Block H, Lot 56. Cedar Hill list, an extension of the Southampton County Historical Society {SCHS} Cemetery Project: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/nansemond/cemeteries/cedar_m.txt The Library of Virginia has available on microfiche a work by Nicholas Snethen in defense of the Methodist Episcopal government, in response to O'Kelly: "A reply to an apology for protesting against the Methodist Episcopal government" (1800: Philadelphia, PA, printer Henry Tuckniss) LVA: Fiche 131 Evans 38527 (Main) VA Department of Historic Resources Highway Marker K-236: Organization of the Christian Church At "Old Lebanon Church" here, the Christian Church was established under the leadership of James O'Kelly, August, 1794. O'Kelly had withdrawn from the Methodist Church, 1792. erected by the Conservation & Development Commission, 1935 https://vcris.dhr.virginia.gov/HistoricMarkers/ The history of Holland Christian Church- organized as Hebron Christian Church, Carrsville, Oct 1853, & moved to Holland & re-built, 1891 & re-built, 1919, ("Suffolk News-Herald," Vol. 15, No. 109, July 28, 1937, Farm & Home Sect., p. 6) is posted at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/nansemond/history/hol_chr.txt The history of Suffolk Christian Church, organized Nov 1860; building dedicated Mar 1861; re-built, 1891-93; building dedicated 28 Jan 1894, ("Suffolk News-Herald," July 26 & 30, 1937, p. 4) is posted at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/nansemond/history/suf_chr.txt An article ("Sussex-Surry Dispatch," Sep. 28, 1961, p. 1) on Rev. Burwell BARRETT & his descendants, and Barrett's Christian Church, which he founded in 1808, is posted at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/sussex/history/barrett.txt Antioch Christian Church, near Windsor, is the mother church of the remaining Christian congregations in Isle Of Wight Co. - Mout Carmel, Isle Of Wight & Windsor. (King, "Historical Notes on Isle Of Wight County," p. 317 &c.) Contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by File Manager Matt Harris (zoobug64@aol.com). file at: http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/nansemond/history/chr_ch.txt